Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  MONDAY, 25 JANUARY 2010
Spain – About Trade Mark Law, the Guggenheim museum and “tapas” (not kidding).

This blogger has read the Spanish newspaper El Economista and found a curious case to report from Spain concerning the famous Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao.

The Spanish Supreme Court (Contentious-administrative Chamber) has recently dismissed the appeal filed by the owner of the “Guggenheim” Spanish trademarks against the registration of the Spanish trade mark for “El huevo frito Indautxu El Huevonheim” for class 43 (bar services, amongst others).

The challenged trade mark deserves some explanation – it reads “El huevo frito” (fried egg) plus “Indautxu” (the name of the district where the Guggenheim Bilbao museum in Bilbao is located – and the applicant is seated there, too) plus “El Huevonheim” ( “The eggnheim”?). So translated the challenged mark would read (in my free adaptation) “The Eggnheim - the fried egg from Indautxu”, being the name of a bar.

A gastronomical note: one of the Spanish culinaire glories are the “tapas”. One of the places to go in the quest for the best “tapas” is the Basque Country (Euskadi - "tapas" are called there "pintxos"), being Bilbao its most populous city and the seat of a remarkable Guggenheim museum. And certainly a good place to go “tapas” (this blogger can tell). Below an example - is this the "Eggnheim" tapa?

Having a branded bar so called in the museum surrounding seemed not to please the management of the world-renown museum. This is probably the application for registration of “El huevo frito Indautxu El Huevonheim” was (unsuccessfully) challenged by the foundation managing the Guggenheim museum not only before the Spanish Trade Marks and Patents Office, but also before the Courts of Justice.

According to the press report, the Supreme Court found that “El huevo frito Indautxu El Huevonheim” mark differed significantly from the prior “Guggenheim” marks. The mere coincidence in the “nheim” suffix in of the terms of the later trade mark (Guggenheim vs Huevonheim) was not enough to generate a “reasonable and objective” risk of confusion.

Posted by: Ignacio Marques @ 09.24 
Tags: Spain, relative grounds for refusal.,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3308 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
- 2010
     + December (50)
     + November (47)
     + October (40)
     + September (46)
     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     + May (33)
     + April (42)
     + March (62)
     + February (44)
     - January (36)
Du Pareil au même fails to ensure trade mark protection against Zara France
Apple in trade mark troubles over iPAD name?
'Genuine use': MARQUES speaks out
Italian Data Protection Authority establishes illegality of publication of photographs taken in violation of privacy of actor, George Clooney
Spain - On well-known marks: size does matter.
Don't forget the Business and Consumer Regs
New IP laws for Bosnia?
Onel vs Omel - OHIM strikes back and BOIP publishes English and French translations
Onel vs Omel: Not Normal - The BOIP's Decision in English Translation
Spain – About Trade Mark Law, the Guggenheim museum and “tapas” (not kidding).
Your comments are welcome!
Onel vs Omel: not Normal?
Greece - 512.000 packs of counterfeit cigarettes seized at the Piraeus Customs
Most embarrassing cease and desist letter ever?
Audi wins 'Vorsprung durch Technik’ appeal
Russia: Cybersquatters, beware! Courts may not be stopping at the statutory compensation limit anymore
Mail.ru can be protected forever!
Medion wins this round in "life" dispute with Nokia
CHESHIRE CAT a geographic indication?
You can't dilute Vodka with Vodkat
Finland: UNION reincarnated
Polish court rules on trade mark use
Does the ICC Code on Advertising and Marketing lack a sense of humour?
Greece - The industry organizes seminar on counterfeiting in Thessaloniki
BGH rules in the Opel/Autec toy car case
Czechs keep cheese GI, to disappointment of Slovakia
OHIM contribution to Commission study on European trade mark system now available
Switzerland: registration in bad faith no argument in opposition proceedings
Ouzaki's not ouzo -- and it's not Greek either
The Polish TIFFANY's trade marks saga continues
Cheese and nuts get PDO protection
Serbia gets a new trade mark law
Trade marks of Russian beer can now be used by a Kazakh brewery
Protecting trade marks against company names: the first 75 UK decisions
Poland: first judgment on differences between sponsorship and advertising of pharmaceutical product
Latest Trademark World
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors