Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 25 JULY 2012
France: liberty to use the Autolib mark (lack thereof)

The French capital is in trouble with the branding of its car sharing program, Autolib. Publicly launched in December 2011, this system run by Bolloré, counted about 2000 cars in June 2012 and is set to reach 3000 by the end of the year, with 1200 stations in Ile-de-France (according to Wikipedia).

The Autolib mark was found confusingly similar to Autoliberté, a prior trade mark owned by Europcar, in a decision issued at the end of June 2012 by the appeal court. The court ordered that use of the Autolib mark cease within a month (from the date of notification of the appeal decision, which is not publicly known).

Back in March 2011 the first instance court held on the contrary that, when chosing the Autolib brand, the city did not do any wrong, since it «only followed an intellectual logic connecting to services provided under the Velib trade mark to designate similar services to cars users» (unofficicial translation from a quote in Le Figaro). Velib is the name of Paris bike sharing program, launched in July 2007.

In the city-hall the reaction was a surprised one: a recourse is being filed before the Supreme Court and the city considers urgent proceedings which could avoid its service to suffer major obstructions, according to a statement on its website. On the other side, Europcar owners Eurazeo declared that "it was open to discussions with the city over possible future partnerships as a way out of the problem". According to Les Echos, discussions for a coexistence agreement have indeed started.

Logically, Lyon's eponymous car sharing system, run by Sem LPA, is also facing an action brought by Europcar (Les Echos).

Posted by: Frédéric Glaize @ 01.43 
Tags:

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3308 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
- 2012
     + December (24)
     + November (27)
     + October (23)
     + September (31)
     + August (30)
     - July (44)
HENLEY, HENLEYS and "wrong-way-round" confusion
Slovenia's 13th GI among latest protected names
Brewers mix in over Czech Radler
Poland: Olympic protection policy
Nike fakes hit London Olympics
Natural Beauty rejected by General Court
ARBITRARE with new administration
Stolichnaya and Moskovskaya vodkas return to Russian state control
Never ever barter 6800 Guhl shampoo bottles at the Amsterdam Dappermarkt!
France: liberty to use the Autolib mark (lack thereof)
August ETMR now published
Dolphin in General Court: Hand Held Products v Orange Brand Services
Poland: Teflon's troubles
UK IPO to polish up its trade mark services
All things must change -- even for Thüringer Rostbratwurst
Pie Optiek court qualifies concept of trade mark licence
Red Bull fights
Poland: simple section signs
Just a reminder ...
ICANN's public comment forums: an explanation
General Court: to kill beers with one stone
The IOC struggles with Olympic signs in Poland
Walk the corridors of power? Here's how
Red Bull v Bulldog: Dutch pose question to Court of Justice
Have you checked out the latest EU GI appellations?
General Court: Capri ce n'est pas fini..
Caterpillar takes on fake footwear, court boosts Kosovo's reputation
Poland: the sphere of rights
Swedish sausage undergoes non-minor amendments
Those gTLD applications: a message from Cyberspace
On the General Court stage : Neither rhyme nor reason for ROYAL SHAKESPEARE
Switzerland: another battle in the war over the Nespresso capsules
Going with VISA -- even to Montenegro
It may never affect you, but ...
Who is an average consumer of healthcare products in Turkey?
OHIM Manual amendments in force from 1 August
General Court: Mc Baby v McKids
MARQUES speaks out on IP Translator
Genuine use of a CTM: the Advocate General takes a middle line
General Court: the fruit does not fall far from the loom
The Turkish tale of Wittmann and Littmann
Poland is cool
EU-Georgia GI pact is up and running
Top ten trade mark representatives in Switzerland
     + June (24)
     + May (28)
     + April (34)
     + March (36)
     + February (20)
     + January (30)
+ 2011
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors