Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 12 JANUARY 2011
Poland: trade mark recognition
POSTI S.A. applied for the word-figurative trade mark "POSTI Fitea HERBATKA WSPOMAGAJĄCA ODCHUDZANIE Z ANANASEM I CZERWONYM GREJPFRUTEM" Z-334116 for foods in Classes 05 and 30. The Polish Patent Office refused to grant the right of protection. The PPO ruled that there exist similarity between applied sign and the word-figurative trade mark "fittea" R-178995 owned by "BIOFLUID" Spółka Jawna from Górki Małe. POSTI filed a complaint against this decision.

The Voivodeship Administrative Court in its judgment of 5 November 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 1126/10 annulled questioned decisions. The Court ruled that the internal characteristics of the trade mark, including descriptive elements (or lack of such) of the goods and services for which it is registered, the market share of trade mark in question, the intensity and temporal and geographical scope of the use, investments in promotion and advertising, the percentage of relevant recipients, who because of the trade mark are able to identify products or services as originating from a particular company, must be taken into account when establishing the existence (or nonexistence) of recognition of the trade mark with an earlier priority. The Court ruled that the PPO should determine the mentioned above conditions and the outcome will help to assess the risk of confusion as to the origin of the goods which may occur if the protection was granted for the sign in question. The judgment is not yet final.

Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 14.58 
Tags: Voivodeship Administrative Court, descriptive character, distinctive character, similarity of goods, similarity of signs, trade mark refusal, trademark law,

 

   2 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3352 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
523 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
- 2011
     + December (24)
     + November (41)
     + October (42)
     + September (51)
     + August (27)
     + July (39)
     + June (37)
     + May (47)
     + April (35)
     + March (48)
     + February (32)
     - January (43)
Cultivated carrot makes the GI list
Poland: the circumstances of bad faith
New consultation on UK IPO business hours
Armani v Sunrich: when oppositions "over-succeed"
Croatia to join Singapore club in April
Portugal: Notaries are now entitled to promote IP related acts before the INPI
Poland: awaited amendments appear
OHIM Boards of Appeal: likelihood of confusion in the core business
Guide to registration in obscure European places now out
Superman crashes in Switzerland
Poland: foxy consumers
EXECUTIVE EDITION can be freely used
TOPCOM : Likelihood of confusion
Vogue Sapataria case - towards more exigent criteria for genuine use?
FAQs on OHIM's website updated
Poland: descriptive designations
No peace for Buddha Bar in Switzerland
German Federal Patent Court: "Die Alliierten" (in English: the allies)
Poland: actio popularis in trade mark cases
OHIM Boards of Appeal: Leo and the lion
BEST BUY not identified as the "world's largest consumer-electronics retailer"
German Federal Patent Court: "Pornotube" decision
APP STORE: a lesson in hindsight?
Genuine use of PINE TREE by tacit consent
Poland: POSTI saga continues
Can you concoct a recipe from these quality ingredients? More GIs from the Commission.
Poland: trade mark recognition
OHIM: E-mail "alert" system replacing CTM publication letter from 1 February 2011
Nestlé enforces 3D Nespresso capsule mark in Switzerland
Poland: some thoughts on the risk of confusion
Spain - Rate reduction by the Spanish Patents and Trade Marks Office.
Gucci fails with central attack in Switzerland
It's quality that counts, not quantity ...
Chocolates and product shape marks
Poland: well known trade marks
OHIM: Amendments to its Manual of Trade Mark Practice
From shepherds' huts to chestnuts: more GIs protected
Poland: the protection of economic turnover
Bundesgerichtshof - Update on "Goldhase II" (Gold Bunny II)
Poland: cold case
German Federal Patent Court: "Schwarze Eulen" (black owls)
German Federal Patent Court: "Kit Kat" vs. "KIKA"
German Federal Patent Court: "MAR Y SOL"
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors