MARQUES - Association of European Trade Mark Owners


	Poland: the average consumers' confusion... Spain: Hints on how to calculate the “reasonable royalty” in trade mark infringement cases. ... General Court gives applicant the blues... ICEBERG sinks ICEBREAKER: conceptual similarity "not decisive" whether visual and aural similarity exist... Poland: similarity of signs, homogenity of goods... Poland: whose treasure is it?... Berlin Appeals Court backs ‘Parmesan’ label as purely Italian and upholds case against German Parmesan copycats. ... Poland: act carefully when requesting preliminary injunction... Octopus Paul (trade marks) - alive and kicking... No confusion without similarity of marks, as CK appeal fails again...

My Account

Join Us

Members

Conferences

Teams

Publications

Class 46

Case Notes

FAQs

Contact Us

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news

Now in its second year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Showing posts with tag relative grounds of refusal.

Show all posts

page: 1

1	VOLVO dissolves SOLVO
	Tags: General Court, CFI, relative grounds of refusal, opposition, mark with reputation
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 02/12/2009 @ 14.22

2	CFI: no similarity between "MANGO adorably" and ADIORABLE
	Tags: CFI, Market reputation, relative grounds of refusal
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 16/09/2009 @ 11.18

3	CFI finds likelihood of confusion between sensixx and Centrixx
	Tags: CFI, German brands, relative grounds of refusal
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 16/09/2009 @ 11.09

4	Switzerland: FRUCTAID creates risk of confusion with FRUCTA for baby food, but not for fruit juice
	Tags: likelihood of confusion, relative grounds of refusal, Switzerland
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 14/09/2009 @ 10.43

Who we all are...

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed

372 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader

The Class 46 archive

- 2010
- September (10)

Poland: the average consumers' confusion

Spain: Hints on how to calculate the “reasonable royalty” in trade mark infringement cases.

General Court gives applicant the blues

ICEBERG sinks ICEBREAKER: conceptual similarity "not decisive" whether visual and aural similarity exist

Poland: similarity of signs, homogenity of goods

Poland: whose treasure is it?

Berlin Appeals Court backs ‘Parmesan’ label as purely Italian and upholds case against German Parmesan copycats.

Poland: act carefully when requesting preliminary injunction

Octopus Paul (trade marks) - alive and kicking

No confusion without similarity of marks, as CK appeal fails again

     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     + May (33)
     + April (42)
     + March (62)
     + February (44)
     + January (36)
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]