|
|
The
Anti-Counterfeiting & Parallel Trade Team have published a report on
the
Amendments to the Spanish Criminal Code which will come into force
on 23rd December 2010.
he British Brands Group and Anti-Counterfeiting Group have published a
Manifesto for Brands. The Manifesto contains a six point plan
for the greater creation of wealth, jobs and competitiveness. The
report is available from the
Brands & Marketing Team pages.
The
Geographical Indications Team has compiled list of online
Geographical Indication Databases. The list of databases are
available here.
The
Cyberpsace Team have have published a report on the
Google keyword advertising case, in a long-awaited ruling, the Court of
Justice of the European Union confirmed on 23 March, 2010 that Google's
lucrative AdWords business does not breach trade mark law (Case C-236/08).
Click here to download the report. |
The MARQUES Case Notes contains over 1500 cases and is fully searchable.
|
This months cases include
Compagnie Gervais Danone v Glanbia Foods Society Ltd, Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht, L'Oréal SA , Lancôme Parfums et Beauté & Cie and Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd (trading as Honeypot Cosmetic & Perfumery Sales) and Starion International Ltd, Mäurer + Wirtz GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market; Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva, AIE, Omega Engineering Incorporated v Omega SA and others, Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys' application, Couture Tech Limited’s Application, Hipp & Co. KG v OHIM, Laboratoris Ordesa, SL, Pinewood Laboratories Limited’s Application; Opposition of Novartis AG, Coin SpA v OHIM, Dynamiki Zoi AE
|
|
[View
latest cases] |
|
Responding to the request of
MARQUES (Amicus Curiae Committee), the
government of Poland filed its observations to The Court of Justice of the
European Communities on the question referred for a preliminary ruling to
The CJEC, case No. C-495/09 Nokia Corporation v HMRC. The government of
Poland gave an affirmative answer to the referred question, as asked by
MARQUES in the Comments of the Amicus Curie Committee.
