Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  MONDAY, 8 NOVEMBER 2010
France: fraudulent trade mark filing
When the manager of a company files a trade mark application identical to the name of said company, is such application fraudulent?

The Paris Court of Appeal gave a positive answer to this question, in a decision issued on 4 November 2010 which was recently mentioned in Le Journal du Dimanche (6 Nov. 2010).

Back in 1993, Eric Naulleau created a non profit organisation in order to promote literature from European countries located on peninsulas. Said association was named "L'Esprit Des Péninsules" (a word for for translation could be: the spirit of peninsulas). According to the website Bibliomonde, the expression was penned by Bulgarian writer Yordan Radichkov, in a speech he made in Sofia, when trying to explain why is work was more popular in Scandinavian countries.

Then in 1998, together with Rodrigo de Zayas, Naulleau, launched a book-publishing company, also named L'Esprit Des Péninsules. While de Zayas had the majority of shares, Naulleau managed the company. In 2007, the company went bankrupt. A dispute started as it turned out that in 2003, Naulleau had filed a trademark application in classes 16, 35 and 41 for L'Esprit Des Péninsules. The mark was registered in his own name. The INPI database mentions that the mark was transferred to BARDOLLE GAWSEWITCH & NAULLEAU EDITEURS; the recordal date for such transfer of ownership is May 2008.

The liquidator of the company L'Esprit Des Péninsules sued Naulleau in April 2008, arguing that the trade mark had been filed fraudulently and should indeed be considered as an asset of the company. A first instance judgment issued in June 2009 ruled that Naulleau had not fraudulently filed the trade mark, since he "only protected his own creation, which he freely allowed the company to use".While the text of the appeal decision is not yet publicly available, it transpires from the article of Le Journal du Dimanche that the first instance decision was invalidated. The appeal court considered that the mark belonged to the company. Mr Nalleau declared he was considering bringing this case before the Supreme Court.

Posted by: Frédéric Glaize @ 14.31 
Tags: fraud, France,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3357 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
523 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
- 2010
     + December (50)
     - November (47)
Italian Food Police cracks down on foreign GI counterfeits.
ONEL almost up to the ECJ?
German Federal Patent Court: Lack of signature II ("Unterschriftsmangel II")
Latest ETMR and WTR now out
Smoked prunes, non-bagels and piggies fed on whey among the latest GI terms protected
Kill your hairdresser... NOT
Switzerland: Harry Popper's magic wand no more
Adoption of a draft EU-Switzerland bilateral agreement for the protection of their respective GIs for agricultural products and foodstuffs.
Reminder: the subtle art of comparison, your chance to vote
Gotha.. no GOTCHA!
Poland: the PPO's Annual Report 2009 - English Version
DPMA: Annual Report 2009 - English Version
Administration and Budgets: there's more to Alicante than just the beach!
Italy : Trademark battle prevails over political debate?
GO OGLE domain name action: retrial ordered
Bottle shock: Artesa Napa Valley v. Arteso
Poland: genuine use and formal protection
Nice bottle, but no protection
The CJEU offers more guidance on comparative advertising
The Spanish Patents and Trade Marks Office goes "YouTube".
Polish apple, French olive get GI status
Court considers "logistical hub" for fakes in Nokia hearing
UDRP not suitable to obtain domain name originally registered with your consent
Copyright in trade marks: are there problems?
ECJ to rule on criteria for registration of position marks
ONEL - Pieter Veeze's 2010 Markenforum Speech
Don't miss the Parallel Trade Seminar
Poland: the battle over OXFORD
Deutsche Bahn: combination of grey and red colours remain free to use by competitors in railway sector
More protected names for EU foodstuffs
Madonna: no mercy from the highest court (of Switzerland)
Topshop trouble in Norway
Vastedda della valle del Belěce secures PDO protection
Good news for Greenland, but not the Faroes
GRAIN MILLERS go for ruling on "more than local significance" use
Bulgaria seeks GI protection for Rakia
Surfing and the Greek Communcation Review Board
Poland: WYBOROWA and WYBORNA
National laws on on Community Trade Marks and Designs of the 27 EU countries available in 5 languages
Google : associations denounce the new AdWords policy in Europe
France: fraudulent trade mark filing
Poland: GUCCI v. GUCIO
OHIM: Updates to the Manual of Trade Mark Practice
The Spanish CTM Tribunal on how to prove reputation: "Your pile of advertisement inserts and press releases does not look that impressive".
Swiss trade mark practice against PRO
Nijntje gives Kathy the go-by
Poland: the battle over KARDIOMED
     + October (40)
     + September (46)
     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     + May (33)
     + April (42)
     + March (62)
     + February (44)
     + January (36)
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors