Issue 094
  October 2018
Contents:
 

Judges questioned in London

>  
 

CTA forum at MARQUES Annual Conference

>  
 

Judges Meeting in Sweden

>  
 

First EU Judges Meeting

>  
 

Team Chair and Vice Chair elections

>  
 

Finnish Judges Meeting

>  
 

MARQUES takes part in SQAP

>  
 

EUIPO Guidelines on RCDs

>  
 

Recent publications from EUIPO

>  
 

Latest treaty notifications from WIPO

>  
 

MARQUES Media Roundup

>  
 
Disclaimer:
The views expressed by contributors to this newsletter are their own and do not necessarily reflect the policy and/or opinions of MARQUES and/or its membership.  Information is published only as a guide and not as a comprehensive authority on any of the subjects covered.  While every effort has been made to ensure the information given is accurate and not misleading neither MARQUES nor the contributors can accept any responsibility for any loss or liability perceived to have arisen from the use or application of any such information or for errors and omissions.  Readers are strongly advised to follow up articles of interest with quoted sources and specialist advisors.
 

9 Cartwright Court
Cartwright Way
Bardon
Leicester
LE67 1UE
United Kingdom
T: +44 116 274 7355
F: +44 116 274 7365
E: info@marques.org
Judges questioned in London

The annual Question the IP Judges event took place at UCL in London on 18 October. Hosted jointly by UCL-IBIL and MARQUES, it again provided perspectives on a range of IP issues from four judges – each of whom brought different experiences and views.


The judges taking part this year were:

  • HHJ Melissa Clarke (Senior Circuit Judge, Designated Civil Judge for Thames Valley, Beds & Herts)
  • Judge Octavia Spineanu-Matei (General Court, Court of Justice of the European Union)
  • The Hon Mrs Justice (Vivien) Rose (England & Wales High Court)
  • Harri Salmi (EUIPO Boards of Appeal member)

The discussion was introduced and chaired initially by Roland Mallinson of the MARQUES Council, and subsequently by The Rt Hon Professor Sir Robin Jacob of UCL.

The discussion was structured around questions that had been submitted in advance by the audience. Some of the questions were:

How much training do you get as a judge? Romania is a country where people tend to become judges early in their career, but at the General Court career-judges are in the minority: more judges have a background as an academic or advocate. In the UK, it is still the norm for people to become judges towards the end (or, if you prefer, “at the height”) of their legal career. However, training has increased lately and there is now a Judicial College, led by specialist judges. At EUIPO, members of the Boards of Appeal must have at least 10 years experience in IP, including five years in trade marks. Most but not all are legally trained (one is an architect by training) and on a panel of three, at least two must be legally trained.

How do you react when you get a trade mark case? The judges variously said they find trade mark cases fascinating, entertaining, relevant to daily life and something they can talk to non-lawyer friends about. But they also noted that trade mark law can involve a lot of technical phrases and tests, and requires a combination of knowledge and intuition. The law is quite complicated (but less so than, say, competition law).

How do you view expert evidence, for example from psychologists? The judges felt the ultimate expert should remain the judge. Many aspects of the law require judges to put themselves in the place of a construct of a person, and expertise should not be allowed to encroach into areas of common sense. Moreover, it results in more expense for parties. Expert evidence must also to be taken into account alongside other factors, and must be challenged: for example, evidence from Google Analytics may be skewed if the person searching is involved in the case and has been searching for the same terms a lot.

Do you have hearings? The Boards of Appeal have only had two oral hearings in 23 years, but there will be another one on 19 November in the MONOPOLY case (R 1849/2017-2, Kreativni Dogadaji v Hasbro), which will be open to the public. Hearings are unlikely to bring additional value beyond the written documents. At the General Court, each party only has 15 minutes to present its case, plus time for questions, so although experts can be heard they rarely are in practice. However, the UK judges admitted the English courts are “addicted” to hearings and said they would regret it if they were removed: they can lead to the judge changing their mind in some cases.

What do you think of non-traditional trade marks being filed as digital files? There was a lot of debate about whether certain things, such as a 25-second film or a voice repeating the same word, functions as a trade mark. In particular, is it distinctive and non-descriptive? And does the consumer see it as an indication of origin. Some of the panel were open to the principle, but others were highly sceptical.

Should disclaimers be allowed? Again, the panel (and audience) were split on this question. Disclaimers (which are available in some EU and other countries but not in the EUTM system) can help to define what is protected as a trade mark and assist the registry, but concerns were expressed that the consumer does not know what is being disclaimed.

MARQUES has an Amicus Curiae Team dedicated to monitoring IP cases and filing submissions where appropriate. Find out more information on their dedicated page.

CTA forum at MARQUES Annual Conference

Between 18 September 2018 and 21 September 2018, at the invitation of MARQUES, Mr MA Fu, the Chairman of the China Trademark Association (CTA), led a delegation to attend the 32nd MARQUES Annual Conference in Paris. Julia Zhong reports.

Read More >>
Judges Meeting in Sweden

The latest Judges Meeting in Sweden was held on 10 October in Stockholm.

Read More >>
First EU Judges Meeting: booking now open!

MARQUES is hosting its first EU Judges Meeting in Amsterdam on 18 January 2019.

Read More >>

Team Chair and Vice Chair elections

 

Finnish Judges Meeting - last chance to book

MARQUES Team members are reminded that they have until 16 November to apply to be Chair or Vice Chair of their Team.

 

The Finnish Judges Meeting will take place on 26 November 2018 in Helsinki.

Read More >>   Read More >>

MARQUES takes part in SQAP

 

EUIPO Guidelines on RCDs

EUIPO hosted the Stakeholder Quality Assurance Panels (SQAP) in Alicante from 3 to 5 October.

 

The new Guidelines for Examination of Registered Community Designs at the EUIPO were published on 1 October.

Read More >>   Read More >>
Recent publications from EUIPO

EUIPO has published a number of reports in the past few months which can be downloaded. There are also lots of webinars planned for November.

 

Read More >>

Latest treaty notifications from WIPO

 

MARQUES Media Roundup

WIPO has recently published information on the Madrid Protocol, Lisbon Agreement and Hague Agreement.

 

Follow the MARQUES blogs and social media for all the latest news and comment on trade mark, design and related developments in Europe.

Read More >>   Read More >>

Unsubscribe:
You can unsubscribe from this emailing list or change the frequency and type of information you receive from MARQUES at anytime by logging into the MARQUES website and clicking on the Preferences tab in the My Profile section of the My Account page.  Alternatively you can reply to this email with the subject 'NewsChannel - Unsubscribe' to be removed from this mailing list.