Sign In Remember me
Username:  
Password:
 

  Poland: whose treasure is it?...      Berlin Appeals Court backs ‘Parmesan’ label as purely Italian and upholds case against German Parmesan copycats. ...      Poland: act carefully when requesting preliminary injunction...      Octopus Paul (trade marks) - alive and kicking...      No confusion without similarity of marks, as CK appeal fails again...      Facebook.me transferred to rightful owner...      Preparing for the new gTLDs: a survey...      Poland: membership in capital group is not enough...      The weird case of the ZAHIA trade marks applications...      Dismissal of dishonest franchisee: protecting a brand and interests in it...     
 
My Account Join Us Members Conferences Teams Publications Class 46 Case Notes FAQs Contact Us

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its second year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 21 JULY 2010
Customs union poses fresh threats along with opportunities
In an article recently published online on International Law Office, "Customs union: hidden dangers for trademark owners", Baker & McKenzie CIS's Eugene Arievitch reports on the customs union between Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia which came into operation earlier this month, on 6 July 2010, removing the customs borders between the three former Soviet republics.  While the new union offers advantages for businesses, since it creates a single economic space, it presents challenges for trade mark owners.

Each of the three countries has maintained its own trade mark registry, but that of Russia has attracted the registration of far more trade marks than the other two countries. Now that trade barriers are being dismantled, goods bearing trade marks which are registered in Russia, but not in Belarus or Kazakhstan, might freely enter union territory from neighbouring territories, such as Poland in the west and China in the east.  As the author observes: 

"Such goods may be counterfeit or may simply be third-party merchandise bearing a trade mark which is identical or similar to a mark registered in Russia. Until now, Customs prevented such goods from entering Russia. However, not all goods were held as a matter of course - the authorities detained goods only if they bore a trade mark that was identical or confusingly similar to one recorded in the Customs Register of Objects of Intellectual Property. Trade mark owners have complained - with good reason - about the long list of registration requirements, but the system has proved effective, as shown by the ever-growing number of trade marks (and, recently, some copyrights) appearing in the register".

Belarus and Kazakhstan do have their own IP registers for customs control purposes, but these registers contain far fewer entries than their Russian equivalent. In any event, whatever the effectiveness of the border measures in Belarus and Kazakhstan, they will be entirely inapplicable in respect of trade marks not registered there. Thus, it is vital for trademark owners to protect their trade marks in all three countries through either national or international registration procedures. 

Posted by: Jeremy Phillips @ 05.58 
Tags: Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Customs Union,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Ignacio Marques
Jeremy Phillips
Johanna Kauhanen
Mark Schweizer
Nikos Prentoulis
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
1501 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
372 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


- 2010
     + September (5)
     + August (30)
     - July (55)
Poland: one cross for all scouts
Christian Louboutin: there is no business like (fake) shoe business
Butter: not that unique
Pigs and protection: Old Spots get the TSG treatment
Poland: observations, oppositions, invalidations - who's the party?
A brief update on Paul
German Federal Patent Court: ALLFAcolor v ALPHA
Spain reduces penal sanctions in the hope of more condemnatory orders
Finland: Conflict between trademark and name of a rock band
Spain - Fighting the pirates. Year 2009 in numbers.
Buffalo by-product goes all the 'whey' to protection
Octopus Paul still in the news... and two more Paul trade marks
Detailed affidavit by employee of applicant may be sufficient to prove genuine use
Using Google Similar Images search to find infringing logos
Sprider catches infringer in a temporary web
Customs union poses fresh threats along with opportunities
More Octopus Paul trade marks
The BGH and the story of the lost golden Easter bunny
Poland: secondary meaning and distinctiveness
Bakers to Aldi: you're not baking
Three more GIs for Italy
New .pt rules now in force
Spain - Where is the distinctivity in mixed trade marks? The Spanish CTM Court no. 1 has an answer to that.
E-justice website launched
Octopus Paul trade marks
Poland: dissimilarity of 3D trade marks
(Non-) British brands
Use of PARMETTA for a Seasoning Infringes PDO PARMIGIANO REGGIANO
Use of PARMETTA for a Seasoning Infringes PDO PARMIGIANO REGGIANO
AdWords: French Supreme Court remits Google v Vuitton case to the appeal court
Finland: Customs seized batch of watches worth 12 million euros
Latest GI Regs cover basil, beans and honey
Poland: big advertising and personal rights
The aura of luxury
Finland: The Board of Appeal taking strict line with surname trade marks
First Thai agricultural product on its way to get PGI status.
WIPO launches interactive map of Appellations of Origin registered under the Lisbon system
New Ferrari logo without the debated bar code design
Peter weathers the peerstorm
AirPlus/A+ dispute heads for ultimate appeal
Portakabin ruling: the Court of Justice rules
Arbitration ruling on the transfer of the PUMA trade marks in Spain
Montes de Toledo PDO amended
ITMA, Nottingham Law School offer new skills-base course
Priority in filing: does every minute count?
A pig's ear: Soprèssa Vicentina PDO spec amended
Italy signs up for Singapore
Switzerland: ALTEC LANSING is heard
Ireland opts to retain relative grounds examinations
Poland: strong, weak, distinctive trade marks for alcohol products
Bundespatentgericht: Speicherstadt
Product placement: the new reality gets nearer
The Zappanale goes on!
Switzerland: CAPRI is misleading geographic indication for tobacco
German Federal Patent Court : "Schusswaffe"
     + June (40)
     + May (33)
     + April (42)
     + March (62)
     + February (44)
     + January (36)
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2010 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors