Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  THURSDAY, 30 SEPTEMBER 2010
Spain - Damages and trade mark infringement actions: when (and how) to start shooting.

In the Judgment of the Supreme Court (Civil Chamber - 94/2006), the Court ruled that the exclusion faculties deriving from a registered trade mark start not from the date of the administrative decision granting the application, but with the publication of the said decision in the Intellectual Property Gazette. This is the "dies a quo" (starting date) from which full enforcement in trade mark infringement can be claimed. According to the Court, it is unfounded to claim damages from acts happening before the publication.

The Supreme Court takes the occasion to remember that section 38.1 of the Spanish Trade Mark Act ("Temporary Protection") confers trade mark application certain level of protection. This section, that apparently was not cited by claimants, reads along these lines:

The right granted by the registration of a trademark may only be exercised in relation to third parties from the time of publication of the grant of the trademark. Nevertheless, a trademark registration application shall provide its owner, from the date of its publication, with temporary protection consisting of the right to request compensation that is reasonable and suited to the circumstances where a third party has, between that date and the date of publication of the grant, undertaken use of the trademark which, following that period, would be prohibited.

Posted by: Ignacio Marques @ 09.37 
Tags: Spain, infringement, damages.,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3296 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
- 2010
     + December (50)
     + November (47)
     + October (40)
     - September (46)
New President for OHIM
Greece - Telecoms keep the Communication Review Board busy
Spain - Damages and trade mark infringement actions: when (and how) to start shooting.
Dutch VPRO television programme Goudzoekers digs into fake trade mark bags
General Court: your lines are pretty, not distinctive
Adam Opel ruling, Golden Balls oppositon now reported
"Nice" news from Serbia
Poland: the differences between trade mark invalidation and the cancellation of the decision
Golf and IP... all roads lead to Newport
A shampoo with a bubble: champagne?
Easydate not so easy?
Viacom to applicant: Ya not gonna pimp yo' DJ, bro
CTM statistics on Slovenia
New Irish rules and application form in effect from 4 October
Are you on facebok?
Brussels approves more GI grants, amendments
Switzerland: use of an image of a fruit on artificially flavoured syrup not misleading
Did you say SORVIR -- or NORVIR?
Switzerland: Red Bull slays Dancing Bull
Poland: the Supreme Court speaks on copyrights and trade marks
MARQUES RELOADED: Berlin brief no.7
Meeting of the Class 46 team and friends in Berlin
MARQUES RELOADED: Berlin brief no.6
MARQUES RELOADED: Berlin brief no.5
MARQUES RELOADED: Berlin brief no.4
If you're in Berlin today ...
Two more cheeses gain GI protection
Kosovo passes new trade mark, design laws
MARQUES RELOADED: Berlin brief no.3
MARQUES RELOADED: Berlin brief no.2
MARQUES RELOADED: Berlin brief no.1
WIPO paper reviews European case law, demystifies internet TM issues
AG supports AB InBev's case in BUD appeal
Poland: informational internationalism
MARQUES Berlin 2010: Meet the Bloggers
A cold confusion and dilution shower for grohekranenshop.nl
Poland: the average consumers' confusion
Spain: Hints on how to calculate the “reasonable royalty” in trade mark infringement cases.
General Court gives applicant the blues
ICEBERG sinks ICEBREAKER: conceptual similarity "not decisive" whether visual and aural similarity exist
Poland: similarity of signs, homogenity of goods
Poland: whose treasure is it?
Berlin Appeals Court backs ‘Parmesan’ label as purely Italian and upholds case against German Parmesan copycats.
Poland: act carefully when requesting preliminary injunction
Octopus Paul (trade marks) - alive and kicking
No confusion without similarity of marks, as CK appeal fails again
     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     + May (33)
     + April (42)
     + March (62)
     + February (44)
     + January (36)
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors