Log in


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
Siemens wins China TM case against uncooperative defendant

In the latest update from the MARQUES China Team, Ms Haiyu Li and Mr Tingxi Huo discuss a recent case involving the SIEMENS trade mark.

On 22 April 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) announced the beginning of IP Week. It released 10 important IP cases and 50 typical IP cases of the Chinese courts and the Chinese Courts’ Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property in 2023.

In case No 2022 SPC Minzhong 312, concerning the trade mark SIEMENS, the SPC granted high damages mainly based on the plaintiff’s uncontested evidence. This decision may deter uncooperative infringers.

Case summary

Ningbo Qishuai Electric Appliances Co, Ltd, the defendant, registered outside China a company called Shanghai Siemens Electric Appliances Co, Ltd. It used the corporate name as a business sign extensively on products such as washing machines that it made and sold, product packaging, and relevant promotional activities.

The plaintiff Siemens sued Ningbo Qishuai for trade mark infringement and unfair competition. The first-instance court upheld the petition for unfair competition, but rejected the trade mark infringement claim concerning the defendant’s use of the corporate name on products.

The court ordered Ningbo Qishuai to immediately stop its unfair competition and granted damages of CNY100 million (€13 million) plus the reasonable expense of CNY163 thousand (€21,000).

Ningbo Qishuai appealed. The SPC ruled that, as it was aware of the fame of the trade marks SIEMENS in Latin and Chinese characters, Ningbo Qishuai wilfully used the corporate name on washing machines and caused consumer confusion. This constituted trade mark infringement and the use on the product packaging and the relevant promotional activities constituted unfair competition.

The evidence was insufficient to prove either Siemens’ actual loss or the defendant’s profit but sufficient to prove the defendant’s profit has obviously exceeded the maximum statutory damage of CNY3 million as prescribed in the applicable laws.

Under these circumstances, as Ningbo Qishuai refused to provide the relevant accounting data, which constituted an obstruction of evidence, the SPC upheld the first instance ruling and rejected the appeal.


This case is significant in three respects:

  1. The defendant, which did not cooperate in disclosing the accounting evidence in its care, has to face the unfavourable result under Article 63.2 of the Chinese Trade Mark Law. As China does not have an evidence discovery procedure like the USA, this provision and precedent is particularly helpful.
  2. Although the laws have set the maximum statutory damage, when it is evident that the trade mark owner’s loss or the infringer’s profit has exceeded the maximum, the courts may grant higher damages accordingly.
  3. The SPC confirmed that the unauthorised use of others’ famous marks in a corporate name may constitute trade mark infringement if the corporate name is attached to products and has the function of identifying the source of goods. However, in this case the mark SIEMENS in Latin and Chinese characters is very distinctive and famous in and outside China. If a mark is less distinctive or famous, the ruling might be different.

The authors are members of Chofn IP in Beijing and Tingxi Huo is a member of the MARQUES China Team

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 11.55
Tags: Siemens, SPC, China,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA5270
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment

MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.

The Class 46 Archive








+44 (0)116 2747355

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE


Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
Robert Harrison

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox