Sign In Remember me
Username:  
Password:
 

  Poland: act carefully when requesting preliminary injunction...      Octopus Paul (trade marks) - alive and kicking...      No confusion without similarity of marks, as CK appeal fails again...      Facebook.me transferred to rightful owner...      Preparing for the new gTLDs: a survey...      Poland: membership in capital group is not enough...      The weird case of the ZAHIA trade marks applications...      Dismissal of dishonest franchisee: protecting a brand and interests in it...      Greece - penalty clauses and trade mark agreements...      "Absurd trade mark disputes"...     
 
My Account Join Us Members Conferences Teams Publications Class 46 Case Notes FAQs Contact Us

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its third year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 3 MARCH 2010
Poland: trade marks and taxes
The Supreme Administrative Court in a judgment of 20 November 2009, case file II FSK 1003/08, acknowledged the rule that the Polish taxpayer is allowed only for the depreciation of the registered trade mark .This judgment was based on provisions of article 16b(1)(6) of the Polish Act of 15 February 1992 on legal persons’ income tax – LPIT (in Polish: Ustawa o podatku dochodowym od osób prawnych) consolidated text published in Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) of 2000, No. 54, item 654 with subsequent amendments.
The following intangible assets, acquired and fit for commercial use as at the date of acceptance for use, shall be depreciated, subject to Article 16c:
(6) rights to: inventions, patents, trade marks, designs.
The SAC ruled that the priority to obtain the right of protection for a trade mark which is determined according to the date of filing of a trademark application with the Polish Patent Office (PPO) is something different than the possibility of introducing such a right in the records of intangible assets, which is allowed by the LPIT only after the PPO issued a positive decision on the grant of a right of protection for a trademark. Such a decision is always taken after having established that the statutory requirements for the grant of the right have been satisfied. Having only a priority does not guarantee such situation will take a favourable turn.

See Class46's earlier post entitled "Poland: depreciation for registered trade marks only".

Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 10.02 
Tags: Poland, Polish courts, Polish law, Polish trade marks, taxes, Supreme Administrative Court, depreciation of intangible assets,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

  WEDNESDAY, 3 MARCH 2010
Poland: Glazide is distinctive
This is a continuation of the story described in Class46's post entitled "Poland: Glazide differs from gliclazidium". Les Laboratoires Servier from France filed a cassation complaint. The Supreme Administrative Court in a judgment of 16 December 2009, case file II GSK 214/09, ruled that the sign GLAZIDE is representing a creative transformation of the name of an active ingredient (AI) that was proposed by the WHO. GLAZIDE has the distinctive character because it is a fanciful sign and it does not constitute either a name of a generic product, or the International Nonproprietary Name of the active substance of the Latin Gliclazidum (English: Gliklazide, Polish: Gliklazyd), nor does it directly inform about the characteristics (properties) of goods. Therefore, the SAC rejected the complaint.

Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 00.43 
Tags: medicines, Poland, Polish courts, Polish law, Polish Patent Office, threshold for similarity, Supreme Administrative Court, Voivodeship Administrative Court,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

  TUESDAY, 2 MARCH 2010
New Trade Mark Law in Slovakia
The new trade mark law came into force in Slovakia on 1 January 2010, replacing the old 1997 legislation. All trade mark proceedings which were pending on that date will be continued by applying the new law.

The new law seeks to harmonize Slovak legislation with the relevant EU regulations. Among other things, it includes new terminology. For example, the term ‘similarity’ is now used instead of ‘interchangeability’, both to define a reason for denying registration and as a basis for trade mark infringement.

The new law als defines more precisely the rights of owners and introduces a right to compensation for the damage suffered through trade mark infringement.

According to the new legislation, applicants are formally allowed to divide the main application into one or more sub-applications, in order to extract certain goods or services from the main application. 

Source: IP Newsletter of PETOSEVIC 

Posted by: Jeremy Phillips @ 21.26 
Tags:

 

   1 comments:    Post a comment

  TUESDAY, 2 MARCH 2010
Apples and cakes get protected name status
Today the online version of the Official Journal of the European Union brings news of two further Regulations which confer protection on the use of names.  They are

* Commission Regulation 171/2010 of 1 March 2010 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Mela di Valtellina (PGI)) -- the Mela di Valtellina being a tasty-looking apple from Italy.

* Commission Regulation 172/2010 of 1 March 2010 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Prekmurska gibanica (TSG)), this being a delicious and strudel-esque Slovenian layer-cake for which Class 46 brings you a recipe here.

Posted by: Jeremy Phillips @ 08.25 
Tags: GIs, TSGs,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

  TUESDAY, 2 MARCH 2010
Russian Antitrust Commission Bans Chocolates Similar to Ferrero Rocher
The Federal Antitrust Commission of Russia recently ruled that the Russian confectionery maker Konti-Rus violated the Law on Protection of Competition by producing the Esfero Crema sweets (right), which were found to be confusingly similar to the Italian confectionery maker Ferrero’s chocolates Ferrero Rocher.

As the legal portal Pravo.ru reported last month, the FAS claimed unfair competition on the basis of trade mark infringement, stating that the packaging and the look of chocolates were confusingly similar to Ferrero’s signature round Nutella-filled chocolates wrapped in gold foil. The case against Konti-Rus was dismissed as the infringer voluntarily admitted violation of Article 14.4, of the Law on Protection of Competition, which prohibits the production and sale of goods infringing intellectual property rights.

Source: IP newsletter of PETOSEVIC

Posted by: Jeremy Phillips @ 05.53 
Tags: Russia, infringement,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

  MONDAY, 1 MARCH 2010
T - just T: Deutsche Telekom to abandon some of its "old brands" on German market

German news site n-tv.de today reports that German telecommunications giant Deutsche Telekom will abandon some of its "old" brands such as T-Mobile and T-Home and will market its services under the mark "T".

This change appears to only affect the German market and will be effective as of 1 April 2010.  The announcement was made ahead of the Cebit trade fair by Niek Jan van Damme, head of Deutsche Telekom Germany. 

Posted by: Birgit Clark @ 17.11 
Tags: germany, brands,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

  MONDAY, 1 MARCH 2010
New OHIM Online Poll: help OHIM to improve its service

This Class46 member likes trade mark polls, well some of them.  One I have just completed is this one: OHIM's Online Poll: What are OHIM's vital statistics?  What is it all about?  OHIM would like to improve its service and needs one minute of your time to complete its new online poll - surely that is not asking too much....

Click here to go to OHIM's website and take part. 

PS: It took me exactly 1 min 20 seconds to complete the poll. 

Posted by: Birgit Clark @ 17.05 
Tags:

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Ignacio Marques
Jeremy Phillips
Johanna Kauhanen
Mark Schweizer
Nikos Prentoulis
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
1487 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
371 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


- 2010
     + September (3)
     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     + May (33)
     + April (42)
     - March (62)
Finland: City of Turnip Is No More
Poland: problems with agents and representatives
Russia: .РФ priority registration period extended
Fujitsu assigns interest in iPAD mark to Apple
EU holds strong as Madrid system filings drop
Chirimoya among the latest crop of GIs
Moscow Courts: Consumers may think that Kremlin is behind production of vodka
General Court finds similarity between red cups
Spain - Public "strategic plan" for the promotion of IP.
General Court: Board of Appeal did not err in the NOLI/NOLLIE dispute
Poland: problems with colors and trade marks of football clubs
Switzerland: update on health claims regulation
Fucking hell is not blasphemous. Nor disparaging - for hell.
Poland: another judgment on legal interest
WIPO UDRP cases down 9.5% in 2009; number of domain names concerned at an all time high
Google AdWord decision - fresh from the ECJ
Latest Italian GIs protect potatoes and almond cakes
Italy - South Korea Anti Counterfeiting Agreement
Russia: MOTOexpert is confusingly similar to Motoreview
Around the journals -- some recent trade mark publications
Croatia stars while Madrid filings slump
Double-filing of applications: a reader asks Class 46
Sedano Bianco di Sperlonga: mild celery but strong legal protection
Poland: no hidden advertising of pharmaceuticals
OHIM: Proposed change on opposition suspensions and extensions
Some trade mark statistics from Germany
Google AdWord seminar: all welcome
Poland: the law of prägnanz in the trade mark law
Lufthansa's AirPlus International can't halt A+
Poland: nuances in advertising of pharmaceutical products
New Romanian mandatory mediation to help settle TM disputes
Trade marks and taxes in Poland
YugoMac opts for Vienna classification
DG Trade organises meeting on ACTA
Extra virgin olive oil gets PDO
The Polish Supreme Court speaks on reputation and criteria for trade mark infringement
Italy publishes new decree, but no timetable for implementation
Spain - "Look who's dancing" ... in the Courtroom.
Text-book - or rather: porn-film - case of tarnishment
Brands talk to mark World IP Day
Switzerland: adding sparkles to your ad copy is not misleading
An Oscar for Logorama
Poland: the reputation of a trade mark
What do the Netherlands Antilles and the Ukraine have in common?
Russia: Euroset in a battle for a free-ride
Daimler gets a nastygram from Ferrari
OHIM - latest updates to its Manual of Trade Mark Practice
Danes side with Benelux and the Hungarians on ONEL
The second lap in race for Dakar
Slovenia gets TSG protection for Belokranjska pogača
Seizure of goods bearing the EURO 2012 logo
General Court not confused by bottle shapes
When is a device mark not a device mark? When it's seen as mere words
Poland: trade marks and taxes
Poland: Glazide is distinctive
New Trade Mark Law in Slovakia
Apples and cakes get protected name status
Russian Antitrust Commission Bans Chocolates Similar to Ferrero Rocher
T - just T: Deutsche Telekom to abandon some of its "old brands" on German market
New OHIM Online Poll: help OHIM to improve its service
The Panel at BaselWorld World Watch and Jewellery Show
Geographical indications from Georgia
     + February (44)
     + January (36)
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2010 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors