Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  TUESDAY, 31 MAY 2011
"Unstoppable": new ICANN gTLD draft guide released
Via the MARQUES Cyberspace Team comes news that ICANN published the gTLD Applicant Guidebook yesterday. This follows the appearance of no fewer than six draft Applicant Guidebooks, spanning a period of more than three years -- not to mention the consideration of literally thousands of comments from both supporters and opponents of the process.  Anyway, this document is the foundation for a programme of change that will irrevocably alter the domain name system.

Together with a detailed explanation of the application process, the Applicant Guidebook features the 50 questions that all applicants must answer, as well as the registry operator’s contract. 

If the ICANN Board approves the Applicant Guidebook at its Special Meeting in Singapore on 20 June 2011, the application process could open four months later, in October 2011.  New registries could then begin to go live from as early as October 2012. 

Publication of this Guidebook -- which took place on the 30 May target date set by the ICANN Board three months ago -- does not mean that there will be no more changes. In its introduction, the 355 page document is referred to as “a draft” and further changes are anticipated:

“As approved by the ICANN Board of Directors, this Guidebook forms the basis of the New gTLD Program. ICANN reserves the right to make reasonable updates and changes to the Applicant Guidebook at any time, including as the possible result of new technical standards, reference documents, or policies that might be adopted during the course of the application process”. 

What is most remarkable about this publication is how few changes there are of any significance. We learn that there is going to be an Applicant Service Centre to assist applicants, but apart from that there are few changes of note other than an acknowledgement that the Government Advisory Committee (GAC) may provide

“advice on any topic and is not limited to the grounds for objection enumerated in the public objection and dispute resolution process.” 

It appears that the ICANN staff have pressed ahead with publication to meet its self-imposed schedule while discussions with the GAC which could yet lead to more dramatic changes continue in the background. There will be telephone conferences followed by an in-person meeting between the GAC and the Board in Singapore on 19 June 2011. The Guidebook does finally acknowledge the supremacy of the GAC over the ICANN process, promising that “a mutually agreed and understandable formulation for the communication of actionable GAC consensus advice regarding proposed new gTLD strings” will be created. This is the start of Government censorship of objectionable strings. 

In regard to the protection of intellectual property rights, there is little new. Question 29 of the Application Questions still states that

“Applicants must describe how their registry will comply with policies and practices that minimize abusive registrations and other activities that affect the legal rights of others, such as the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) system, and Trademark Claims and Sunrise services at startup”. 

Introducing the Applicant Guidebook, ICANN CEO Rod Beckstrom predicts “a safer on-line environment”. He says, “This landmark programme has the potential to create more choice for internet users, empower innovation, stimulate economic activity and generate new business opportunities around the world”. This is a point of view that thousands of rights owners might disagree with but the time for discussion or comment is over. The new gTLD process is unstoppable. 

For more information, contact ICANN here or email Nick Wood (Vice-chair of the MARQUES Cyberspace Team) here. Nick, who is also Managing Director of Com Laude, is the author of this note.

Posted by: Jeremy Phillips @ 14.56 
Tags: ICANN, gTLD,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3277 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
- 2011
     + December (24)
     + November (41)
     + October (42)
     + September (51)
     + August (27)
     + July (39)
     + June (37)
     - May (47)
"Unstoppable": new ICANN gTLD draft guide released
Pepekillo v. Pepe Jeans
Poland: Churches struggle
Emram v OHIM: Guilty against Gucci
OHIM Boards of Appeal: proof of reputation and evidence submitted out of time
Polo player : Santa Maria v. Ralph Lauren
Cigars: Cuba Cohiba v. Kansas Kiowa
Germany: When priority does not matter anymore ...
May the Force be with you...trademark owners
McKinley v. McKenzie
Battle of the March
Diagnostic: YGEIA is not a valid trademark
Curia gives ONEL a number
Swiss Supreme Court: ZACAPA is a geographical indication for rum in the sense of art. 23 TRIPS
Poland: Tabasco's troubles
Switzerland: ViaGuara Vodka infringes on famous VIAGRA brand
OHIM- more on opposition procedure rules
TXAKOLI: wines, trials and tribulations
A case of thin v. slim (Flaco v. Delgado) and cattle
Shortly -A new TM law for Greece
French ski: competition in trademark court
Portugal: CORIÉGUS v. COPEGUS
Poland: distinctive designations
Latest World Trademark Review published
General Court: Olymp v. Olimpo
New online service provides OHIM certified copies
Finland - Decision on parallel import of pharmaceuticals
Overview of 1800 decisions of the OHIM's Boards of Appeal (2010)
Won't you have some more.. community trademark law
Battle over wine and Stone bulls
Smart Technologies - CTM filing not made simple
Latest GI registrations published
Sale of counterfeit goods over the internet fought by MoU
OHIM reorganises "to support overall goals"
General Court clarifies 'agent-principal' relationship in the meaning of Article 8(3)
Did you say polo-polo?
Italian Supreme Court decision reinforces protection of design products.
Switzerland: Supreme Court reinforces strict practice regarding descriptiveness
Germany: Die grüne Post ./. Die grüne Post (with device)
News from OHIM: TMview, classification and annual report for 2010
MARQUES comes to Buenos Aires
'Honest concurrent use': Ireland suspends its current practice
Latest ETMR now published
Cost-effective dinner in Toronto!
Labastida: from Door to Castle- there can only be likelihood of confusion
Bosnians take firm grip on fake massagers
     + April (35)
     + March (48)
     + February (32)
     + January (43)
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors