Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  FRIDAY, 27 FEBRUARY 2009
OrientExpress in Poland


R-176922
On 1 August 2002 Polish company HPM from Koszalin applied to register the word-figurative trade mark HPM ORIENTEXPRESS in class 43 for services such as catering and food services, The Polish Patent Office registered this trade mark (R-176922) in its decsions of 19 July 2006.

Societe Nationale Chemins de Fer Francais (SNCF) filed a request to invalidate the right of protection based on article 132(2)(ii) and (iii) of the Polish Act of 30 June 2000 on Industrial Property Law (ustawa Prawo wlasnosci przemyslowej z dnia 30 czerwca 2000 r.) published in Dziennik Ustaw 2001 No 49, pos. 508, consolidated text on 13 June 2003, Dziennik Ustaw No 119, pos. 1117, with later changes:
2. A right of protection for a trade mark shall not be granted, if the trademark:
(ii) is identical or similar to a trade mark for which a right of protection was granted or which has been applied for protection with an earlier priority date (provided that the latter is subsequently granted a right of protection) on behalf of another party for identical or similar goods, if a risk of misleading the public exists, in particular by evoking associations with the earlier mark,
(iii) is identical or similar to a renown trade mark registered or applied for registration with an earlier priority (provided that the latter is subsequently registered) on behalf of another party for any kind of goods, if it without due cause would bring unfair advantage to the applicant or be detrimental to the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark. The above provision shall apply to well-known trade marks accordingly.

CTM no. 000115881
SNCF has claimed that the sign ORIENT-EXPRESS is well-known, reputable and clearly associates with the legendary railway line Paris-Istanbul. SNCF is also the owner of CTMs registered in class 16, 35 and 42: ORIENT-EXPRESS, VENICE SIMPLON ORIENT~EXPRESS (CTM no 000115881). On September 2008, SNCF has opposed CTM registration ORIENT EXPRESS CHINA FUND (CTM no. 1006759278).

On 14 January 2009, The PPO postponed the hearing in this case (act signature Sp. 26/08) and ordered both parties to supplement their statements and evidences.

Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 12.30 
Tags: Famous marks, international trade marks, Poland, Polish Patent Office,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3308 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
- 2009
     + December (44)
     + November (55)
     + October (49)
     + September (48)
     + August (39)
     + July (54)
     + June (54)
     + May (55)
     + April (54)
     + March (57)
     - February (48)
OrientExpress in Poland
Muga: Spanish Supreme Court clarifies scope of unfair competition law
Finland: The New Face of Milk
Polish PUSHKIN's problems
Another PDO is amended
UK IPO: New PAN 01/09 on "Shopping Centre Services"
Poland: 10, 50, 102, 302 and counting...
French trade marks database opens publicly on 3 April 2009
Business Superbrands -- Google scoops the latest poll
Latest issue of the European Trade Mark Reports
Sponsored links: questions refered to the ECJ by the Dutch supreme court
Latest MARQUES Community design review available
New weblog for the fashion sector
More GI applications
Spain – The most valuable Spanish brands, by the consulting firm Brand Finance Iberia.
The wurst decision? Federal Patent Court decides on 'Münchner Weißwurst'
More applications for GI protection
Macedonia: new IP law
Spain – Government to create fifteen new Commercial Courts.
Domain names conference
Thou shall not infringe trade marks
Help from the OHIM: CTM E-Filing: Program compatibility issues
Finland: Statistics for 2008
MILKA fends off ILKA FITT in Hungary
Life Science marks held confusingly similar
Some more questions on L'Oréal v Bellure
Denmark: Burberry counterfeit purses – Supreme Court’s decision concerning damages/compensation
AG's Opinion in L’Oréal v Bellure
Race for Dakar
Geographical indications: cheese and wine
Sponsored links: French first instance court condemns Google
OHIM: Changes to "The Manual of Trade Mark Practice"
Unauthorized Commercials
Erroneous reasoning in composite trade mark cases – instructions from the supreme courts of Greece
Spain - Exhaustion of trade mark rights and selective distribution.
Trade marks in virtual worlds
Finland: European Criteria
Poland: Glazide differs from gliclazidium
WE or ELLE?
the Aceites appeal and the excessively negligent consumer
New CTM e-filing system "faster and simpler"
All change for Gorgonzola -- but what's the change?
More GIs protected in Europe
EU- China action plan to combat IPR infringement
MARQUES gains observer status
Offensive comparative advertising in Greece – on frogs and goats!
L'Oréal v Bellure -- a drink and a discussion?
Latest issue of IP Insight with a feature on "IP in the downturn"
     + January (61)
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors