Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  FRIDAY, 2 JANUARY 2009
Spain – Selling wine under a fake Geographical Indication is an IP offence, but also a prosecutable fraud.

The Spanish Supreme Court (Criminal Chamber) has recently handed down an interesting judgment that declares that the sale of wine under a deceptive Geographical Indication (“GI”) constitutes not only an IP offence, but also a prosecutable fraud (“estafa”), which is a different crime under the Spanish Criminal Code.

The concurrence of the two criminal charges over the same conduct significantly increases the punishment for the impeached individuals, and enhances the legal (criminal) protection over GIs in Spain.

According to the reported judgment, some individuals sold almost 1,000,000 bottles of wine branded with a label that read “Denominacion de Origen de la Rioja”, when the wine originated in an area outside the geographical scope of the GI. Such bottles were imported and sold in the UK through a network of wholesalers.

The accused individuals not only counterfeited the labels attached to the bottles, but also the Certificates by the “Consejo Regulador de la Denominacion de Origen La Rioja” (La Rioja GI Council) that are required to legally ship the wine to Great Britain.

The impeached individuals have been sentenced to 4 years and 6 months of prison, to pay damages in the amount of 100,000.- Euros and to bear the Court costs and the attorney’s fees from the winning party.

The full text of the Judgment (in Spanish) is available here.

Posted by: Ignacio Marques @ 19.57 
Tags: criminal law., geographic indication, Spain,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3278 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
519 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
- 2009
     + December (44)
     + November (55)
     + October (49)
     + September (48)
     + August (39)
     + July (54)
     + June (54)
     + May (55)
     + April (54)
     + March (57)
     + February (48)
     - January (61)
German Federal Patent Court: "Die Drachenjäger"
ALDO S and ALDI are not similar
Bilateral treaty protects the name Retsina
Recent publication: la Revue des Marques
Forthcoming ECJ Opinion
Spain - "Mc" is not only for McDonald's.
Quiz: German fashion brands
Denmark: Supreme Court finds no LoC between MINIMAX and MINIMAL
France: decline in national trade marks filings for 2008
Germany: Valuation of brands
OHIM: official launch of new CTM e-filing on 2 February 2009
Prana Haus heads for ECJ ruling
Latest edition of "Alicante News": new e-filing system on its way
Textile name directive now recast
Car brands quiz
Values
Recent publications
BGH decides in "AdWord" cases
Denmark: Scope of protection of the trade mark TIVOLI
Recent CFI rulings
OHIM payments and bank charges -- again
L'Oréal v Bellure: date for AG's Opinion fixed
When OPTIMUM is sub-optimal
OHIM payments and bank charges
Bad news for Lithuanian cheese names
Germany: BGH "AdWord" decision coming soon
Logos
Spain – Delimiting the border between Trade Mark and Unfair Competition Laws.
Trade marks and the downturn seminar
Crazy Days
Poland: long way to confusion
3 million .eu domain names
Free-of-charge gifts and "genuine use": the ECJ speaks
7th annual CTM course coming soon
The company formerly known as Coke Cola Limited ...
Greece: Indirect rejection of the post-sale confusion doctrine?
Poland: angry about ads
Trade Mark application fuelling speculation on possible transfer of Cristiano Ronaldo
Successful East German brands
Poland: advertising of alcohol products
Germany: DPMA practice amendment in cases of insolvency proceedings against party in proceedings before the DPMA
Brands in Portugal: where 'old' is new
Italian court recognises "post sale confusion"
Poland: rock for all
Polish Pickenpack's problems
Poland: LA ESPANOLA
Establishment of a Factory
Agricultural Product Quality: MARQUES speaks out
OHIM User Satisfaction Survey coming up
Poland: is Hansa history?
Poland: protection of traditional nourishment
When 'Roma' can be deceptive
Austrian Patent Office: 'amended product range' for serv.ip
Poland: confusion around ARENDA
Poland: product's information in Polish
Poland: inspiration or plagiarism?
Spain – Selling wine under a fake Geographical Indication is an IP offence, but also a prosecutable fraud.
Marks consisting of initials
Will prosecco follow where Champagne led the way?
Recent publications
Two recent ECJ decisions
+ 2008
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors