Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
MONDAY, 24 FEBRUARY 2014
Moldova falls into line with FEMINEGI

EGIS applied to the Moldavian Trade Mark Office (AGEPI) for registration of the international trade mark FEMINEGI for "pharmaceutical preparations for gynaecological purposes" in Class 5. AGEPI issued a provisional refusal on the ground that it was similar to the earlier registered trade marks FEMINELLA and FEMINEX for products in the same Class.

EGIS appealed, arguing as follows:

* FEMINEGI could not be considered to be similar to either FEMINELLA or FEMINEX, taking into consideration: the difference in size between the trade marks;

* the lack of conceptual similarity between the marks, due to the fact that none of them had a meaning;

* the fact that the ending of the FEMINEGI mark, 'egi', was a shortened version of the name of the applicant, EGIS; and

* the fact that the trade marks had only the element 'femin' in common which, in the local understanding, was linked to the terms ‘woman’ or ’womanhood’;

* the products were dissimilar (ie, "pharmaceutical preparations" v "pharmaceutical products");

* there was no likelihood of confusion, including no likelihood of association; and

* Moldova was the only country to have issued a provisional refusal on such grounds.

AGEPI accepted the grounds of appeal and issued a final decision in favour of EGIS, overturning its provisional refusal.

This final decision is important not only for EGIS, which is now able to use the trade mark in all the countries where protection was sought via its international registration, but also as a precedent. Arguably, AGEPI will take this decision into account in future similar cases.

Source: note for World Trademark Review,20 February 2014, by Nicolae Muresan (Andra Musatescu Law & Industrial Property Offices, who represented EGIS in this matter). 

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 06.38
Tags: Moldova, opposition,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA3615
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox