Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  MONDAY, 28 FEBRUARY 2011
Poland: PIONEER v. PIONER
The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 20 Demceber 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 650/10 acknowledged the rule that the infringement of the company name as a condition to invalidate the registration of a trade mark under the old Polish Trade Mark law is not forejudged by registration of an identical or similar mark by another company. The VAC repeated that the exclusive rights to the company name are not an absolute. The limits have the territorial and objective nature and they concern the actual actvity of an entity that is using the name in question. Only within these limits the collision between identical or similar company name and trademark may occur. So if the scope of business activities of an entitled to the company name and the holder of the registration of the trade mark differs, there is no risk of consumers confusion as to the identity of companies or for example, a proprietor of the later trade mark is not using the reputation associated with an earlier identical or similar company name, it's hard to say that there is the collision of these two rights, and consequently an infringement of an earlier right to the company name. This judgment is not final yet.

Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 22.18 
Tags: company name, personal rights or interests, trade mark invalidation, Voivodeship Administrative Court,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3352 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
523 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
- 2011
     + December (24)
     + November (41)
     + October (42)
     + September (51)
     + August (27)
     + July (39)
     + June (37)
     + May (47)
     + April (35)
     + March (48)
     - February (32)
Poland: PIONEER v. PIONER
Is there a trade mark scam directory near YOU?
Follow MARQUES on Twitter
MARQUES Teams report their progress
MARQUES ACTA workshop
Commission keeps the GIs coming
Rockwool fire ads held unlawful
Poland: precedential case on non-use of 3D trade mark
Fribo v. Friboi : likelihood of confusion
Loft story in General Court
General Court: PPT v. PPTV
Poland: serious reasons of non-use
March ETMR now out
Say "cheese": it's Piacentinu Ennese
Likelihood of confusion between Yorma's and Norma
Roast goose and alcoholic lemon get GI protection
Play-Doh ruling goes Hasbro's way
General Court : Boards of appeal are judges not doctors!
Looking for the final questions for the ECJ in the Onel case? Here they are!
BOIP celebrated 40th anniversary... last Thursday
Mediterranean airlines safe in Luxembourg
Insulate For Life rejected
OHIM Boards of Appeal: naughty decision about the comparison of goods
TLT goes live for Italy on World IP Day
From bad news to worse for prominent Irish newspaper
Likelihood of confusion for Oyster and Oystra
Combination of yellow and grey colours not distinctive
Landmark decision in Italy on partial revocation for non-use of well known trademarks
WTO GI register for wines and spirits : the making-of
Italian Police cracks down on counterfeits.
Recognition of GI Parmigiano Reggiano in Colombia pending
Formula One dispute in latest ETMR
     + January (43)
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors