MARQUES - Association of European Trade Mark Owners

Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search

About Us

Press

Conferences

Members

Teams

Publications

Class 46

Position Papers

FAQs

Links

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news

Now in its second year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Showing posts with tag absolute grounds for refusal.

Show all posts

page: 1 2 3 4

1	Switzerland: the Royal Savoy of... Savoy, France?
	Tags: Switzerland, absolute grounds for refusal, geographic indications
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 26/11/2012 @ 20.30

2	Switzerland: SAVANNAH is for vegetation, not the town
	Tags: Switzerland, absolute grounds for refusal, geographic indications
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 22/10/2012 @ 17.34

3	Swiss Supreme Court cancels LEGO's 3D-trade mark
	Tags: switzerland, absolute grounds for refusal, 3d mark
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 20/08/2012 @ 19.33

4	Switzerland: another battle in the war over the Nespresso capsules
	Tags: switzerland, absolute grounds for refusal, 3d mark, preliminary injunction
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 09/07/2012 @ 14.08

5	Poland: Internet domains as trade marks
	Tags: absolute grounds for refusal, acquired distinctiveness, descriptive character, distinctive character, domain names, Polish TLDs, trade mark refusal, Voivodeship Administrative Court
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 23/11/2011 @ 16.16

6	Switzerland: Supreme Court reinforces strict practice regarding descriptiveness
	Tags: Switzerland, absolute grounds for refusal
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 04/05/2011 @ 08.47

7	Switzerland: LOUIS BOSTON is not a geographic indication
	Tags: switzerland, absolute grounds for refusal, geographic indication
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 07/12/2010 @ 15.57

8	Swiss trade mark practice against PRO
	Tags: Switzerland, absolute grounds for refusal
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 04/11/2010 @ 17.01

9	Poland: there is nothing new under the Sun
	Tags: Voivodeship Administrative Court, absolute grounds for refusal, distinctive character, trade mark examination, trade mark refusal
	Posted By: Tomasz Rychlicki
	Posted on 25/10/2010 @ 08.55

10	General Court: your lines are pretty, not distinctive
	Tags: general court, absolute grounds for refusal, position mark
	Posted By: Mark Schweizer
	Posted on 29/09/2010 @ 11.25

Who we all are...

Fidel Porcuna

Kathrin Vowinckel

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed

515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader

The Class 46 archive

- 2013
- May (21)

More European GI specifications amended

All smiles in Sofia as e-filing approaches

The unitary character of the CTM: your chance to comment

Moules de bouchot protected by poles -- and by law

General Court: Alicante wine enforces its right against Venetian producer in Marina battle

Houplain, Logobook: for the trade mark lawyer who has it all?

General Court: know your chicken

If you enjoyed our first seminar on EU TM reform, you'll love the sequel

Switzerland: Intel Inside (fig.) vs. GALDAT INSIDE - a Solomonic decision?

BGH refuses immoral "READY TO F*CK" trade mark

Porc du Sud-Ouest tops latest GI list

Portugal: dispute over liquors - the second chapter

New magazine launched for trade mark lawyers

General Court: Endurace v. Endurance (fig.)

General Court gets ready for summer: SLIM BELLY

After ONEL, OHIM amends its practice on use in the EU

IP TRANSLATOR: CIPA appeal allowed

Spain: Likelihood of confusion as an issue of fact? A tale of a dissenting opinion

Coexistence agreements: two MARQUES workshops go live

IP TRANSLATOR: will there be a sequel?

OHIM and national office interpretation of IP Translator published

     + April (33)
     + March (38)
     + February (27)
     + January (31)
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]