Sign In Remember me
Username:  
Password:
 

  Poland: the average consumers' confusion...      Spain: Hints on how to calculate the “reasonable royalty” in trade mark infringement cases. ...      General Court gives applicant the blues...      ICEBERG sinks ICEBREAKER: conceptual similarity "not decisive" whether visual and aural similarity exist...      Poland: similarity of signs, homogenity of goods...      Poland: whose treasure is it?...      Berlin Appeals Court backs ‘Parmesan’ label as purely Italian and upholds case against German Parmesan copycats. ...      Poland: act carefully when requesting preliminary injunction...      Octopus Paul (trade marks) - alive and kicking...      No confusion without similarity of marks, as CK appeal fails again...     
 
My Account Join Us Members Conferences Teams Publications Class 46 Case Notes FAQs Contact Us

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its second year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
Showing posts with tag life life blog.

Show all posts

page: 1

Medion wins this round in "life" dispute with Nokia
  Tags: General Court, CFI, t-460/07, life life blog, nokia, medion, opposition, likelihood of confusion
  Posted By: Nikos Prentoulis
  Posted on 20/01/2010 @ 14.28
   
 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Ignacio Marques
Jeremy Phillips
Johanna Kauhanen
Mark Schweizer
Nikos Prentoulis
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
1505 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
372 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


- 2010
     - September (10)
Poland: the average consumers' confusion
Spain: Hints on how to calculate the “reasonable royalty” in trade mark infringement cases.
General Court gives applicant the blues
ICEBERG sinks ICEBREAKER: conceptual similarity "not decisive" whether visual and aural similarity exist
Poland: similarity of signs, homogenity of goods
Poland: whose treasure is it?
Berlin Appeals Court backs ‘Parmesan’ label as purely Italian and upholds case against German Parmesan copycats.
Poland: act carefully when requesting preliminary injunction
Octopus Paul (trade marks) - alive and kicking
No confusion without similarity of marks, as CK appeal fails again
     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     + May (33)
     + April (42)
     + March (62)
     + February (44)
     + January (36)
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007
 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2010 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors