Sign In Remember me
Username:  
Password:
 

  Christian Louboutin: there is no business like (fake) shoe business...      Butter: not that unique...      Pigs and protection: Old Spots get the TSG treatment...      Poland: observations, oppositions, invalidations - who's the party?...      A brief update on Paul ...      German Federal Patent Court: ALLFAcolor v ALPHA...      Spain reduces penal sanctions in the hope of more condemnatory orders...      Finland: Conflict between trademark and name of a rock band...      Spain - Fighting the pirates. Year 2009 in numbers....      Buffalo by-product goes all the 'whey' to protection...     
 
My Account Join Us Members Conferences Teams Publications Class 46 Case Notes FAQs Contact Us

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its third year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 16 DECEMBER 2009
Russia: pledging stars

Recently one of the biggest Russian companies producing cosmetics and perfume pledged its trade mark worth between 5-7 million dollars to Alpha-bank. It follows from Rospatent's documents that “L'etoile” (Л'этуаль) has to pay back 50 million euros by 18 April 2011.

The legislation which allows trade marks to be pledged has only been in force since 2008 and has become increasingly popular ever since. It is seen as a positive trend by Russian jurists and brand owners. They suggest that such a move evidences the changes in perception of intellectual property in Russia. The value of local brands is being enhanced, sometimes even reaching the level where the sign can be pledged.

Rospatent is the Federal office on intellectual property, patents and trade marks of the Russian Federation

Full text of the article can be found here (in Russian)

Posted by: Sasha Yelnik @ 16.43 
Tags:

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

  WEDNESDAY, 16 DECEMBER 2009
Advert for a “Christmassy deal”? Only if you pay 300,000 roubles first...

  In the spirit of the approaching holidays, “Vostochnii express” (Eastern express) bank filed an interesting trade mark application. If a bank wants to use the adjectives originating from the words “holiday”, “Christmas” or “New Year” now, it has to acquire a licence from “Vostochnii express”. The licence can be granted for a year for the fee of 300,000 roubles (about $9930/€6800).

One of the banks that has been advertising its “Christmas Present” scheme, refused to acquire the licence and claimed that the registration of these common parlance words should not have taken place. However, Rospatent (the Federal office on intellectual property, patents and trade marks of the Russian Federation) confirmed that “Vostochnii express” applied correctly for the registration of the words in question in the banking and financial spheres only. Since the words are not usually related to products and services of the kind, the application did not contradict the legislation. Therefore, the registration was allowed.

Needless to say that most of the financial sector in Russia is not happy...

Full text of the article can be found here (in Russian)

Posted by: Sasha Yelnik @ 16.43 
Tags:

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

  WEDNESDAY, 16 DECEMBER 2009
Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement

On 27th October 2009, the Higher Economic Court in Ukraine issued a decision denying the infringement claim of Ferrero’s Raffaello trade mark rights and packaging design.

Italian confectionary Group Ferrero had alleged infringement of its Raffaello trade mark in Ukraine by Russian confectionary company Landrin for producing chocolates which are very similar to Raffaello sweets and for using Raffaello trade mark images on its chocolate packages.

The St. Petersburg’s Landrin company produces white round waffle sweets with coconut filling and almond under its ‘Waferatto” brand, which according to Ferrero are too similar to Raffaello sweets. According to Landrin, on the other hand, the appearance of the Raffaello sweets lack distinctiveness.

A similar legal dispute arose in Russia, where the Russian Appeal Court in August this year decided in favour of Ferrero, confirming the first instance decision issued in April 2009 which prevented Landrin from producing and distributing “Landrin Waferatto Classic” pralines being confusingly similar to Raffaello pralines.

Posted by: Edith Van den Eede @ 16.40 
Tags:

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

  WEDNESDAY, 16 DECEMBER 2009
PDO inspection costs "too high" for HÖLLEN SPRUDEL
Having only just reported on one GI cancellation application, Class 46 already has another! this time it's a Cancellation request according to Article 12(2) and Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006. The subject matter of the application is HÖLLEN SPRUDEL spring water and the applicant is BrunnenVerwaltung Höllensprudel of Nail, Germany. According to the application,

"As proprietor and sole user of the state-recognised mineral spring Höllen Sprudel, Kohlensäurewerk Hölle, Dr. Fritz Wiede GmbH & Co., has, owing to the high inspection costs, no further interest in the protection of this name as a designation of origin under Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 (formerly Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92) since it enjoys adequate legal protection under the Mineral- und Tafelwasser Verordnung (Mineral and Table Water Ordinance)".

Posted by: Jeremy Phillips @ 11.59 
Tags: GIs, cancellation application,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

  WEDNESDAY, 16 DECEMBER 2009
The beer name no-one wants to protect
The Official Journal of the European Union has recently published a most unusual document: it is the "Publication, pursuant to Article 12(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, concerning a cancellation application.

Ankerbräu Nördlingen GmbH & Co. KG in this instance is the applicant for cancellation, being the legal successor to the original applicant, Rieser Weizenbier GmbH, which merged with it in 1997. According to this document:  

"The applicant is no longer interested in protecting the name ‘Rieser Weizenbier’ for marketing reasons since, as they state, for the purposes of selling the product locally, indicating the name is not important because it is already well known there, whereas the name ‘Ries’ is not sufficiently well known for marketing beyond the region.

No justified interests opposing cancellation of the protected geographical indication have come to light.

There do not appear to have been any other users of the name ‘Rieser Weizenbier’ in the past apart from the applicant, i.e. Rieser Weizenbier GmbH.

Surveys conducted by the Swabian trade corporation and the association of private medium-sized breweries in Bavaria have also shown that no other breweries located in the Nördlinger Ries district are interested in using this geographical indication. Accordingly, those firms have not raised any objections to cancellation of the protection for the name ‘Rieser Weizenbier’. The same applies to the Bavarian State Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, the Swabian chamber of commerce and industry and the Bavarian brewers association, which were also consulted by the trade mark department.

The assessment is also supported by the fact that the Nördlinger Ries district, to which the name ‘Rieser’ refers, is only a relatively small area and the designation of origin does not appear to be known outside the region".

 

Posted by: Jeremy Phillips @ 11.43 
Tags: GIs, cancellation application,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

  WEDNESDAY, 16 DECEMBER 2009
Spain - A branding miracle: from bullring to shop windows.

The Spanish company Osborne has started a licensing campaign over its iconic silhouette of a fighting bull, designed by artist Manuel Prieto in 1956.

According to the press, Osborne has granted a total of 20 licences wit the purpose of creating a market of Euro.-10 million for its licensees in Europe and the Americas. Applicable royalty will range between 10% and 12% over sales. Osborne is considering marketing about 500 "bull" references for products as T-shirts, watches, beach towels and accessories, linens, handbags, jewellery, silk ties, glasses, playing cards, lighters, decorative articles and helmets.

Posted by: Ignacio Marques @ 11.34 
Tags: Spain, merchandising.,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

  TUESDAY, 15 DECEMBER 2009
Lavazza to Nespresso: we were in heaven first

In the latest advertising campaign for Nespresso, George Clooney sits in heaven drinking coffee with John Malkovich as Saint Peter and two angels. Lavazza does not feel heavenly peace, however: the Italian coffee manufacturer claims the campaign is a blatant rip-off of its long-running campaign featuring a well-known Italian TV-host talking with Saint Peter about coffee. In heaven. It demands that Nestlé stop the campaign, "or else". Nestlé points out that heaven is not the exclusive realm of Lavazza.

Judge for yourselves, the two spots are below.

Source.

Posted by: Mark Schweizer @ 14.31 
Tags:

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Ignacio Marques
Jeremy Phillips
Johanna Kauhanen
Mark Schweizer
Nikos Prentoulis
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
1433 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
364 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2010
- 2009
     - December (44)
Spain - Court donates fakes to an NGO.
Greece - "skodo" creates a link with SKODA and not in a nice manners says the Greek Communication Review Board
SNOWSPORT
Russia: burgerking.RU does not belong to the famous burger chain
Spain – Want to recover your domain name? Do not go to Court.
An interesting article on IP, private international law and contributory infringmement cases
Latest ETMR now published
Christmas magic from the German Federal Patent Court: "Weihnachts-Zauber“
Can counterfeits enhance brand loyalty?
The battle of TSGs
Greece - Careful with health claims for children food products, says the Greek Communication Review Board
Italy scores three more PDOs
OHIM, WIPO sign Understanding on Classification Synergies
Latest batch of geographical indications approved
Russia: pledging stars
Advert for a “Christmassy deal”? Only if you pay 300,000 roubles first...
Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement
PDO inspection costs "too high" for HÖLLEN SPRUDEL
The beer name no-one wants to protect
Spain - A branding miracle: from bullring to shop windows.
Lavazza to Nespresso: we were in heaven first
Liechtenstein signs up for Singapore
Not yet effortless, but at least a bit more paperless
New logo for Euro 2012
General Court: opposition and revocation proceedings are independent of each other
New practice notice on evidential value of UK correspondence
Consumer error need not be proved in criminal proceedings for online sales, says Barcelona appeal court
ICANN saves some trees
Spain – Leo Messi, from world player number one to brand.
Switzerland: iPhone is descriptive, no trade mark
Use of SKODA as a keyword: infringement issue "unclear", says Danish Court
"Global" infringer sent to jail
Switzerland: SINO is for China
(Almost) anyone v Iranian Tobacco Co was possible
On Little Black Horse in Shield on Red Background – Ferrari Successful as Milan Court Upholds Infringement Claims.
Spain - Court cancels a Spanish trade mark for "D10R".
Poland: bad faith in trade mark applications
VOLVO dissolves SOLVO
DPMA: IP Awareness and Enforcement conference - downloadable speakers' notes
Switzerland: not discriminating against MINARETT trade marks
Poland: reclaim the windows – the saga continues
Finland: The City of Turnip
Cheap, cheaper, Czech: CAC to offer UDRP proceedings for EUR 500
Genuine use of the earlier mark: COLORIS of 2003 v COLORIS of 1998
     + November (55)
     + October (49)
     + September (48)
     + August (39)
     + July (54)
     + June (54)
     + May (55)
     + April (54)
     + March (57)
     + February (48)
     + January (61)
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2010 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors