Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 

  Going for gold? Bosnia & Herzegovina accede to Nairobi Olympic Treaty...      Chicken and egg situation in the General Court...      General Court: Spar v Spa Group ...      OHIM Boards of Appeal: Examiner caught in the net...      General Court: La Victoria de México v Victoria (de Malaga)...      Poland: appropriation of trade marks...      General Court: figurative marks B as in boomerang?...      General Court: Viaguara v Viagra...      Bosnia and Herzegovina sign up for Vienna...      Comber Early gains protected status...     
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     
Publications - News Channel
 
Below is a copy of the July 2009 - News Channel which was distributed via email to MARQUES members.   Click here to return to the News-Channel archives.
 

 

    

News Channel
Issue: July 2009

 
   
   
  MARQUES expresses its concern over eBay's recent petition to amend the EU vertical restraints regulation  
 

eBay has launched a petition against what it claims is a demand to end with unfair trade practices from brand owners. The online auction site considers that brands are unlawfully trying to block the sale of their products on online marketplaces, and thus it calls for a public petition to remove alleged EU trade barriers. MARQUES immediately reacted against this petition.  The Association considers that eBay's campaign is addressed to undermine the legitimate fight against the sale of counterfeit goods. But not only this, eBay is clearly opposing the lawful practice of selective distribution. One of the most worrying aspects of eBay's campaign is that it might confuse not only consumers but also EU policymakers.  Guido Baumgartner, Chair of MARQUES has already expressed MARQUES´ concerns over eBay's controversial campaign in a recent interview published by World Trademark Review.

MARQUES is committed to defend right holders' interests before EU lawmakers, and thus it will take the proper steps to ensure that right holders' views are duly considered.

 
 
 
 

Review of the trade mark systems in Europe

 
 

The European Commission is to start a deep study of the trade mark systems in Europe. The aim is to evaluate the overall functioning of the Community and national trademark systems. The study will analyse the impact of the trade mark systems in the EU on stakeholders and could form a basis for future review of the CTM system and enhanced cooperation between OHIM and national offices.

Tove Graulund and the
MARQUES Trademark Law and Practice Team are closely following this and taking a leading contribution. MARQUES has recently sent a letter to DG Internal Market with regard to the review (click here to download the letter).  This letter welcomes the review of the legal framework but claims also for the study of key topics, such as the interaction of the Madrid system with the CTM and national trademark systems; harmonisation of practices; removal of unnecessary bureaucracy; transparency of the finances and financing of national offices.  MARQUES insisted that the study should focus on how to improve procedures and costs.

 
 
 
  MARQUES submits its comments before OHIM with regards to the initiation Note on the Cooperation Fund  
  In its capacity of observer before OHIM's Administrative Board, MARQUES, represented by Tove Graulund, was invited to submit comments to OHIM's Initiation Note on the establishment and operation of the Cooperation Fund.

On 10 July, MARQUES sent a position paper with feedback to the Note.  The other signatory organisations were AIM, Businesseurope, ECTA and INTA. The paper welcomes the Note's statement that the ultimate aim behind the establishment of the Cooperation Fund should be to contribute to the optimisation of the functioning of trade mark systems across the EU, modernising further trademark registration procedures and technology and eliminating unnecessary differences in practice which affect users.  Signatories of the paper stressed the need of rigorous financial controls and transparency.

For further information you can download a copy of the paper here.

 
 
 
  Brand Protection in Germany further improved  
  Reported by Kay Uwe Jonas
JONAS Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH
 
  On 28 May 2009, the German Trademark Act has been amended, improving the position of the owners of legally protected designations. The amendment of the German Trademark Act will become effective in late summer.

Oppositions filed with the German Patent and Trademark Office can under the revised statutes also be based on company names, work titles and non-registered trademarks. Currently, only registered national or Community trademarks, well-known trademarks (in the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention) as well as registrations in the name of an agent or representative of the owner (in the meaning of Article 6septies of the Paris Convention) may serve as a basis of an opposition.
Additionally, an opposition does no longer have to be based on a likelihood of confusion of the newly registered and the earlier trademark. Instead, the owner of a trademark, company name or work title may also claim that the new trademark takes unfair advantage of or is detrimental to the reputation of the earlier designation.

The implementation of these changes by the German PTO is expected with interest. In the past, oral hearings with respect to facts and evidence did not take place. In future opposition proceedings based on non registered rights, the proof of their use and reputation will be required.

In addition to filing an opposition, owners may still claim their earlier rights in a designation by filing a lawsuit or seeking preliminary relief to enforce their rights in an effective and prompt manner.

Only in September 2008, the rights of trademark owners had been strengthened through the implementation of the Enforcement Directive 2004/48/EG. The new introduced Article 18 Section 2 German Trademark Act provides the possibility to recall or remove from the trade products infringing a trademark, a work title or a company name. According to Article 19c German Trademark Act, the trademark owner can now also request the infringer to publish the recall in a nation wide newspaper which might be cost-intensive and have an negative impact on the infringer’s reputation.

 
 
 
   
  Details of all MARQUES events and conferences are published on the MARQUES website at http://www.marques.org/conferences  
 
 
  Brighton2009
15-18 September 2009
 
  Sustainable Brands
A Luxury or a Necessity?

The 23rd MARQUES Annual Conference will be held in Brighton, U K from Tuesday 15th to Friday 18th September 2009 and will look at the importance of aligning brands with long term sustainable business policies.   Topics will include working with charities and environmental brands, environmental issues, transport, people & HR policies as well as food and health claims.

For Full details and online registration visit [http://www.marques.org/Elink?ID=0063]

 
 
 
   
 

Geographical Indications Team

 
  ECJ Decision C-343-07 - Bavaria vs. Bayerisches Bier PGI  
  On a judgment, dated 2 July 2009, on the coexistence of a trade mark (BAVARIA) and a PGI (BAYERISCHES BIER) in Case C-343/07, the Fourth Chamber of the ECJ declared, among other things, that Regulation No 1347/2001 must be interpreted as having no adverse effects on the validity and the possibility of using, in one of the situations referred to in Article 13 of Regulation No 2081/92, pre-existing trade marks of third parties in which the word 'Bavaria' appears and which were registered in good faith before the date on which the application for registration of the PGI 'Bayerisches Bier' was lodged, provided that those marks are not affected by the grounds for invalidity or revocation as provided for by Article 3(1)(c) and (g) and Article 12(2)(b) of First Directive 89/104.

For more information visit the Geographical Indications Team pages:
[http://www.marques.org/Elink?ID=0070]

 
 
 
  New Cases Available  

MARQUES is pleased to inform its members that this months selection of cases, drawn from pan-European and national tribunals, has been added to the Case Database.   This months cases include Mars v OHIM over the cancellation of the registration of the shape of its 'Bounty' chocolate bar as well as L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie and Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd and Starion International Ltd on whether the use of well-known trade marks by manufactures of perfume which imitated the famous products was an infringement through 'free-riding'.  Other cases include Zino Davidoff SA v Budesfinanzdirektion Sudost, Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v OHIM,  Beauté Prestige International, Sao Paulo Alpargatas SA v Secret Spot SL and Imagination Technologies Ltd v OHIM.  [http://www.marques.org/Elink?ID=0069].

     
 

Unsubscribe - if you would like to unsubscribe from this newschannel mailing, you can do so by changing your mailing preferences.  Simply visit www.marques.org/myaccount and choose My Profile and click on the Preferences tab.

 
     

MARQUES, 840 Melton Road, Thurmaston, Leicester, LE4 8BN, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 116 264 0080, Fax: +44 116 264 0141, Email: info@marques.org, URL: http://www.marques.org

 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2012 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors