Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2012
General Court tales: who came first, Pucci, Tucci or Tuzzi?(Part II)

In joint proceedings T-357/09 and T-373/09, the applicant El Corte Ingles had registered the figurative CTM for classes 1 to 45 which was opposed on 18 March 2008 by Emilio Pucci International BV (Netherlands) on the basis of earlier CTM and Italian rights EMILIO PUCCI and  registered in Classes 3, 14, 18, 21, 24, 25  9, 12, 18, 20, 26, 27, and 34.

The OHIM found that the Opponent had demonstrated that PUCCI was well-known in Italy since 1966 for goods in Class 25, in particular luxury women clothing and shoes and held that due to the similarity of the marks (aurally, visually and conceptually), there was a likelihood of confusion for the identical goods in classes 18, 24 and 25 and a risk that TUCCI take unfair advantage of PUCCI for goods in Class 3 as well as a risk of being detrimental to its repute for being registered for goods in Class 21 (such as cleaning material).

The General Court added that the contested CTM had to be cancelled for goods such as toilet paper in Class 16 also detrimental to the repute of PUCCI and for glasses and jewelry registered in Classes 9 and 14 because of the risk of “tail-coat riding” on the reputation of PUCCI because it is well-know that clothes designers frequently expand their line of business into this kind of markets.

 

Is the average consumer still confused?

Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 08.20 
Tags: general court, likelihood of confusion, pucci, tucci, tuzzi,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3278 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


- 2013
     - May (21)
More European GI specifications amended
All smiles in Sofia as e-filing approaches
The unitary character of the CTM: your chance to comment
Moules de bouchot protected by poles -- and by law
General Court: Alicante wine enforces its right against Venetian producer in Marina battle
Houplain, Logobook: for the trade mark lawyer who has it all?
General Court: know your chicken
If you enjoyed our first seminar on EU TM reform, you'll love the sequel
Switzerland: Intel Inside (fig.) vs. GALDAT INSIDE - a Solomonic decision?
BGH refuses immoral "READY TO F*CK" trade mark
Porc du Sud-Ouest tops latest GI list
Portugal: dispute over liquors - the second chapter
New magazine launched for trade mark lawyers
General Court: Endurace v. Endurance (fig.)
General Court gets ready for summer: SLIM BELLY
After ONEL, OHIM amends its practice on use in the EU
IP TRANSLATOR: CIPA appeal allowed
Spain: Likelihood of confusion as an issue of fact? A tale of a dissenting opinion
Coexistence agreements: two MARQUES workshops go live
IP TRANSLATOR: will there be a sequel?
OHIM and national office interpretation of IP Translator published
     + April (33)
     + March (38)
     + February (27)
     + January (31)
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors