Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  TUESDAY, 18 MAY 2010
Spain - Do not mess with the city of Tarragona (unless the Municipality let you do it).

In a Judgment dated January 25, 2010 (cassational appeal no.1007/2009), and overturning prior decisions of the lower Court and the Spanish Patents and Trade Marks Office, the Supreme Court has awarded the appeal filed by the Municipality of Tarragona and has refused the Spanish mark no. 2620427 "MOSTRA TARRAGONA PESCADORA I MARINERA" (my free translation "Fishing and Maritime Tarragona Fair") in classes 16 and 35.

The Court found that the challenged mark infringed article 5.1 g) of the Spanish Trade Mark Act that states:

The following signs may not be registered as a trademark:

(g) those which may mislead the public, for example as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of the good or service;

By applying this absolute ground for refusal to the case, the Court stated that the challenged mark could be "misleading" to the public as it will lead consumers to assume that the Municipality of Tarragona is endorsing the fair, that would represent to be "official", not being the case.

Posted by: Ignacio Marques @ 11.33 
Tags: Spain, absolute grounds for refusal.,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3286 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
519 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
- 2010
     + December (50)
     + November (47)
     + October (40)
     + September (46)
     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     - May (33)
Council of the European Union asks Commission for trade mark reforms
Appointment of President and senior posts at OHIM: it's official
Free speech : trade mark rights 6:0
Austria: opposition possible from 1 July 2010
Italian law amends Italian PDO/PGI system for wines.
Yearly Overview - Decisions of the Boards of Appeal - 2009
Finland: Supreme Court ends battle of margarine brands
General Court: MEMORY
To name a car - not so easy after all
Oréal v Bellure: strong criticism for the European Court of Justice
Lego win bestcheaplego.com domain name
Poland: protect your trade marks and brands or...
Spain - Do not mess with the city of Tarragona (unless the Municipality let you do it).
Switzerland: this G wasn't stylish enough
The Nokia Case: Poland makes its submission to the ECJ
Serbia's new GI law: some details
Poland: White Eagle cannot be a trade mark
Chestnuts, olive oil gain GI protection
Brand new: Innovation in a Changing World
New amending Regulation on wine sector designations
Russia: 2 first .рф websites are working!
"Breaking down doors": making in-house TM counsel's voice heard
Challenging Community designs: when a 3D mark can be vital
Hops, fowl and cake get GI protection
Finland: centralized IPR court one step closer
Spain – The Supreme Court clarifies on when to start a civil trade mark infringement case.
Protection of trade names under the Polish law
“α” for alcohol: the opinion of the Advocate General in OHIM v BORCO
USSR coat of arms "contrary to public policy", rules OHIM
Switzerland: prayers to Madonna didn't help
MARQUES Reloaded: register now!
MARQUES Amicus brief for OMEL/ONEL
UK: Gmail settlement reached
     + April (42)
     + March (62)
     + February (44)
     + January (36)
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors