Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  FRIDAY, 12 MARCH 2010
Trade marks and taxes in Poland
A taxpayer being also an entrepreneur has requested the Director of the Tax Chamber in Warsaw to issue an interpretation to a question whether by contributing a trade mark to a general partnership (ordinary partnership), he would receive a revenue that is subject to personal tax income. The right of protection for a trademark was granted by the Polish Patent Office. The taxpayer received revenue from licensing the use of that trade mark. However, he decided to form a general partnership, to which he wanted to make a contribution in a trade mark, based on its market value. The partnership would treat such trade mark as a legal and intangible asset and would make it available to other entities under a license agreement. The entrepreneur was also considering the possibility to sale his right of protection for the trade mark to another entity if the general partnership would not count it as the intangible asset.

He argued that making a contribution to a partnership, such as general or ordinary one (these are not having a status of a legal person), is not a source of revenue in personal income tax. His opinion was based on provisions of the Polish Act on Personal Income Tax which says that revenues from financial capital shall be par value of shares (stocks) of an incorporated company or shares of a cooperative received in exchange for a non-financial contribution.

The Director of the Tax Chamber in Warsaw in the interpretation of 25 June 2009, no. IPPB1/415-288/09-2/AG, concluded that the contribution of a trade mark to a general partnership is considered as a sale. The value of a trade mark that was established in the partnership contract serves as a basis to set the revenue from financial capital. Therefore, it is a revenue from commercial activity of a contributing person. The Director of the Tax Chamber referred to the Commercial Companies Code, under which the general partnership is a partnership, which may on its own behalf acquire the rights, including real property and other property rights, to incur obligations, may sue and to be sued – it has legal capacity but not the legal personality (a private company not an incorporated one). A non-financial contribution causes a transfer the ownership of things or rights to a general partnership because the capital share of the partner shall equal the value of the contribution effectively made. From the viewpoint of the civil law regulations, it is a payable sale of things or rights. Because the general partnership has no legal personality separate from its partners, therefore is not subject to personal tax income. Only partners are subject to personal tax income in such case.

Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 15.04 
Tags: Poland, tax law, value of trade mark, Tax Chamber, personal income tax, legal entity, general partnership, Polish law,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3298 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
519 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
- 2010
     + December (50)
     + November (47)
     + October (40)
     + September (46)
     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     + May (33)
     + April (42)
     - March (62)
Finland: City of Turnip Is No More
Poland: problems with agents and representatives
Russia: .РФ priority registration period extended
Fujitsu assigns interest in iPAD mark to Apple
EU holds strong as Madrid system filings drop
Chirimoya among the latest crop of GIs
Moscow Courts: Consumers may think that Kremlin is behind production of vodka
General Court finds similarity between red cups
Spain - Public "strategic plan" for the promotion of IP.
General Court: Board of Appeal did not err in the NOLI/NOLLIE dispute
Poland: problems with colors and trade marks of football clubs
Switzerland: update on health claims regulation
Fucking hell is not blasphemous. Nor disparaging - for hell.
Poland: another judgment on legal interest
WIPO UDRP cases down 9.5% in 2009; number of domain names concerned at an all time high
Google AdWord decision - fresh from the ECJ
Latest Italian GIs protect potatoes and almond cakes
Italy - South Korea Anti Counterfeiting Agreement
Russia: MOTOexpert is confusingly similar to Motoreview
Around the journals -- some recent trade mark publications
Croatia stars while Madrid filings slump
Double-filing of applications: a reader asks Class 46
Sedano Bianco di Sperlonga: mild celery but strong legal protection
Poland: no hidden advertising of pharmaceuticals
OHIM: Proposed change on opposition suspensions and extensions
Some trade mark statistics from Germany
Google AdWord seminar: all welcome
Poland: the law of prägnanz in the trade mark law
Lufthansa's AirPlus International can't halt A+
Poland: nuances in advertising of pharmaceutical products
New Romanian mandatory mediation to help settle TM disputes
Trade marks and taxes in Poland
YugoMac opts for Vienna classification
DG Trade organises meeting on ACTA
Extra virgin olive oil gets PDO
The Polish Supreme Court speaks on reputation and criteria for trade mark infringement
Italy publishes new decree, but no timetable for implementation
Spain - "Look who's dancing" ... in the Courtroom.
Text-book - or rather: porn-film - case of tarnishment
Brands talk to mark World IP Day
Switzerland: adding sparkles to your ad copy is not misleading
An Oscar for Logorama
Poland: the reputation of a trade mark
What do the Netherlands Antilles and the Ukraine have in common?
Russia: Euroset in a battle for a free-ride
Daimler gets a nastygram from Ferrari
OHIM - latest updates to its Manual of Trade Mark Practice
Danes side with Benelux and the Hungarians on ONEL
The second lap in race for Dakar
Slovenia gets TSG protection for Belokranjska pogača
Seizure of goods bearing the EURO 2012 logo
General Court not confused by bottle shapes
When is a device mark not a device mark? When it's seen as mere words
Poland: trade marks and taxes
Poland: Glazide is distinctive
New Trade Mark Law in Slovakia
Apples and cakes get protected name status
Russian Antitrust Commission Bans Chocolates Similar to Ferrero Rocher
T - just T: Deutsche Telekom to abandon some of its "old brands" on German market
New OHIM Online Poll: help OHIM to improve its service
The Panel at BaselWorld World Watch and Jewellery Show
Geographical indications from Georgia
     + February (44)
     + January (36)
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors