MARQUES - Association of European Trade Mark Owners


	Poland: whose treasure is it?... Berlin Appeals Court backs ‘Parmesan’ label as purely Italian and upholds case against German Parmesan copycats. ... Poland: act carefully when requesting preliminary injunction... Octopus Paul (trade marks) - alive and kicking... No confusion without similarity of marks, as CK appeal fails again... Facebook.me transferred to rightful owner... Preparing for the new gTLDs: a survey... Poland: membership in capital group is not enough... The weird case of the ZAHIA trade marks applications... Dismissal of dishonest franchisee: protecting a brand and interests in it...

My Account

Join Us

Members

Conferences

Teams

Publications

Class 46

Case Notes

FAQs

Contact Us

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news

Now in its second year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Showing posts with tag Supreme Administrative Court.

Show all posts

page: 1 2 3 4

1	Poland: whose treasure is it?
	Tags: Polish Act on Trade marks, Polish Administrative Proceedings Code, Polish Supreme Administrative Court, distinctive character, trade mark infringement, trade mark invalidation
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 06/09/2010 @ 18.46

2	Poland: bound by the law
	Tags: Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts, Polish Administrative Proceedings Code, Polish Supreme Administrative Court, Voivodeship Administrative Court, firm, personal rights, trade mark invalidation
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 10/08/2010 @ 15.29

3	Poland: strong, weak, distinctive trade marks for alcohol products
	Tags: Polish Supreme Administrative Court, Voivodeship Administrative Court, acquired distinctiveness, distinctive character, trademark law
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 02/07/2010 @ 18.08

4	Poland: White Eagle cannot be a trade mark
	Tags: national emblem, Poland, Polish courts, Polish law, Polish Patent Office, Polish trade marks, protection of national emblems, Supreme Administrative Court, case-law
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 16/05/2010 @ 20.42

5	Protection of trade names under the Polish law
	Tags: Polish Patent Office, Supreme Administrative Court, bad faith, article 8 Paris Convention, company name,
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 07/05/2010 @ 18.37

6	Poland: time of bad faith in trade mark application
	Tags: Polish Patent Office, Polish Supreme Administrative Court, bad faith, case law, reputed trade marks, trade mark invalidation, Kenzo
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 20/04/2010 @ 19.09

7	Poland: problems with agents and representatives
	Tags: Article 6septies, Bad faith, international registration, Paris Convention, Poland, Polish law, Polish Patent Office, Polish Supreme Administrative Court, Polish trade marks
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 30/03/2010 @ 15.43

8	Poland: another judgment on legal interest
	Tags: Poland, Supreme Administrative Court, legal interest, locus standi
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 24/03/2010 @ 13.28

9	Poland: nuances in advertising of pharmaceutical products
	Tags: Main Pharmaceutical Inspector, advertising of pharmaceuticals, Voivodeship Administrative Court, Supreme Administrative Court, pharmaceuticals
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 14/03/2010 @ 00.18

10	Poland: trade marks and taxes
	Tags: Poland, Polish courts, Polish law, Polish trade marks, taxes, Supreme Administrative Court, depreciation of intangible assets
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 03/03/2010 @ 10.02

Who we all are...

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed

372 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader

The Class 46 archive

- 2010
- September (5)

Poland: whose treasure is it?

Berlin Appeals Court backs ‘Parmesan’ label as purely Italian and upholds case against German Parmesan copycats.

Poland: act carefully when requesting preliminary injunction

Octopus Paul (trade marks) - alive and kicking

No confusion without similarity of marks, as CK appeal fails again

     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     + May (33)
     + April (42)
     + March (62)
     + February (44)
     + January (36)
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]