Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 27 APRIL 2011
What a ball at the bingo show!

The General Court upheld the decision from the BoA, rejecting the appeal brought by the CTM owner of the mark BINGO SHOWALL, which was opposed on the grounds of Article 8(1) (b) CTMR on the basis of earlier figurative CTM

In case T-179/10, the Court confirmed that the contested goods in Class 9, 28 and 41 were identical or similar to the earlier goods for the average consumer, rejecting the appellant’s argument that users of computer programs and related services, may use technical English terms such as ‘software’, ‘hardware’ or ‘stick’, but these goods did not require the consumer to have a full understanding of the English language.

Regarding the signs, BINGO in the contested CTM will be perceived by the relevant public as a reference to the game of chance and will have a low distinctive character for the goods and services relating to games. Thus, the trademarks have at least a low degree of visual and phonetic similarity since the contested CTM is present in the earlier trademark, that is all the letters S-H-O-W-A-L-L; the figurative elements of the earlier mark – in bold and underlined- do not have any influence in the comparison of signs. As for the conceptual comparison, the earlier sign has the word ‘Show’ which is a well-known word, even by the consumers in non English-speaking member states, however it is not certain that the consumer knows the meaning of the word ‘Ball’. Indeed, in Spanish, the equivalents ‘balon’ or ‘pelota’ do not have much resemblance to the English word. What’s more, some words derived from English, such as ‘football’ and ‘volleybal’ have become ‘fútbol’ and ‘voleibol’. It results that from some European consumers, the earlier mark will only be perceived as some reference to SHOW, but not necessarily related to a BALL.

Therefore, there is likelihood of confusion for the public, which understands very little English or none, for whom the elements SHOWALL and the sign SHOW BALL, share the common concept of SHOW, the element ‘bingo’ cannot counteract the visual and phonetic similarities.

Posted by: Laetitia Lagarde @ 20.40 
Tags: Likelihood of confusion, showball, bingo show all,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3256 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
- 2011
     + December (24)
     + November (41)
     + October (42)
     + September (51)
     + August (27)
     + July (39)
     + June (37)
     + May (47)
     - April (35)
Poland: Sindbad is not for all
WTO “GI register” for wines and spirits: the making-of, part II.
What a ball at the bingo show!
Boomerang look-alike figurative trademark not distinctive
Publication for opposition purposes in Italy likely to kick off in July 2011.
An anti-trademark filing injunction: Pink Ribbon obtains one in the Netherlands
Tubesca v Tumesa (Tubos del Mediterráneo)
Euro-Information - Européenne de traitement de l'information: appeal rejected
Lancôme's appeal rejected by the General Court
Poland: L'OREAL not similar to O'LEARY? Oh really?
Germany: "... a ratio of about 50 to 50"
Poland: numbers, numericals
Will Croatia's intention to protect wine and spirit names affect you?
Germany: A simple "kiss" may be enough to make the difference...
Poland: secondary meaning and distinctiveness - the saga continues
Air France's new logo
Behavioural Index descriptive in the investors' market
Peaceful CTM register
Montasio PDO: non-minor amendment approved
DHL case: ECJ defines scope of CTM injunctive relief
CheckMobile's appeal for Carcheck rejected
Deutsche Bahn "red and grey" appeal goes to ECJ
Amending goods and services specifications: new UK guidance
Plum GI protection for Romanian marmalade
Comet v Comit
Going round and round
Update on the Easter Bunny disputes - Austria and Germany
Finland - Decision concerning trademarks with a reputation
Poland: the courts note differences between wine and vodka
ECJ to hear appeal on "more than mere local significance"
Poland: whose miss is this Miss?
WIPO announces buoyant filings under Madrid System
New trade mark, design laws in force in Bulgaria
Happy birthday, CTM!
Opposition proceedings in Italy most likely entering into force in May 2011.
     + March (48)
     + February (32)
     + January (43)
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors