Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 14 JANUARY 2009
Poland: angry about ads

The Polish newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza recently published an article regarding the number of complaints lodged before the Union of Associations Advertising Council (Zwiazek Stowarzyszen Rada Reklamy) against advertising. The Union is an organisation responsible for advertising self-regulation in the Republic of Poland. The industry standards in marketing communication are defined in the Code of Ethics. This Code contains specific provisions prohibiting, among others discrimination based on sex, religion or nationality, to encourage the use of violence or prohibiting to abuse the trust of the recipient, his lack of experience or knowledge.

The Commission of Ethics in Advertising (KER) is the main body responsible for adjudicating breaches of the Code and rules of advertising. KER is comprised of 30 arbiters nominated by advertisers, media and agencies, these being independent experts in the field of advertising and marketing communication. The simplified system of self-regulation protects consumers against unethical advertising or unfair advertising. Anyone who thinks that an advertising message violates standards set by the KER may lodge a complaint.

According to Gazeta Wyborcza the most controversial ad in 2008 was "Virginity", prepared by the advertising agency "Koledzy" for the clothing company Artman (now owned by the LPP). The campaign promoted a collection of clothes for young people aged 19-25 years, branded as "Virginity". Billboards and posters depicted a young man praying with a rosary in his hand. The words in the background proclaimed: "I know 69 ways to preserve virginity. And you?". Other version of the ad depicted a young girl with a sentence "Guard me, Father" or with "There are 69 ways to preserve virginity" sentence. Konrad Drozdowski who is representing the Union of Associations Advertising Council has told the press that this ad received a total number of 283 complaints.

Second place in the number of complaints filed took the ad titled "Masculinity". It was prepared for Mobilking virtual mobile operator. In an advertising movie that was aired on TV and on the Internet, a scantily dressed woman trying to cut a tree, to shoot with a firearm or trying to repair a car. This campaign, received 37 complaints. Nine complaints concerned advertising of the movie called "Frontiers".



The biggest number of complaints alleged that advertising discriminated on grounds of religious belief (287 complaints), gender (53 complaints), was misleading (32 complaints), and used violence and shock tactics (31 complaints). The Council considered 158 cases as valid in whole or in part. 42 complaints were rejected, and 67 complaints were written in a such way that the judges were not able to determine which ads were referred to.

Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 13.05 
Tags: Advertising, advertising standards, Poland,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3275 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
- 2009
     + December (44)
     + November (55)
     + October (49)
     + September (48)
     + August (39)
     + July (54)
     + June (54)
     + May (55)
     + April (54)
     + March (57)
     + February (48)
     - January (61)
German Federal Patent Court: "Die Drachenjäger"
ALDO S and ALDI are not similar
Bilateral treaty protects the name Retsina
Recent publication: la Revue des Marques
Forthcoming ECJ Opinion
Spain - "Mc" is not only for McDonald's.
Quiz: German fashion brands
Denmark: Supreme Court finds no LoC between MINIMAX and MINIMAL
France: decline in national trade marks filings for 2008
Germany: Valuation of brands
OHIM: official launch of new CTM e-filing on 2 February 2009
Prana Haus heads for ECJ ruling
Latest edition of "Alicante News": new e-filing system on its way
Textile name directive now recast
Car brands quiz
Values
Recent publications
BGH decides in "AdWord" cases
Denmark: Scope of protection of the trade mark TIVOLI
Recent CFI rulings
OHIM payments and bank charges -- again
L'Oréal v Bellure: date for AG's Opinion fixed
When OPTIMUM is sub-optimal
OHIM payments and bank charges
Bad news for Lithuanian cheese names
Germany: BGH "AdWord" decision coming soon
Logos
Spain – Delimiting the border between Trade Mark and Unfair Competition Laws.
Trade marks and the downturn seminar
Crazy Days
Poland: long way to confusion
3 million .eu domain names
Free-of-charge gifts and "genuine use": the ECJ speaks
7th annual CTM course coming soon
The company formerly known as Coke Cola Limited ...
Greece: Indirect rejection of the post-sale confusion doctrine?
Poland: angry about ads
Trade Mark application fuelling speculation on possible transfer of Cristiano Ronaldo
Successful East German brands
Poland: advertising of alcohol products
Germany: DPMA practice amendment in cases of insolvency proceedings against party in proceedings before the DPMA
Brands in Portugal: where 'old' is new
Italian court recognises "post sale confusion"
Poland: rock for all
Polish Pickenpack's problems
Poland: LA ESPANOLA
Establishment of a Factory
Agricultural Product Quality: MARQUES speaks out
OHIM User Satisfaction Survey coming up
Poland: is Hansa history?
Poland: protection of traditional nourishment
When 'Roma' can be deceptive
Austrian Patent Office: 'amended product range' for serv.ip
Poland: confusion around ARENDA
Poland: product's information in Polish
Poland: inspiration or plagiarism?
Spain – Selling wine under a fake Geographical Indication is an IP offence, but also a prosecutable fraud.
Marks consisting of initials
Will prosecco follow where Champagne led the way?
Recent publications
Two recent ECJ decisions
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors