Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 3 JUNE 2009
Spain - When it comes to prosecute cybersquatting, better rely on trade marks.

On a recently published decision (Cassational appeal no. 1561/2003), the Spanish Supreme Court has declared that the registration of a national (Spanish) domain name (.es) that imitates a registered trade mark cannot be cancelled on the grounds of the Unfair Competition Law, but can only be cancelled and removed from registry if the Court case is construed as a trade mark infringement.


Following the general principle of Civil Law “Lex specialis derogat legi generali”, the Court considered that in cases in which claimant owns registered trade marks that are identical/similar to the domain name registered by respondent, the respondent’s behaviour of registering a identical/similar national (.es) domain name is not punishable under the Spanish Unfair Competition Act, that in section 5 forbids conducts qualifying as acts of bad faith in trade”.

According to section 34.3.3 of the Spanish Trade Mark Act, the registration of a trade mark shall confer on its owner the exclusive right to use it in economic transactions, in particular, using the sign on telematic communication networks and as a domain name.

The registration and use as a domain name in Spain of a sign belonging to a third party will only be punishable under the Spanish Unfair Competition Act in those cases in which claimant does not have a specific trade mark coverage.

Posted by: Ignacio Marques @ 11.13 
Tags: cybersquatting, Domain name disputes., Spain,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3275 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
519 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
- 2009
     + December (44)
     + November (55)
     + October (49)
     + September (48)
     + August (39)
     + July (54)
     - June (54)
A stroll down airline logo lane
Poland: The Bears that went to court
Coty 'perfume tester' reference: the big question
Plan to visit Switzerland? Better leave your fake Rolex at home
Finland: Centralization of IPR litigation
Poland: another case on non-use of a trade mark
Reader survey on the redesign of Alicante News
The function of a trade mark: first Laddie lecture
Imagination loses "acquired distinctiveness" appeal
France: L'Oréal and eBay will meet again, for mediation and before the court of appeal
Don't mess with Ferrari
Greek court refers PDO questions to ECJ
Public consultation for a new Domain Name Regulation in Greece
Louis Vuitton drops claim against seller of fake handbag
Trade marks, social responsibility and fair trade
A hesitant rejection of a domain name complaint by WIPO
It pays to be a (trade mark) bully
Poland: differences between business reputation and trade mark
Swiss IPO to increase filing fee by 57% beginning of 2010
Top ten trade mark representatives in Switzerland
The CSC list: is there a European Union equivalent?
Alicante News No 6/09 - Focus on Greece
Trade mark fee reduction for Hungary
France: INPI annual report for 2008
Nutritional supplements: is Class 5 their natural home?
Geographical indications: the WIPO Symposium
Latest European GI news
British Brands Group wants your views
ECJ judgment in L'Oréal/Bellure
"JUST SKIN" rejected as descriptive and lacking distinctiveness for cosmetics
Poland: frascinating frappe facts
PharmaResearch appeal fails
No confusion about soups, says Swiss court
Latest European appellations now registered
Madrid fees for applications designating the EU
Spanish Trade Mark Office dennounces (very) fake demand letters.
Last-minute win for Lastminute.com
Finland: Case update
ECJ rules on 'bad faith' factors in chocolate bunnie dispute
No hole in the Hedge: earlier mark sees off rival
Spanish cheese heads for protection, but are the defining terms too vague?
Shapes that made it, and those that didn't
Trade Mark Treat of the day: DONALD DUCK
Spain: on trade marks, geographical indications and wine (again!).
Court of First Instance rules on material date for the examination of an absolute ground for invalidity
Some data on 3-dimensional trademarks in Switzerland
Amendments to OHIM's Manual of Trade Mark Practice
Lessons from brand history – evolution of the Kellogg’s corn flakes packet
Finland: Cake Fight Cease Fire?
Spain - When it comes to prosecute cybersquatting, better rely on trade marks.
Calvi isn't Yukon, says Swiss Supreme Court
Milk battles before the CFI
Estonian courts can invalidate opponent's mark even in the absence of a request
DER ROTE BARON not use of RED BARON mark
     + May (55)
     + April (54)
     + March (57)
     + February (48)
     + January (61)
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors