CLASS 46
Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.
Click here subscribe for free.
Who we all are...
MONDAY, 31 MARCH 2008
Poland: are they fencing?
Tags: Counterfeiting, Polish courts, Polish Supreme Court,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA201
Poland: are they fencing?
The Polish website onet.pl reports that the Supreme Court of Republic of Poland will have to decide whether buying counterfeit goods is understood as fencing. This important interpretational problem arose after the recent amendments of Polish Act on Industrial Property Law (the IPL). Article 305(1) of the IPL provides that:
"(...) Anyone marking goods with a counterfeit trade mark, registered trade mark for which one does not have the right to use, for the purpose of introducing them on the market or anyone who is making a turnover of goods bearing such trade mark, shall be liable to a fine, limitation of freedom or imprisonment for a period of up to two years".However Article 291(1) of the Polish Penal Code says:
Whoever acquires property obtained by means of a prohibited act, or assists in its disposition, or receives such property or assists in the concealment thereof shall be subject to the penalty of deprivation of liberty for a term of between 3 months and 5 years".The Republic of Poland is a Civil law country and there are no binding precedents. Also, the Supreme Court's resolution is only binding for the court that referred with a specific question but in practice Polish courts often apply rules that were interpreted by the Supreme Court. Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 13.00
Tags: Counterfeiting, Polish courts, Polish Supreme Court,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA201
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive