Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 7 MARCH 2012
Germany: Your court proceedings are taking too long ? No problem, just sue the court...

Although this topic may be of more general interest (as it concern all sorts of court proceedings in Germany) this Class 46 member thought that readers of Class 46 should at least be aware of the following as it may have implications on proceedings in trade mark (and design) cases as well.

According to a recent change of law in the German Judicature Act a claim for compensation against the State can be made by a citizen affected by proceedings of unreasonable length. Demands for compensation are allowable for disadvantages suffered due to the unreasonable length of a proceeding.

The Court with jurisdiction over the legal matter must, however, first be made aware of the delay by way of a complaint. This provides the judges with the opportunity to take remedial actions by accelerating the proceedings in case of a justified complaint.

If the proceedings are still delayed, despite the complaint, a compensation suit may be filed as a second step. A compensation for the suffering caused by the excessive length of process, e.g. mental and physical stress, will be awarded, which usually will be €1,200 for each year, if redress by other means is not sufficient. In addition to the compensation for the non-material disadvantages an appropriate compensation for material disadvantages is provided, e.g. in case of insolvency of a company due to excessively lengthy court proceedings.

The monetary compensation for material disadvantage under the new regime is independent of possible redress by other means and is not dependent on fault. However, the compensation court will have to be convinced that the claimed disadvantage is actually due to the excessive length of judicial proceedings. Such compensation may include adequate compensation for financial losses. A loss of profits, however, ca not be claimed.

In parallel to the new compensation public liability claims may be made -- as was already the case -- if the delay is due to a negligent breach of official duty. In such a case comprehensive damages can be claimed, which may also include compensation of lost profits.

Maybe most important for Class 46 readers is that the new regime is also applicable to trade mark, patent and design proceedings before the Federal German Patent Court ("Bundespatentgericht") following changes in the German Trade Mark Act and the German Patent Act.  The new law was published in the "Bundesgestzblatt" 2011, Part I, No. 60 and came into force on 3 December 2011. A copy of the law can be found on a webpage (see here) of the German Federal Court of Justice ("Bundesgerichtshof").

This Class 46 member is looking forward to seeing first actions filed and is curious about their outcome ...

Posted by: Robert Börner @ 08.00 
Tags: Germany, litigation,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3278 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
- 2012
     + December (24)
     + November (27)
     + October (23)
     + September (31)
     + August (30)
     + July (44)
     + June (24)
     + May (28)
     + April (34)
     - March (36)
Portugal: the creation of an IP Court - IV
Differences between Italian and CTM opposition procedure
Georgia streamlines Border Measures
Armani in General Court: Why can't we be Amici?
New list of EU mineral water names published
General Court: I SENSE ...confusion
General Court: Bad Faith between FS competitors
Poland: distinctiveness of a vodka bottle
Greece - The new TM law finally reaches the Parliament - is 4 the lucky number?
General Court: when history repeats itself
Brands in China: a special seminar
Turkey: new trade mark blog on the block
Reader's Digest Most Trusted Brands 2012 Survey is out
General Court: Mustang stumbles upon obstacle in CTM law
Germany: Jet and Helicopter as colored 3D trade marks
Poland: bad faith, be cool
Germany: BGH decision on Microsoft's Certificate of Authenticity (CoA)
Even more to read!
Something to read this weekend?
German Federal Patent Court: DDR-Ampelmännchen
HIJOPUTA in General Court
MARQUES Team creates special GI issue for JIPLP
L'Oréal v eBay: Bonadio comments
Will you be in Berlin for the MARKENVERBAND conference?
Poland: problems with letters
OHIM Manual under revision
First transnational PDO registered in the EU
WIPO’s “Appellations of origin” Bulletin
Germany: Your court proceedings are taking too long ? No problem, just sue the court...
Who is entitled to EUROVENTILATORI in Turkey?
Latest WTR: "Is there life after Nokia and Philips?"
Switzerland: NORMA descriptive for ... everything under the sun
January 2012 CTM filings look good
Portugal: the creation of an IP Court - III
MARQUES and the social media: we're here for you
General Court: Servo Suo v Servus
     + February (20)
     + January (30)
+ 2011
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors