Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  MONDAY, 20 JULY 2009
Frankfurt court enforces "impressum" measures against ISPs

Class 46 is indebted to Andreas Lubberger (Lubberger Lehment, Berlin) for providing information concerning an action brought by Coty Prestige Lancaster Group GmbH against kijiji.de internet sale site owners Marktplaats BV and Kijiji GmbH before the Frankfurt District Court. This decision addresses the liability of internet service providers in respect of both "precautionary" and "follow up" measures which ISPs might possibly have to observe for compliance with so-called "impressum" obligations (Andreas explains: the "impressum" is a short term which is used in Germany to indicate the set of information which is to be provided by every commercial offerer of goods for sale on the internet under Article 6 of the E-Commerce Directive). The first part of Article 6 of that Directive states, in relevant part:

"Information to be provided

In addition to other information requirements established by Community law, Member States shall ensure that commercial communications which are part of, or constitute, an information society service comply at least with the following conditions:

... (b) the natural or legal person on whose behalf the commercial communication is made shall be clearly identifiable; ".
Adds Andreas,
"We consider the illegal "pseudonymity" of professional dealers a major incentive for trade mark infringers to chose eBay as their preferred sales channel and thus aim to enforce this obligation on behalf of Coty and others".
You can read the full text of this decision here. Class 46 understands that (i) Kijiji has filed a writ for an appeal but has not yet substantiated its reasons and that (ii) the Court of Appeal in Frankfurt (the Higher Regional Court) has already indicated in an previous case that it shares the approach of the District Court, which suggests that it is highly unlikely that the appeal will succeed.

Posted by: Jeremy Phillips @ 10.45 
Tags: duty to provide details of sellers, Germany, online sales,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3308 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
- 2009
     + December (44)
     + November (55)
     + October (49)
     + September (48)
     + August (39)
     - July (54)
OHIM lays down instructions for Board of Appeal proceedings
Poland: proving the fame of a trade mark
Spain - Unregistered artistic names: how to protect them?
Poland: bottle shapes and trade mark distinctiveness
Wine growers, take note: new Regulation for designations
Spain - the war against piracy rages on: 2008 statistics
Poland: registration of sound trade marks again!
Botox war update: Allergan chalks up another two victories
Nocciola Romana gets PDO status
Poland: depreciation for registered trade marks only
Poland: are the shoemaker's children always ill-shod?
Cyprus: Trade mark statistics
Czech Republic gets another protected beer appellation
EVIOL confusingly similar to EVION says OHIM
Swiss take Feta hostage
Poland: traditional sound trade mark?
Denmark: Scope of protection of Hermés’ Birkin bag trade marks
Can cognitive science justify dilution claims?
Pirate's Booty: is the time ripe for invasion?
First man on the moon was a footballer - and he's trade marked
Google France opinion: ECJ announces revised date
Poland: against asking?
Swissness gaffe: that's not a Swiss cow!
BGH: no trade mark protection for the Lego toy bricks
Frankfurt court enforces "impressum" measures against ISPs
MARQUES and other organisations take united position on the Cooperation Fund
National emblem rules apply to service mark applications too, rules ECJ
Commission action against Der Grüne Punkt reaffirmed by ECJ
Fraudulent use of "Swissness"?
Red Bull vs Osborn Toro
Alaska is not descriptive for mineral water, says CFI
July-August issue of ETMR now available
Spain –When it comes to IP information, Spanish SMEs will have it easier.
Unfortunate product name
New Swiss practice puts trademarks at serious risk
Uk IPO: New trade mark fees and services from 1 October 2009
Spain – The domain name “seguridadsocial.es” finds its (secure) way home.
Finland: Trade Mark Database Update
Joining co-respondents in name-change proceedings
Fröhlinger review: MARQUES and other organisations send joint letter
Spain - Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith.
Settlement in Knut case
CFI eats Mars' chocolate bar trademark
Disputed balsamic vinegar among latest GI names to secure protection
Greek courts raise the bar for "average consumer"?
Trade mark licences and OHIM practice
Bavaria beer ruling
Poland: trade mark issues on a geographical name of gmina
New UK service for advertising code-compliant ads
Spain - The Supreme Court says “NO” to the international exhaustion of trade mark rights (again).
CENTER SHOCK confusingly similar with CENTER for chocolate and confectionary says CFI
OHIM's Annual Accounts
CFI says No to Dr. No
     + June (54)
     + May (55)
     + April (54)
     + March (57)
     + February (48)
     + January (61)
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors