Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  TUESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2009
Race for Dakar

On 7 November 2002, the Polish company DAKAR from Krasne by/Rzeszów applied for word trade mark registration for DAKAR in class 3 for goods such as preparations for cleaning and maintenance of upholstery and body of a car, cosmetics for cars, in class 27 for goods such as car rugs and also in class 37 for services such as maintenance, repair, overhaul, cleaning, and car tuning. The Polish Patent Office registered this sign (R-174205) in its decision of 6 June 2006. French company (société par action simplifiée) PARIS-DAKAR filed a request for invalidation of the right of protection based on article 132(2)(iii) of the Polish Act of 30 June 2000 on Industrial Property Law (ustawa Prawo wlasnosci przemyslowej z dnia 30 czerwca 2000 r.) published in Dziennik Ustaw 2001 No 49, pos. 508, consolidated text on 13 June 2003, Dziennik Ustaw No 119, pos. 1117, with later changes:

2. A right of protection for a trade mark shall not be granted, if the trade mark:
(iii) is identical or similar to a renown trademark registered or applied for registration with an earlier priority (provided that the latter is subsequently registered) on behalf of another party for any kind of goods, if it without due cause would bring unfair advantage to the applicant or be detrimental to the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trademark. The above provision shall apply to well-known trade marks accordingly.
The French company claimed that the PARIS-DAKAR and DAKAR brands are widely known beacause of the world-wide popular rally which has around thirty years of tradition. In PARIS-DAKAR opinion the Polish company applied for trade mark protection knowingly. It works in the cars trade which may causing a risk of association between the registered mark and the French company's brand and it has been done in order to use its popularity and reputation.

The Polish company argued that, when it applied for trade mark registration, the indication Paris-Dakar was usually associated with the rally, not "Dakar" itself. In addition, there are other trade mark registrations consisting of Dakar word, which means that such sign may function.

On 9 December 2008, the Polish Patent Office postponed the hearing in this case (act signature Sp. 10/08) and ordered the French company to supplement its evidence.

Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 14.23 
Tags: Famous marks, Polish Patent Office, Polish trade marks,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3256 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
- 2009
     + December (44)
     + November (55)
     + October (49)
     + September (48)
     + August (39)
     + July (54)
     + June (54)
     + May (55)
     + April (54)
     + March (57)
     - February (48)
OrientExpress in Poland
Muga: Spanish Supreme Court clarifies scope of unfair competition law
Finland: The New Face of Milk
Polish PUSHKIN's problems
Another PDO is amended
UK IPO: New PAN 01/09 on "Shopping Centre Services"
Poland: 10, 50, 102, 302 and counting...
French trade marks database opens publicly on 3 April 2009
Business Superbrands -- Google scoops the latest poll
Latest issue of the European Trade Mark Reports
Sponsored links: questions refered to the ECJ by the Dutch supreme court
Latest MARQUES Community design review available
New weblog for the fashion sector
More GI applications
Spain – The most valuable Spanish brands, by the consulting firm Brand Finance Iberia.
The wurst decision? Federal Patent Court decides on 'Münchner Weißwurst'
More applications for GI protection
Macedonia: new IP law
Spain – Government to create fifteen new Commercial Courts.
Domain names conference
Thou shall not infringe trade marks
Help from the OHIM: CTM E-Filing: Program compatibility issues
Finland: Statistics for 2008
MILKA fends off ILKA FITT in Hungary
Life Science marks held confusingly similar
Some more questions on L'Oréal v Bellure
Denmark: Burberry counterfeit purses – Supreme Court’s decision concerning damages/compensation
AG's Opinion in L’Oréal v Bellure
Race for Dakar
Geographical indications: cheese and wine
Sponsored links: French first instance court condemns Google
OHIM: Changes to "The Manual of Trade Mark Practice"
Unauthorized Commercials
Erroneous reasoning in composite trade mark cases – instructions from the supreme courts of Greece
Spain - Exhaustion of trade mark rights and selective distribution.
Trade marks in virtual worlds
Finland: European Criteria
Poland: Glazide differs from gliclazidium
WE or ELLE?
the Aceites appeal and the excessively negligent consumer
New CTM e-filing system "faster and simpler"
All change for Gorgonzola -- but what's the change?
More GIs protected in Europe
EU- China action plan to combat IPR infringement
MARQUES gains observer status
Offensive comparative advertising in Greece – on frogs and goats!
L'Oréal v Bellure -- a drink and a discussion?
Latest issue of IP Insight with a feature on "IP in the downturn"
     + January (61)
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors