Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 30 NOVEMBER 2011
Will Slovakia say farewell to its old domain name registration system?
There is hope that the Slovak domain name registration system will shortly witness dramatic change. SK-NIC (the company responsible for administering .sk ccTLD) is in the process of introducing several long-awaited changes and has launched a public consultation with interested stakeholders (state authorities, registrars and IP lawyers). 

At this stage Slovakia is the only country in Central and Eastern Europe where .sk country-level domain names can only be registered by national, Slovak-based entities. Arbitration proceedings are not currently available; recovery needs to be sought through court proceedings, which makes domain name recovery time-consuming and sometimes rather costly. 

SK-NIC has decided to tackle this and is proposing several important changes. The most significant suggestion is the introduction of arbitration proceedings as a means to resolve conflicts. A clause accepting an arbitration court as the sole and exclusive body with jurisdiction to decide domain name disputes will be contained in the registration agreement. Although it has not yet been finally decided which arbitration court will have the competency to decide .sk domain name disputes, the likely options are the arbitration court in Prague, which currently hears all .cz and .eu disputes, or (by the creation of) a new domain name arbitration court in Bratislava. Given the similarities of the Czech and Slovak languages, a Czech arbitration court could be a quick and easy option. 

Apart from submitting evidence in either Slovak or Czech, a new and very modern feature which is being considered will be the possibility of submitting evidence in English, without the need to provide a certified translation. 

Registrars will be given additional responsibility as regards verifying the accuracy of the contact details provided by their registrants. It is proposed that registrars will bear the consequences of incorrect contact details which are submitted by their registrants. 

Another change which is being considered is an extension to the registration period (currently one year only), up to a maximum of 99 years. 

Cybersquatting in Slovakia is currently prevalent. Infringements are numerous and rights holders have been reluctant to bring actions against the infringers, who use the popularity of their brands to generate profit. Quick adoption of the newly proposed amendments will probably in particular please foreign companies that do not have a physical presence in Slovakia and which are forced to use the Slovak registrars for defensive domain name registration. 

The fact that solely Slovak-based entities are entitled to register .sk domain names often results in a situation whereby Slovak registrars, while “holding” the domain name for a foreign company, rather than leaving the site blank or re-directing the site’s visitors to the rights holder’s original page, “hold” the domain by generating profit from domain name parking or by promoting their own webhosting/other services. When the rights holder brings an action against an infringer, it often discovers that the infringer is actually the registrar who had been asked to “block” the domain to prevent cybersquatting. By deleting the “based in Slovakia” criterion and extending the registration period, foreign companies will be able to hold and administer all their domain names centrally. 

Although SK-NIC is still in discussions with the relevant ministries, registrars and other stakeholders, there seems to be general agreement that the status quo is no longer acceptable. There is therefore a strong likelihood that the parties will agree the new changes in the near future. The date when these changes could come into effect could be as early as July 2012. 

Class 46 wishes to thank Zuzana Hecko (Allen & Overy Bratislava, Slovak Republic) for writing and supplying this post.

Posted by: Jeremy Phillips @ 18.21 
Tags: Slovakia, domain name registration,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3298 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
- 2011
     + December (24)
     - November (41)
Will Slovakia say farewell to its old domain name registration system?
IP TRANSLATOR: the Advocate General's Opinion
Irish Patents Office rejigs honest concurrent use
Poland: a wooden pail can be reputed trade mark
Poland: drugs, trade marks and Internet domains
EU-Switzerland GI Agreement entering into force on 1 December 2011
All POWER(BALL) to the CTM applicant
Trying to ride the Bufalo
AMPLIDECT lacks distinctive character for the French consumer
General Court: Pukka v Pukas
Licences for famous marks: a request for comments
Poland: whoop whoop it's the sound of the police
Trademarks and Monsters and Rock N Roll
Poland: Internet domains as trade marks
The trademark licensee’s position in Italy
General Court: Coto de Gomariz v EL COTO
General Court: Restore lacks distinctive character
General Court: Chabou v Chalou
Finland: Supreme Administrative Court: registration of a margarine brand denied, even though use is okay
No comfort for Dorma as Doorsa mark survives the challenge
Germany: It matters where you cut and pack your meat ...
Germany: variations of a "variable colour" mark...
TDI goes to the Court of Justice: the grounds of appeal
Danish court upholds customs seizure of single fake watch following online purchase
Poland: freedom of speech and property rights
Freedom of interpretation by General Court
General Court: AYUURI NATURAL v AYUR
"Accountability is not enough": but do we need a new brand vocabulary?
Germany switches to the 10th edition of the Nice classification as well ...
OHIM will apply 10th edition of the Nice Classification
Poland: when Biển Đông means something
Beans, liquorice join list of protected designations
General Court: Cor v El Corte Ingles
Poland: there are no precedents, but...
Now it's even easier to meet those judges!
Poland: the PPO's Annual Report 2010 - English Version
France: SYRELI, the new domain name dispute system
General Court: saddle up for one confusing 'cavalo' ride
General Court: Polypipe but monomark
Germany: Apple takes another bite ...
Why size doesn't matter
     + October (42)
     + September (51)
     + August (27)
     + July (39)
     + June (37)
     + May (47)
     + April (35)
     + March (48)
     + February (32)
     + January (43)
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors