Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  WEDNESDAY, 3 DECEMBER 2008
Germany: Michael "Bully" Herbig v "Bully - die Ehrenrunde" - the Munich Court has decided

The Regional Court Munich I recently decided the trade mark dispute between German comedian and actor Michael "Bully" Herbig and software producer Take Two Interactive regarding the release of a computer game called "Bully - Die Ehrenrunde". Class 46 first reported on this case in August 2008.

By way of background information: the German word "die Ehrenrunde" translates into 'lap of honour' and colloquially also means 'repeating a year in school'. Herbig became famous in Germany in the 1990s with his comedy show "Bullyparade" and is widely known under the stage name "Bully". The computer game features a teenager as its main protagonist, who occasionally has to "get rough" with his surroundings at a boarding school. The case was heard by the Munich Regional Court I (Landgericht München I). In the proceedings Michael "Bully" Herbig, inter alia, argued that the computer game infringed his trade mark rights and his personality rights and that he did not want to be associated with a violent computer game. The defendant stated that the game title did not refer to the actor but was a mere reference to the English colloquial word "to bully".

In its decision of 28 October 2008 the Munich Regional Court dismissed Mr. Herbig's case. The court confirmed that Mr Herbig was well-known in the television and movie sector. The court also acknowledged that Mr Herbig was well-known under his stage name, which was even listed in his passport. As such, Mr Herbig was entitled to a certain degree of protection of that name. However, the court emphasised that the term "Bully" was also often used in a different context. "Bully" was a term used in ice hockey, there was a VW van called "Bully" and the word was used by Germany's "anglicising youth" which understood the term "bully" in the its original English language meaning. In this respect the court decided that the term had to be considered as a descriptive and should be freely available to use. The court went on to say that the term "Bully" had no specific meaning in the area of computer games and, as such, there was no likelihood of confusion between Mr Herbig and the defendant's computer game. The court further established that there was no likelihood of confusion with the Mr Herbig's tv shows because the relevant consumer group for computer games would not simply transfer the term "Bully" - which was not a commonly used term in the field of computer games - from the field of tv and movie entertainment and associate it with Mr Herbig.

Case reference: Landgericht München I, 33 O 24030/07, of 28 October 2008. The court's press release can be retrieved by clicking here (in German). The decision is not yet final.

Posted by: Birgit Clark @ 06.16 
Tags: bully, computer game, German trade marks, trade mark dispute,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3279 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
+ 2009
- 2008
     - December (66)
Belgium: ADR tax to be reimbursed to successful complainants
Latest GI news
What happens to popular words like "focus" ...
RAW: not enough Intel-DNA for G-Star?
Advocate General sees no problem with "Bayerisches Bier" GI
Fee increase
Moldova signs up for Singapore
Cybersquatting can be an expensive exercise (if they find you)
Czech Arbitration Court: pilot programme for new UDRP service
Conviction in Danish ‘Winnie the Pooh’ case
The ineffaceableness of a trade mark
Interbrand study: Italy's 10 Most Valuable Global Brands
UK: Latest issue of IPInsight
Chocolate bearing counterfeit trade mark seized
Bending territoriality for fame: A US perspective
OHIM: December issue of 'Alicante News' now published
Applications for GI status
Poland: cross-border reputation
Poland: sweet are lips and kids
Assigning a mark without the business: a question of deception?
Poland: Sharp v. Sharp
Taxi!
New Danish legislation enforces higher penalties for counterfeiting
Change of address for Class 46
Spain - The Spanish Community Trade Mark Court grants interim relief on the basis of 3-D mark.
OHIM: four offices opt out of the national searches system
Finland: Changes to trade mark fees
Bleu d'Avergne PDO amended
Russia: Confusion over emoticon trade mark application
Ad-acadabra: the Dutch Supreme Court's questions in the Primakabin/Portakabin's case
France: modifications of the IP Code
More GI news
Community Trade Mark fee reduction: 40% or 50% ?
Olympic Casino's trade mark gamble fails
And yellow were the pages...
EU Commission proposes to "halve the costs for an EU trade mark"
Poland: Marqa 2008
Battle of the Strads Revisited
Inpi.com served to the French Trade Mark Office
Austria: "Styriagra" v "Viagra"
Coke Cola gets ultimatum: "change name, or else ..."
ECJ rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference
This is a man's men's body shop
Spain - The Spanish Trade Marks Office receives the "Highly Commended" distinction by the Global Anti Counterfeiting Group.
Recent publications
Poland: reminiscences on LEGO's problems
'V' for Armani in Dutch sunglasses case
Solex: an e-conic French trademark
CFI: BECKER v Barbara Becker
Poseidon vs common sense
OHIM: Changes to "The Manual of Trade Mark Practice"
Hungary gears up for Olympic symbol protection
Croatia makes it simple
Germany: Polar bear Knut and the "big credit freeze"
Poland: special law for Euro 2012 trade marks?
MARQUES members, take note!
Che Guevara's portrait : an icon, not a trade mark
Wow it's sticky: it's MTV's Sticky Brand Award 2008
Germany: Michael "Bully" Herbig v "Bully - die Ehrenrunde" - the Munich Court has decided
Intel v CPM: the rapid response seminar
UK: Tribunal Practice Notice TPN 6/2008
Bundesgerichtshof: Lefax/Lefaxin decision
Poland: reminiscences on "i Intel"
Blue Chocolate
Rapid Response Seminar: new venue
More Community trade mark decisions from the CFI
     + November (60)
     + October (72)
     + September (86)
     + August (48)
     + July (57)
     + June (64)
     + May (68)
     + April (72)
     + March (77)
     + February (100)
     + January (100)
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors