Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  TUESDAY, 25 MAY 2010
Finland: Supreme Court ends battle of margarine brands

In its decision S2007/386 of February 19, 2010 the Finnish Supreme Court upheld the decision of Court of Appeal in the dispute between two dairy industry companies Valio Oy and Arla Ingman Oy Ab. The dispute was initiated by Valio Oy, which claimed that Ingman Oy’s use of its registered mark INGMARIINI for similar goods in class 29 i.e. margarines, infringed Valio’s rights to the earlier registered trademarks VOIMARIINI, MARIINI and OIVARIINI.  Additionally, Valio Oy argued that the marks VOIMARIINI and OIVARIINI should be considered marks with reputation in Finland.

In response to the question regarding the reputation of appellant´s marks, the Supreme Court confirmed the opinion of lower courts; both VOIMARIINI and OIVARIINI had the status of a mark with reputation.

While considering the similarities between the marks and goods covered by the registrations, the Court did not find any likelihood of confusion between the marks even though the goods concerned were similar.  The conclusion of comparison of the signs was that there was some degree of similarity as the marks shared the ending –MARIINI/-RIINI. However, this part of the words was considered to be less distinctive as it referred to the Finnish word “margariini” (margarine) which describe the goods. The Court stated that the beginnings of the marks differed a lot from each and as a whole the marks were dissimilar.

An interesting detail in the reasoning of the Supreme Court was that it mentioned that the average Finnish consumer would recognize both companies as being important producers of margarines and other dairy products and therefore they would not confuse the marks of these manufacturers with each other.

Posted by: Johanna Kauhanen @ 13.21 
Tags: Finland, likelihood of confusion,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3356 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
523 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
- 2010
     + December (50)
     + November (47)
     + October (40)
     + September (46)
     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     - May (33)
Council of the European Union asks Commission for trade mark reforms
Appointment of President and senior posts at OHIM: it's official
Free speech : trade mark rights 6:0
Austria: opposition possible from 1 July 2010
Italian law amends Italian PDO/PGI system for wines.
Yearly Overview - Decisions of the Boards of Appeal - 2009
Finland: Supreme Court ends battle of margarine brands
General Court: MEMORY
To name a car - not so easy after all
Oréal v Bellure: strong criticism for the European Court of Justice
Lego win bestcheaplego.com domain name
Poland: protect your trade marks and brands or...
Spain - Do not mess with the city of Tarragona (unless the Municipality let you do it).
Switzerland: this G wasn't stylish enough
The Nokia Case: Poland makes its submission to the ECJ
Serbia's new GI law: some details
Poland: White Eagle cannot be a trade mark
Chestnuts, olive oil gain GI protection
Brand new: Innovation in a Changing World
New amending Regulation on wine sector designations
Russia: 2 first .рф websites are working!
"Breaking down doors": making in-house TM counsel's voice heard
Challenging Community designs: when a 3D mark can be vital
Hops, fowl and cake get GI protection
Finland: centralized IPR court one step closer
Spain – The Supreme Court clarifies on when to start a civil trade mark infringement case.
Protection of trade names under the Polish law
“α” for alcohol: the opinion of the Advocate General in OHIM v BORCO
USSR coat of arms "contrary to public policy", rules OHIM
Switzerland: prayers to Madonna didn't help
MARQUES Reloaded: register now!
MARQUES Amicus brief for OMEL/ONEL
UK: Gmail settlement reached
     + April (42)
     + March (62)
     + February (44)
     + January (36)
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors