MARQUES - Association of European Trade Mark Owners

Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search

About Us

Press

Conferences

Members

Teams

Publications

Class 46

Position Papers

FAQs

Links

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news

Now in its sixth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.


	WEDNESDAY, 28 JANUARY 2009 Quiz: German fashion brands The "Fashion Week Berlin" is starting today and to celebrate this glittering event German paper Die Welt has published a glamorous quiz with question about German fashion brands. Before you think German fashion can only be boring, Jil Sander, Joop! and Hugo Boss are only some of the brands covered. The entertaining quiz can be retrieved by clicking here (in German). More current information about German fashion can be found here (in English). Posted by: Birgit Clark @ 12.20 Tags: Fashion brand, Germany, quiz,

0 comments: Post a comment

Who we all are...

Fidel Porcuna

Kathrin Vowinckel

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed

515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader

The Class 46 archive

+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
- 2009
     + December (44)
     + November (55)
     + October (49)
     + September (48)
     + August (39)
     + July (54)
     + June (54)
     + May (55)
     + April (54)
     + March (57)
     + February (48)
     - January (61)

German Federal Patent Court: "Die Drachenjäger"

ALDO S and ALDI are not similar

Bilateral treaty protects the name Retsina

Recent publication: la Revue des Marques

Forthcoming ECJ Opinion

Spain - "Mc" is not only for McDonald's.

Quiz: German fashion brands

Denmark: Supreme Court finds no LoC between MINIMAX and MINIMAL

France: decline in national trade marks filings for 2008

Germany: Valuation of brands

OHIM: official launch of new CTM e-filing on 2 February 2009

Prana Haus heads for ECJ ruling

Latest edition of "Alicante News": new e-filing system on its way

Textile name directive now recast

Car brands quiz

Values

Recent publications

BGH decides in "AdWord" cases

Denmark: Scope of protection of the trade mark TIVOLI

Recent CFI rulings

OHIM payments and bank charges -- again

L'Oréal v Bellure: date for AG's Opinion fixed

When OPTIMUM is sub-optimal

OHIM payments and bank charges

Bad news for Lithuanian cheese names

Germany: BGH "AdWord" decision coming soon

Logos

Spain – Delimiting the border between Trade Mark and Unfair Competition Laws.

Trade marks and the downturn seminar

Crazy Days

Poland: long way to confusion

3 million .eu domain names

Free-of-charge gifts and "genuine use": the ECJ speaks

7th annual CTM course coming soon

The company formerly known as Coke Cola Limited ...

Greece: Indirect rejection of the post-sale confusion doctrine?

Poland: angry about ads

Trade Mark application fuelling speculation on possible transfer of Cristiano Ronaldo

Successful East German brands

Poland: advertising of alcohol products

Germany: DPMA practice amendment in cases of insolvency proceedings against party in proceedings before the DPMA

Brands in Portugal: where 'old' is new

Italian court recognises "post sale confusion"

Poland: rock for all

Polish Pickenpack's problems

Poland: LA ESPANOLA

Establishment of a Factory

Agricultural Product Quality: MARQUES speaks out

OHIM User Satisfaction Survey coming up

Poland: is Hansa history?

Poland: protection of traditional nourishment

When 'Roma' can be deceptive

Austrian Patent Office: 'amended product range' for serv.ip

Poland: confusion around ARENDA

Poland: product's information in Polish

Poland: inspiration or plagiarism?

Spain – Selling wine under a fake Geographical Indication is an IP offence, but also a prosecutable fraud.

Marks consisting of initials

Will prosecco follow where Champagne led the way?

Recent publications

Two recent ECJ decisions

+ 2008
+ 2007

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]