Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  MONDAY, 10 JANUARY 2011
Gucci fails with central attack in Switzerland

Gucci failed with a central attack on a "G" trade mark filed by the Cofra group (best known for its retail brand "C&A") in Switzerland.

In May 2006, Cofra filed the Swiss trade mark depicted on the right above and subsequently extended the protection through the Madrid system to other countries. Gucci opposed the Swiss registration; the opposition was denied by the IPO. Gucci then filed a civil action against Cofra before the Civil Court in Zug, and requested suspension of the appeal against the IPO's decision in the opposition proceeding.

Cofra counter-claimed for cancellation of Gucci's trade mark due to non-use in Switzerland, and Gucci failed to convince the court that its mark had been used in Switzerland. Gucci then argued that, even if the mark had not been used, it should be protected as a well-known mark in the sense of art. 6bis Paris Convention. The court agreed that a mark that had been cancelled due to non-use could nonetheless be protected as a well-known mark, if it was in fact well-known. However, Gucci had failed to show that the "G" mark was well known in Switzerland. Consequently, Gucci's complaint was dismissed. In an auxiliary argument, the court also denied a likelihood of confusion between the marks.

Gucci appealed to the Federal Supreme Court, but the appeal was denied. The Supreme Court held, inter alia, that the notoriety of a mark did not require use in Switzerland. It was in theory possible that a mark was well-known because of "spill-over advertising" from neighbouring countries. However, it was extremely unlikely that spill-over advertising would ever make a mark well-known. Since Gucci had not filed sufficient evidence to support an intitial claim to notoriety of its mark, the lower court could refuse to have a demoscopic survey carried out, although this is in general good evidence for the notoriety of a mark. The Supreme Court also supported the auxiliary argument that the two marks were not confusingly similar.

German summary of the decision of 29 October 2010  (the reasons only beame available recently).

Posted by: Mark Schweizer @ 11.52 
Tags: switzerland, likelihood of confusion, central attack, non-use, well-known mark, paris convention,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3355 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
523 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
- 2011
     + December (24)
     + November (41)
     + October (42)
     + September (51)
     + August (27)
     + July (39)
     + June (37)
     + May (47)
     + April (35)
     + March (48)
     + February (32)
     - January (43)
Cultivated carrot makes the GI list
Poland: the circumstances of bad faith
New consultation on UK IPO business hours
Armani v Sunrich: when oppositions "over-succeed"
Croatia to join Singapore club in April
Portugal: Notaries are now entitled to promote IP related acts before the INPI
Poland: awaited amendments appear
OHIM Boards of Appeal: likelihood of confusion in the core business
Guide to registration in obscure European places now out
Superman crashes in Switzerland
Poland: foxy consumers
EXECUTIVE EDITION can be freely used
TOPCOM : Likelihood of confusion
Vogue Sapataria case - towards more exigent criteria for genuine use?
FAQs on OHIM's website updated
Poland: descriptive designations
No peace for Buddha Bar in Switzerland
German Federal Patent Court: "Die Alliierten" (in English: the allies)
Poland: actio popularis in trade mark cases
OHIM Boards of Appeal: Leo and the lion
BEST BUY not identified as the "world's largest consumer-electronics retailer"
German Federal Patent Court: "Pornotube" decision
APP STORE: a lesson in hindsight?
Genuine use of PINE TREE by tacit consent
Poland: POSTI saga continues
Can you concoct a recipe from these quality ingredients? More GIs from the Commission.
Poland: trade mark recognition
OHIM: E-mail "alert" system replacing CTM publication letter from 1 February 2011
Nestlé enforces 3D Nespresso capsule mark in Switzerland
Poland: some thoughts on the risk of confusion
Spain - Rate reduction by the Spanish Patents and Trade Marks Office.
Gucci fails with central attack in Switzerland
It's quality that counts, not quantity ...
Chocolates and product shape marks
Poland: well known trade marks
OHIM: Amendments to its Manual of Trade Mark Practice
From shepherds' huts to chestnuts: more GIs protected
Poland: the protection of economic turnover
Bundesgerichtshof - Update on "Goldhase II" (Gold Bunny II)
Poland: cold case
German Federal Patent Court: "Schwarze Eulen" (black owls)
German Federal Patent Court: "Kit Kat" vs. "KIKA"
German Federal Patent Court: "MAR Y SOL"
+ 2010
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors