Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  THURSDAY, 13 NOVEMBER 2008
German Federal Supreme Court: Marlene Dietrich Image ("Marlene-Dietrich-Bildnis")

The German Federal Supreme (Bundesgerichtshof) recently decided whether the image of a famous person can be protected as a trade mark. The estate of Marlene Dietrich had filed for a device trade mark at the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA), which consisted of a black and white photograph of the famous actress and covered various goods and services in different classes.

The DPMA and the Federal Patent Court refused the application arguing that the mark was not distinctive enough for registration and the image had to be kept free. The DPMA and the Federal Patent Court both agreed that Marlene Dietrich was still well known to many people today and as such her photograph would merely be perceived as an advertising statement and as descriptive of the goods and services claimed by the application, which inter alia covered CDs, DVDs, merchandising and video tapes. In its decision of 24 August 2008, the Federal Supreme Court at least partly disagreed with this assessment. The court clarified that images of living and deceased persons can, in principle, be registered as trade marks. The judges refused registration of the device mark consisting of Marlene Dietrich's photograph for such goods and services that referred to the life and works of the deceased actress and singer, such as CDs, DVDs and Videos. Insofar as these goods and services were concerned, Marlene Dietrich's image had to be seen as purely descriptive. However, the Federal Supreme Court disagreed with the Federal Patent Court and ruled that the device mark was distinctive enough to qualify for registration in relation to those goods and services that did not bear a direct reference to the diva's life; i.e merchandising articles such as diaries, clothing, hats, belts, shoes, ties and sporting activities. The latter goods and services could be used in such a way that the device mark would be perceived as an indication of trade origin and not purely as advertisement statement.

Case reference: I ZB 21/06 of 24 August 2008. The decision can be retrieved in its entirety via the Court's website at www.bundesgerichtshof.de

Posted by: Birgit Clark @ 00.26 
Tags: Bundesgerichtshof, Bundespatentgericht, German Federal Supreme Court, German trade marks,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3352 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
519 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
+ 2009
- 2008
     + December (66)
     - November (60)
Coming up this week in the European Court of Justice
Spain - The Princess and the Trade Mark Office.
Recent Community trade mark decisions from the CFI
European trade marks in a virtual world
Breaking news: ECJ ruling in Intel v CPM
Poland: TOKAJI as Hungarian GI can not be monopolized as trade mark
Wooden lexical inventions
Poland: trade mark in design
ECOBLUE appeal fails
Poland: and the winners are...
Quantum of product placement
Turkish court confirms status of bad faith as a ground of invalidity
Davidoff's Cool Water Testers and Exhaustion
AFRI-COLA part descriptive, part deceptive, part registrable
Poland: VIAGRA vs VIAGREEN has to wait because of VIA' GREEN
Genuine use and free distribution of goods
Spain – A sparkling Judgment: a Spanish Court enforces the French Geographical Indication “Champagne”.
Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings
Bang & Olufsen 3D trade mark: a substantial value in the shape
Polar bear cub trade marks in Germany: a definitive analysis
German Federal Supreme Court: "afilias.de"
RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion
Alicante News - issue 11/08
Spain – VIAGRA found to be a “well-known” trade mark.
No First Aid for Dutch EHBO in Summary Proceedings
Tasty new PGIs on the register
Upside down mark with a dot is unlikely to cause confusion
20 November -- a busy day?
Poland: principles of merchant's honesty in trade mark cases
OHIM fees: Charlie McCreevy speaks
German Federal Supreme Court: "SIERRA ANTIGUO"
Poland: how to build billboards
Dilution in Europe: Rapid Response Seminar
German Federal Supreme Court: Marlene Dietrich Image ("Marlene-Dietrich-Bildnis")
24-colour Munsell system colour mark refused as CTM
Lego: another brick in the wall
German Federal Supreme Court: 'Pantohexal'
Who Picked My Puck?.. Pardon, Cheese
GI amendment applications
Many European countries represented in the Country Brand Index
Italians seek PDO for PAGNOTTA DEL DITTAINO
89/104 is dead -- long live 2008/95
Adobe loses FLEX appeal
Spain - An old glory is being auctioned.
Do you use the trade mark bits on the UK IPO website?
OHIM: Amendments to the 'Manual of Trade Mark Practice'
Poland: VOGUE partially invalidated
Bosnia-Herzegovina signs up for Madrid Protocol
No restitutio in integrum for Neurim, says CFI
German Federal Supreme Court: Hansen-Bau
Henkel to reduce its trade mark portfolio
Refreshment Guidelines Refusal Trademarks on Absolute Grounds From Benelux Office for Intellectual Property
More time given for revalidation of Serbian IP rights
No grey or black suits for Dutch skaters!
First Bunnies Giving Back
Poland: Lindt's problems with Polish bunnies
More GI news
Ukraine: trade marks database to be accessible free of charge
Shoe motifs' scope of protection
Spain - Goverment to publish a "Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities"
     + October (72)
     + September (86)
     + August (48)
     + July (57)
     + June (64)
     + May (68)
     + April (72)
     + March (77)
     + February (100)
     + January (100)
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors