Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  FRIDAY, 7 OCTOBER 2011
Portugal: IMUNID vs. IMMUNIQ
The Lisbon Commercial Court (first instance) has revoked an INPI decision which had rejected the registration of the Portuguese Trade Mark "IMUNID" due to the existence of likelihood of confusion with the previous Community Trade Mark "IMMUNIQ", both referring to "Dietetic substances adapted for medical use".

The said decision states that, although there is coincidence between some of the letters in the opposing signs and the consumer will probably associate both signs with the word "immunity", the use of a double "M" in the "IMMUNIQ" trade mark as well as its "Q" termination result in an overall different visual and phonetic impression and, as a result, are capable of clearly removing any likelihood of confusion between the signs.

Posted by: Pedro Malaquias @ 11.53 
Tags: Portugal, Similarity, Court Decision,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3278 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
- 2011
     + December (24)
     + November (41)
     - October (42)
OHIM Boards of Appeal rejects another slogan
Germany: Is "Proti" the German bridge to "Bainbridge" ?
General Court: Back in the U.S.S.R
Darjeeling gets its legal protection -- in stages
Poland: platan v. platanus
DPMA: trade mark filing trends in 2011
BUNGA BUNGA
General Court: All for SEVEN- SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND
November ETMR now published
OHIM's new mediation service: in force since 24 October 2011
General Court: who can see more clearly now?
Trade Mark of the Day
Poland: food labelling
Poland: well-known trade marks
La Sonrisa de Carmen y Bloom Clothes v OHMI
Freixenet, SA v OHIM: Salut! Txin txin!
Germany: Feierbiest
UKIPO issues TPN (3/2011) - hearings in cases of invalidation on relative grounds
General Court: LOOPIA v LOOP, LOOPY
Germany: I might be moved by a movie but IMOVIE is not iMOVE
MARQUES events: coming to a country near you?
General Court: Rosalia v Rosalia de Castro
Trade Mark of the day
General Court: NC NICKOL v NIKE
OHIM: EuroClass replacing EuroAce and EuroNice classification tools
MARQUES seminar on first big RCD ruling
General Court: NAVI v NaViKey
General Court: PIPELINE and absolute grounds
Poland: sunflowers and the Sun
Portugal: Implementation of Project Seniority
Nike in General court: DYNAMIC SUPPORT and VICTORY RED
Spain - Happy Pills, S.L. will be even happier (and will continue using a pink cross to sell candies).
Germany: Bavarian Beer battle still raging ...
Germany: once again the law of people sharing the same name" ("Recht der Gleichnamigen")
two stripes, three stripes and OUT
Portugal: IMUNID vs. IMMUNIQ
Poland: it is all about the reputation
Valencia court takes jurisdiction over fakes in transit
Paki Logistics' appeal rejected in General Court
The King is Not dead, all hail the King
Ara v OHMI - Allrounder
Poland: a letter of consent and something more
     + September (51)
     + August (27)
     + July (39)
     + June (37)
     + May (47)
     + April (35)
     + March (48)
     + February (32)
     + January (43)
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors