Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 24 DECEMBER 2008
Conviction in Danish ‘Winnie the Pooh’ case

Last week a 66-year old Danish businessman was convicted by the District Court for the illegal importation and sale of Chinese-produced soft toy copies. According to information provided by Hanne Weywardt (a partner in the Copenhagen office of the MAQS law firm), the somewhat curious Winnie the Pooh case has been on its way for more than four years and was brought by major companies such as Disney, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, BBC and the Danish railways, DSB. The number of soft toy figures amounted to over 139,000, representing an estimated value in the double-digit million range. Hanne reports:

"It was argued that import and sale of the soft toys constituted an infringement of the copyrights in famous television and cartoon figures such as the Teletubbies, Spiderman and Winnie the Pooh and of their corresponding trade marks. The defendant admitted the importation and sale, but claimed that there was no infringement as the allegedly infringing toys had only a low degree of similarity to the original figures. The decisive point was therefore for the judge to determine which features defined the copyright-protected figures and which could only be considered as common features for all soft toys.

Though some of soft toys were of such low quality and resemblance that they could not be considered an infringement under the law, the court generally ruled in favour of the plaintiffs. Due to the scale of the importation and sale, the defendant was sentenced to 10 months probationary imprisonment and in addition a fine of approximately € 26,700.

The public prosecutor involved in the case describe the sentence as relatively hard and stressed that he expected this conviction to set a precedent for similar cases".

Posted by: Jeremy Phillips @ 08.31 
Tags: Denmark, trade mark infringement,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3265 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
+ 2009
- 2008
     - December (66)
Belgium: ADR tax to be reimbursed to successful complainants
Latest GI news
What happens to popular words like "focus" ...
RAW: not enough Intel-DNA for G-Star?
Advocate General sees no problem with "Bayerisches Bier" GI
Fee increase
Moldova signs up for Singapore
Cybersquatting can be an expensive exercise (if they find you)
Czech Arbitration Court: pilot programme for new UDRP service
Conviction in Danish ‘Winnie the Pooh’ case
The ineffaceableness of a trade mark
Interbrand study: Italy's 10 Most Valuable Global Brands
UK: Latest issue of IPInsight
Chocolate bearing counterfeit trade mark seized
Bending territoriality for fame: A US perspective
OHIM: December issue of 'Alicante News' now published
Applications for GI status
Poland: cross-border reputation
Poland: sweet are lips and kids
Assigning a mark without the business: a question of deception?
Poland: Sharp v. Sharp
Taxi!
New Danish legislation enforces higher penalties for counterfeiting
Change of address for Class 46
Spain - The Spanish Community Trade Mark Court grants interim relief on the basis of 3-D mark.
OHIM: four offices opt out of the national searches system
Finland: Changes to trade mark fees
Bleu d'Avergne PDO amended
Russia: Confusion over emoticon trade mark application
Ad-acadabra: the Dutch Supreme Court's questions in the Primakabin/Portakabin's case
France: modifications of the IP Code
More GI news
Community Trade Mark fee reduction: 40% or 50% ?
Olympic Casino's trade mark gamble fails
And yellow were the pages...
EU Commission proposes to "halve the costs for an EU trade mark"
Poland: Marqa 2008
Battle of the Strads Revisited
Inpi.com served to the French Trade Mark Office
Austria: "Styriagra" v "Viagra"
Coke Cola gets ultimatum: "change name, or else ..."
ECJ rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference
This is a man's men's body shop
Spain - The Spanish Trade Marks Office receives the "Highly Commended" distinction by the Global Anti Counterfeiting Group.
Recent publications
Poland: reminiscences on LEGO's problems
'V' for Armani in Dutch sunglasses case
Solex: an e-conic French trademark
CFI: BECKER v Barbara Becker
Poseidon vs common sense
OHIM: Changes to "The Manual of Trade Mark Practice"
Hungary gears up for Olympic symbol protection
Croatia makes it simple
Germany: Polar bear Knut and the "big credit freeze"
Poland: special law for Euro 2012 trade marks?
MARQUES members, take note!
Che Guevara's portrait : an icon, not a trade mark
Wow it's sticky: it's MTV's Sticky Brand Award 2008
Germany: Michael "Bully" Herbig v "Bully - die Ehrenrunde" - the Munich Court has decided
Intel v CPM: the rapid response seminar
UK: Tribunal Practice Notice TPN 6/2008
Bundesgerichtshof: Lefax/Lefaxin decision
Poland: reminiscences on "i Intel"
Blue Chocolate
Rapid Response Seminar: new venue
More Community trade mark decisions from the CFI
     + November (60)
     + October (72)
     + September (86)
     + August (48)
     + July (57)
     + June (64)
     + May (68)
     + April (72)
     + March (77)
     + February (100)
     + January (100)
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors