Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  FRIDAY, 15 OCTOBER 2010
Poland: higrosterowanie for all!
On 25 May 2006, the Polish company AERECO Wentylacja Sp. z o.o. applied for word-figurative trade mark HIGROSTEROWANIE Z-311192 for goods in Classes 07, 09, 11 and 35. The Polish Patent Office refused to grant the right of protection, claiming that the applied sign does not have sufficient level of distinctive character. The PPO pointed out this trade mark is built from the core “sterowanie” (in English: controling/steering) and the prefix higro (English: hygro) which indicates a semantic link to the humidity. The sign that is created from these two elements, although not listed in dictionaries, is not a fanciful term and simply means "to regulate humidity".

AERECO filed a complaint against this decision. The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 8 September 2010 case file VI SA/Wa 1117/10 dismissed the case and ruled that both in the legal commentaries and the case law of administrative courts, it is considered in particular that the descriptive sign is one that has the characteristics of the topical, concrete and direct descriptiveness. The topicality of the signs should be assessed on the objective basis and consist of examining whether from the perspective of current market conditions, a sign is useful for description of the goods and if as such it should be accessible to all participants. The rule of concrete descriptiveness states that a sign which indicates the specific characteristics of the product for which the designation is intended may be exempted from the registration as descriptive one. The direct descriptiveness occurs when a descriptive sign informs directly, clearly and unambiguously about the characteristics of a particular goods, so that characteristics may be interpreted directly, and not by associations.

The Court shared the position of the PPO, that the the questioned sign simply means "controling humidity" and thus explicitly indicates the characteristics of the designated goods and can not be appropriated to describe the products or services of one company. The VAC did not find anything fanciful in the figurative element of the HIGROSTEROWANIE trade mark.

Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 01.06 
Tags: Polish Patent Office, Voivodeship Administrative Court, descriptive signs,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3263 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
- 2010
     + December (50)
     + November (47)
     - October (40)
Botumax / Botox
Poland: band's name as a trade mark
Beware of blondes!
Free La Liberté n’a pas de prix
Switzerland: DeeCee Style is not prohibited use of CEE symbol
Octopus Paul's strong brand lives on
Poland: can color be monopolized?
German Federal Patent Court: Cali Nails
3-D or not 3-D, that is the question …
Spain – Spanish CTM Tribunal rules on damages in infringement cases.
Latest ETMR now published
ECTA issues statement on latest ACTA draft
Poland: there is nothing new under the Sun
Top Twenty Court of Justice cases: still one week to vote!
First speech of new OHIM President António Campinos
WIENER WERKSTÄTTE, or the Austrian exception?
Slovakian cheese gets TSG treatment
More GI Regulations protect names in EU
German Federal Patent Court: Annual Report 2009
Nijntje sees Cathy in Court
Poland: the confusion with regard to ENERGY
German trade mark judges: hear them, tell them what you think!
Poland: higrosterowanie for all!
Now Kosovo accepts availability search requests
Most important Court of Justice rulings: have your say!
Estonian Supreme court ends pharmacies' long-standing headache
Battle of Mariefred leaves both sides free to use 'Gripsholm'
Guide to Registration in European Dependent Territories out next month
Poland: whose pony is this?
‘Plop’ says the cork: champagne for Champagne against Andrélon’s shampoo
Prleška tünka gets the GI treatment
Pantelleria caper GI terms amended
Greece - blow against counterfeiters in downtown Athens
Court of Justice clarifies starting-date rules for restititio in integrum
Oh yes, it's Co.No!
Poland: Varna, Warna or Варна
New OHIM forms: “Requesting changes of names and addresses" and "Appointing/deleting/ replacing representatives"
TEFLON owners make infringement charges stick in Russia
Plain packaging: is it legal, is it effective?
UKIPO: Tribunal Practice Notice (4/2010)
     + September (46)
     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     + May (33)
     + April (42)
     + March (62)
     + February (44)
     + January (36)
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors