CLASS 46
Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.
Click here subscribe for free.
Who we all are...
THURSDAY, 30 APRIL 2009
ECJ rejects SAFETY 1ST mark
Tags: community trade mark, distinctiveness,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA1039
ECJ rejects SAFETY 1ST mark
The Order of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (Fifth Chamber) of 30 January 2009 in Case C-131/08 P Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market has been posted today on the Curia website.
In short, this was an application to register as a Community trade mark the words SAFETY 1ST for goods in Classes 12 -- ‘Bicycles, car seats, car beds, folding convertible car seats, car booster seats, child carriers, namely, strollers and carriages’, 20 -- ‘Furniture, namely, juvenile high chairs, folding play yards for children, cribs, bassinets, toddler and youth beds, booster seats, bed rails, head boards, mattress for cribs, juvenile dressing tables, cradles and rocking chairs), 21 -- ‘Infant bath tubs, baby toilet trainers’) and 28 -- Play and exercise equipment for children, namely, doorway jumpers, floor bouncers, floor exercisers, swings, and child walker/jumpers’.
Unsurprisingly the Court agreed with the examiner, the Board of Appeal and the Court of First Instance in ruling that the mark was devoid of distinctive character.
Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 17.14Unsurprisingly the Court agreed with the examiner, the Board of Appeal and the Court of First Instance in ruling that the mark was devoid of distinctive character.
Tags: community trade mark, distinctiveness,



Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA1039
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive