Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  THURSDAY, 1 DECEMBER 2011
General Court: SE Sports Equipment v SE so easy

In Case T- 477/10, the Board of Appeal had annulled the decision from the Opposition Division finding a likelihood of confusion between the two signs represented hereunder for identical or similar goods in Classes 18 and 25:

 

 

  v     SE SO EASY

Contested CTM                                               earlier German TM

 

The General Court annulled the contested decision and observed that the Board did not appreciate correctly the similarity between the signs, considering that there was only a low degree of similarity when globally there is at least a medium degree of similarity.

From a visual point of view, in both trademarks the group of letters “SE” does not have any specific meaning in the German language, so it has an average distinctive character. In addition, the consumer will be attracted by this element given its size, position, stylized font and the contrast with the red rectangle. On the other side, the elements “sports equipment”, being descriptive, and “ so easy” being laudatory, belong to basic English vocabulary and will be understood by the German public. The element © is descriptive and does not have any influence in the comparison. Thus the element SE is the most dominant element of the signs and there is an average degree of visual and high degree conceptual similarity between the signs.

Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 16.23 
Tags: General Court, likelihood of confusion, SE sports equipment, SE so easy,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3275 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
- 2011
     - December (24)
Poland: a letter of consent is not enough says the Court
Russians refuse Baltika registration of 'deceptive' beer brand
Gornooryahovski sausage: a first for Bulgaria
General Court: to be or not to be distinctive
The shoemaker son always goes barefoot
Boards of Appeal refuses FUCKING FREEZING
General Court: no Swiss exception
Germany: 3-D is not 3-D if the image is blurred...
General Court: MIXFRONT, VORFRONT, INFRONT
Seggiano PDO registered.
General Court: the return of the King
Poland: Wunderbaum is the reputed trade mark
General Court never tires in Qualifier case
Lough Neagh eels: a first PGI for Northern Ireland
Something to read? Two new titles
Alpine in General Court: don't get confused on your winter holidays
Practical Manual on GIs in ACP countries published
Only Givenchy, Exclusively in General Court
It's already 2012 for the ETMR
Switzerland: best meat in town was not the best idea
Poland: more on wooden pails and their reputation
Poland: KETONAL v. KETOGEL
Philips, Nokia ruling: a headache for brand owners
General Court: SE Sports Equipment v SE so easy
     + November (41)
     + October (42)
     + September (51)
     + August (27)
     + July (39)
     + June (37)
     + May (47)
     + April (35)
     + March (48)
     + February (32)
     + January (43)
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors