Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
SUNDAY, 11 OCTOBER 2009
Community Trade Marks & Designs Ltd condemned for misleading the public
Class 46 thanks Aaron Wood for drawing its attention to an adjudication by the Advertising Standards Authority in the United Kingdom. This adjudication rules against one of the "so-called trade mark scammers", a company called Community Trade Marks & Designs Ltd of 7 Arlington Gardens, London W4 4EZ.  The complaint, lodged by the Istituto dell Autodisciplina Pubblicitaria (IAP), was that

A direct mailing, for registering trade marks, was sent to companies and was headlined "European Trade marks and Designs". Text below stated "Register Community Trade marks". The mailing included details of a trade mark name and payment details. Text stated "Payment due to: ... Total to pay: 750,00 € ... Please pay the whole amount stated above within 10 days. Small print stated " ... This is not a bill. This is a solicitation. You are under no obligation to pay the amount stated underneath unless you accept the offer ... This is an update fee for 2009 registration". The mailing also included an "International Payment Instruction".

 The Advertising Standards Authority upheld the complaint. It said: The ASA was concerned by CTMDs lack of response and apparent disregard for the Code, which was a breach of CAP Code clause 2.6 (Non-response). We reminded them of their obligations under the Code and told them to respond promptly in the future. We noted the ad had the appearance of a bill and stated "Please pay the whole amount stated above within 10 days". We considered the overall impression of the ad was such that it implied it was an official request for payment. We noted that small print stated " ... This is not a bill. This is a solicitation. You are under no obligation to pay the amount stated underneath unless you accept the offer ... "; that text was very small, however, and we nevertheless considered it contradicted the overall impression that the ad was an official request for payment. We considered the small print did not go far enough in removing that impression and the ad did not make sufficiently clear that it was a marketing communication. We concluded that the ad misleadingly implied that it was an official request for payment.  

 

http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/adjudications/Public/TF_ADJ_47036.htm


 

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 20.59
Tags: Advertising Standards Authority, "trade mark scam" companies,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA1451
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox