Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 6 JANUARY 2010
Poland: first judgment on differences between sponsorship and advertising of pharmaceutical product
A Polish court has issued its first judgment regarding TV/radio sponsored programs and advertising of pharmaceutical products.

US Pharmacia Company prepared a TV spot that was aired with a TV show. The following statement appeared in the spot:
The programme is sponsored by the manufacturer of Apap Noc medicine. Apap Noc – now also available in the big package. Combats pain and helps you fall asleep.
 According to article 17(1) of the Polish Law on Broadcasting – LOB - (in Polish: Ustawa o radiofonii i telewizji) of 29 December 1992, Journal of Law (Dziennik Ustaw) of 1993, No 7 item 34, consolidated text of 19 Novemver 2004, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 253 item 2531, with later amendments, sponsored programmes or other broadcasts shall be identified as such by sponsor credits at their beginning or end. Such credits may specify only the sponsor’s name, business name, trademark or contain some other identification of the business operator or its business activities, the image of a single product or service.

According to article 4 pt. 7 of the LOB, the "sponsorship" shall mean a direct or indirect financing or co-financing of the production or transmission of a programme or other broadcasts by an entity other than the broadcaster or producer of the programme, with a view to establishing, enhancing or promoting the renown of the name, business name, product or service, trademark.

The Polish Act on Pharmaceutical Law – PHL - (in Polish: ustawa prawo famraceutyczne) of 6 September 2001, published in Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) of 2008, No 45, item 271, with later amendments, does not include provisions relating to sponsorship of programs or other broadcasts in radio and television.

The Main Pharmaceutical Inspector (MPI) is the central organ of public administration authorized to ensure compliance with pharmaceutical regulations in the context of advertising. According to MPI many pharmaceutical companies are trying to skip the strict sponsorship rules for advertising of pharmaceutical/ medicinal products. MPI has already delivered several decisions requiring pharmaceutical companies to immediately cease advertising of medicines, and only US Pharmacia appealed this decision to the Voivodeship Administrative Court. The company argued that the spot was aimed at enhancing the reputation of the medicinal product. The MPI argued that it is unacceptable to add any other indications relating to both the sponsor and the subject of its activities, in particular the goods and services. Such behaviour turns sponsorship into advertising activity.

The VAC in a judgment of December 2009, case act signature VI SA Wa 1758/09, ruled that the sponsorship cannot be used an unacceptable advertisement. It has to be a form of promotion separated from advertising. The content and meaning of communication and the message broadcasted decides whether we are dealing with advertising or with corporate sponsorships. The Court also emphasized that each the advertising of medicinal product has to be made in accordance with the current Regulation of the Minister of Health on the advertising of medicinal products of 21 November 2008, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No 210 item 1327. The advertising of a medicinal product targeted to the public must contain the following essential information:
  • the name of the medicinal product
  • the INN of the active substanc, in the case of medicinal products containing more than 3 active substances, the term "complex product"
  • the dose of the active substance or active substance concentrations, with the exception of a complex product
  • pharmaceutical form of the product
  • indication or indications for therapeutic use
  • contraindications
  • identification of the responsible entity
The advertising of medicinal product targeted to the public that is made in the audio-visual form additionally has to contain a warning of the following content:
Before use read the leaflet included in the package or consult with your doctor or pharmacist, as each drug that was used improperly may threaten your life or health.
This warning shall be placed in the bottom of the ad, in terms of representing not less than 20% of its surface, so as to make the text stand out from the background plane visible, legible, motionless, placed horizontally, the distance of letters from the top and bottom edge of the background plane ad cannot be bigger than 1/2 in height and the distance between the lines of the string cannot be bigger than the height of the letters. This warning must be read clearly in the Polish language and it has to appear on the screen no less than 8 seconds. The same rules regarding the warning apply to the advertising of a medicinal product targeted to the public that was prepared as a sound message.

Advertising products targeted to the public in a static visual form, shall contain a warning stating:

Before use read the label, which includes indications, contraindications, data on adverse effects and dosage and information about the medicinal product, or consult a doctor or pharmacist, as each drug used improperly threatening your life or health.
The Warning must be placed in the bottom of the ad, in terms of representing not less than 10% of its surface in such a way as to make the text stand out from the background plane visible, legible, motionless, placed horizontally, the distance of letters from the top and bottom edges of the background plane of the ad cannot be bigger than 1/2 in height and the distance between lines of the inscription cannot be bigger than the height of the letters. In the case of advertising to the public in a visual form which includes more than one page, a warning has to be placed on the first page.

Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 12.46 
Tags: advertising, drugs, Poland, Polish courts, advertising standards, medicines, Voivodeiship Administrative Court, pharmaceuticals, Main Pharmaceutical Inspector,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3352 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
523 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
- 2010
     + December (50)
     + November (47)
     + October (40)
     + September (46)
     + August (30)
     + July (55)
     + June (40)
     + May (33)
     + April (42)
     + March (62)
     + February (44)
     - January (36)
Du Pareil au même fails to ensure trade mark protection against Zara France
Apple in trade mark troubles over iPAD name?
'Genuine use': MARQUES speaks out
Italian Data Protection Authority establishes illegality of publication of photographs taken in violation of privacy of actor, George Clooney
Spain - On well-known marks: size does matter.
Don't forget the Business and Consumer Regs
New IP laws for Bosnia?
Onel vs Omel - OHIM strikes back and BOIP publishes English and French translations
Onel vs Omel: Not Normal - The BOIP's Decision in English Translation
Spain – About Trade Mark Law, the Guggenheim museum and “tapas” (not kidding).
Your comments are welcome!
Onel vs Omel: not Normal?
Greece - 512.000 packs of counterfeit cigarettes seized at the Piraeus Customs
Most embarrassing cease and desist letter ever?
Audi wins 'Vorsprung durch Technik’ appeal
Russia: Cybersquatters, beware! Courts may not be stopping at the statutory compensation limit anymore
Mail.ru can be protected forever!
Medion wins this round in "life" dispute with Nokia
CHESHIRE CAT a geographic indication?
You can't dilute Vodka with Vodkat
Finland: UNION reincarnated
Polish court rules on trade mark use
Does the ICC Code on Advertising and Marketing lack a sense of humour?
Greece - The industry organizes seminar on counterfeiting in Thessaloniki
BGH rules in the Opel/Autec toy car case
Czechs keep cheese GI, to disappointment of Slovakia
OHIM contribution to Commission study on European trade mark system now available
Switzerland: registration in bad faith no argument in opposition proceedings
Ouzaki's not ouzo -- and it's not Greek either
The Polish TIFFANY's trade marks saga continues
Cheese and nuts get PDO protection
Serbia gets a new trade mark law
Trade marks of Russian beer can now be used by a Kazakh brewery
Protecting trade marks against company names: the first 75 UK decisions
Poland: first judgment on differences between sponsorship and advertising of pharmaceutical product
Latest Trademark World
+ 2009
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors