Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  SUNDAY, 18 JANUARY 2009
Spain – Delimiting the border between Trade Mark and Unfair Competition Laws.

In a recently published Judgment, the Spanish Supreme Court has taken the chance to make the Spanish IP community remember that the Unfair Competition Law should not be invoked in “pure” trade mark disputes. Such disputes have to be exclusively decided on the basis of the parameters set forth in the Trade Mark Law.

In that specific case, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the actual trade mark infringement, and then attempted to readdress the case by arguing -as an ancillary motion and on the basis of same facts- that the defendant committed “acts of confusion” (such category of behaviors in trade is expressly forbidden under the Spanish Unfair Competition Act).

The Spanish Supreme Court took the chance to establish that it is not admissible to appeal to the Unfair Competition Law to decide a trade mark conflict. Unfair Competition legislation is (the Court says) not a “substitute” of Trade Mark Law, but its complement.

For those aiming to learn more of the case, the full text of the Judgment (in Spanish) can be found here.

Posted by: Ignacio Marques @ 15.13 
Tags: Spain, unfair competition.,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3277 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
- 2009
     + December (44)
     + November (55)
     + October (49)
     + September (48)
     + August (39)
     + July (54)
     + June (54)
     + May (55)
     + April (54)
     + March (57)
     + February (48)
     - January (61)
German Federal Patent Court: "Die Drachenjäger"
ALDO S and ALDI are not similar
Bilateral treaty protects the name Retsina
Recent publication: la Revue des Marques
Forthcoming ECJ Opinion
Spain - "Mc" is not only for McDonald's.
Quiz: German fashion brands
Denmark: Supreme Court finds no LoC between MINIMAX and MINIMAL
France: decline in national trade marks filings for 2008
Germany: Valuation of brands
OHIM: official launch of new CTM e-filing on 2 February 2009
Prana Haus heads for ECJ ruling
Latest edition of "Alicante News": new e-filing system on its way
Textile name directive now recast
Car brands quiz
Values
Recent publications
BGH decides in "AdWord" cases
Denmark: Scope of protection of the trade mark TIVOLI
Recent CFI rulings
OHIM payments and bank charges -- again
L'Oréal v Bellure: date for AG's Opinion fixed
When OPTIMUM is sub-optimal
OHIM payments and bank charges
Bad news for Lithuanian cheese names
Germany: BGH "AdWord" decision coming soon
Logos
Spain – Delimiting the border between Trade Mark and Unfair Competition Laws.
Trade marks and the downturn seminar
Crazy Days
Poland: long way to confusion
3 million .eu domain names
Free-of-charge gifts and "genuine use": the ECJ speaks
7th annual CTM course coming soon
The company formerly known as Coke Cola Limited ...
Greece: Indirect rejection of the post-sale confusion doctrine?
Poland: angry about ads
Trade Mark application fuelling speculation on possible transfer of Cristiano Ronaldo
Successful East German brands
Poland: advertising of alcohol products
Germany: DPMA practice amendment in cases of insolvency proceedings against party in proceedings before the DPMA
Brands in Portugal: where 'old' is new
Italian court recognises "post sale confusion"
Poland: rock for all
Polish Pickenpack's problems
Poland: LA ESPANOLA
Establishment of a Factory
Agricultural Product Quality: MARQUES speaks out
OHIM User Satisfaction Survey coming up
Poland: is Hansa history?
Poland: protection of traditional nourishment
When 'Roma' can be deceptive
Austrian Patent Office: 'amended product range' for serv.ip
Poland: confusion around ARENDA
Poland: product's information in Polish
Poland: inspiration or plagiarism?
Spain – Selling wine under a fake Geographical Indication is an IP offence, but also a prosecutable fraud.
Marks consisting of initials
Will prosecco follow where Champagne led the way?
Recent publications
Two recent ECJ decisions
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors