Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 3 DECEMBER 2008
UK: Tribunal Practice Notice TPN 6/2008

On 1 December the IPO (formerly and otherwise also known as the UK IPO) issued a new Tribunal Practice Notice: TPN 6/2008 on "Costs in proceedings before the Comptroller". The new TPN 6/2008 updates and supplements Tribunal Practice Notice TPN 4/2007:

"(... ) 3. As from 3 December 2007, costs are not usually awarded against rights holders or applicants who do not defend an action brought without prior notice. This practice still applies to trade mark revocation and invalidation proceedings and to opposition proceedings where, under the new Trade Marks Rules 2008 ("the rules"), the opponent files an opposition without having previously filed a Notice of Threatened Opposition on Form TM7a, or otherwise given the applicant prior notice of the impending opposition.

4. However, as the Registrar copies Notices of Threatened Opposition to applicants, the UK-IPO accepted, in ‘The Response to the Consultation on the new Trade Mark Rules’, that the act of filing Form TM7a would usually be considered as giving the applicant an opportunity to withdraw the application before any formal opposition was filed. The Form TM7a does not provide the applicant with a summary of the intended grounds of the opposition, but in many cases these will be obvious from the results of the Examiner’s search for earlier marks sent to the applicant prior to the publication of the application. Further, the TM7a does provide the applicant with the opponent’s contact address.

5. Thus, an award of costs from the normal scale will usually be made to an opponent where a) a Form TM7a was filed, b) a subsequent Notice of Opposition is filed, and c) the opposition is undefended. The Registrar will use his discretion to reduce that award, or give no award at all, where the opponent did not allow reasonable time between the filing of Form TM7a, and the subsequent Form TM7, or is shown to have unreasonably refused to answer a request from the applicant to give an indication of the prospective grounds for opposition, despite having been asked to do so.

6. Where an opposition is defended, the provision or otherwise of prior notice will not usually affect the award of costs at the conclusion of the proceedings, which will normally be based on the published scale of costs."

The TPN can be retrieved in its entirety by clicking here (which will take you to the IPO's new website).

Posted by: Birgit Clark @ 00.05 
Tags: ipo, Tribunal Practice Notice, UKIPO; UK trade marks,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3302 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
+ 2009
- 2008
     - December (66)
Belgium: ADR tax to be reimbursed to successful complainants
Latest GI news
What happens to popular words like "focus" ...
RAW: not enough Intel-DNA for G-Star?
Advocate General sees no problem with "Bayerisches Bier" GI
Fee increase
Moldova signs up for Singapore
Cybersquatting can be an expensive exercise (if they find you)
Czech Arbitration Court: pilot programme for new UDRP service
Conviction in Danish ‘Winnie the Pooh’ case
The ineffaceableness of a trade mark
Interbrand study: Italy's 10 Most Valuable Global Brands
UK: Latest issue of IPInsight
Chocolate bearing counterfeit trade mark seized
Bending territoriality for fame: A US perspective
OHIM: December issue of 'Alicante News' now published
Applications for GI status
Poland: cross-border reputation
Poland: sweet are lips and kids
Assigning a mark without the business: a question of deception?
Poland: Sharp v. Sharp
Taxi!
New Danish legislation enforces higher penalties for counterfeiting
Change of address for Class 46
Spain - The Spanish Community Trade Mark Court grants interim relief on the basis of 3-D mark.
OHIM: four offices opt out of the national searches system
Finland: Changes to trade mark fees
Bleu d'Avergne PDO amended
Russia: Confusion over emoticon trade mark application
Ad-acadabra: the Dutch Supreme Court's questions in the Primakabin/Portakabin's case
France: modifications of the IP Code
More GI news
Community Trade Mark fee reduction: 40% or 50% ?
Olympic Casino's trade mark gamble fails
And yellow were the pages...
EU Commission proposes to "halve the costs for an EU trade mark"
Poland: Marqa 2008
Battle of the Strads Revisited
Inpi.com served to the French Trade Mark Office
Austria: "Styriagra" v "Viagra"
Coke Cola gets ultimatum: "change name, or else ..."
ECJ rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference
This is a man's men's body shop
Spain - The Spanish Trade Marks Office receives the "Highly Commended" distinction by the Global Anti Counterfeiting Group.
Recent publications
Poland: reminiscences on LEGO's problems
'V' for Armani in Dutch sunglasses case
Solex: an e-conic French trademark
CFI: BECKER v Barbara Becker
Poseidon vs common sense
OHIM: Changes to "The Manual of Trade Mark Practice"
Hungary gears up for Olympic symbol protection
Croatia makes it simple
Germany: Polar bear Knut and the "big credit freeze"
Poland: special law for Euro 2012 trade marks?
MARQUES members, take note!
Che Guevara's portrait : an icon, not a trade mark
Wow it's sticky: it's MTV's Sticky Brand Award 2008
Germany: Michael "Bully" Herbig v "Bully - die Ehrenrunde" - the Munich Court has decided
Intel v CPM: the rapid response seminar
UK: Tribunal Practice Notice TPN 6/2008
Bundesgerichtshof: Lefax/Lefaxin decision
Poland: reminiscences on "i Intel"
Blue Chocolate
Rapid Response Seminar: new venue
More Community trade mark decisions from the CFI
     + November (60)
     + October (72)
     + September (86)
     + August (48)
     + July (57)
     + June (64)
     + May (68)
     + April (72)
     + March (77)
     + February (100)
     + January (100)
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors