Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  FRIDAY, 27 JUNE 2008
Switzerland: New Provisions on Counterfeit and Pirated Goods

On 1 July 2008 an interesting new provision aimed at combating counterfeit and pirated goods will enter into force in Switzerland.

Article 13 of the Federal Trade Mark Act (FTA) defines the exclusive rights of the trade mark owner. This provision confers to the trade mark owner inter alia the right to prevent others from using the trade mark and to prohibit others from importing or exporting trade marked goods. However, doctrine and jurisprudence always understood this provision not to limit the private use of goods bearing a trade mark. As a result, it was also deemed lawful to buy branded products abroad and to bring them to Switzerland for private use, regardless of their being counterfeits. The Federal Supreme Court confirmed this principle in a decision concerning the importation of a counterfeit Rolex watch. It reasoned that, once the watch had been purchased by a private person for private use, it was withdrawn from the market and represented no risk to the Swiss public.

These considerations were not shared by the Federal Council. In its view it was not certain that products privately purchased abroad would not find their way to the Swiss market. The Federal Council considered that the demand of individuals for counterfeit and pirated products stimulated the offer of such goods. Other than, for instance, in patent law, in trade mark and design law there were no legitimate interests for the use of illegally produced items. These considerations led to an amendment of Article 13 FTA.

From 1 July 2008 onwards the situation will thus change for private importers. Article 13 FTA will be amended by a new paragraph 2bis, which grants to the trade mark owner the additional right to prohibit the import, export or transit of commercially produced goods under registered trade marks if that import, export or transit occurs for private purpose. The customs authorities may retain goods that they suspect to unlawfully bear a trade mark. With the entering into force of the new regulation it will be easier for trade mark owners to remove illegal products from the market because the customs authorities may directly destroy counterfeit and pirated goods as long as no objection is filed. If the goods are found to bear the trade mark unlawfully, the private importer of the goods will have to accept the destruction without compensation. Even if the new regulation does not entail that consumers will be punished, they risk losing their goods at the border crossings.

Corresponding provisions will enter into force in design law.

The new provisions will have a considerable impact on persons travelling into Switzerland. For consumers it is often impossible to control the origin of the goods, in particular if the goods are purchased in markets, second-hand or small stores selling various brands, or at beaches. In such cases consumers risk that their goods be retained at the border and destroyed if later identified to be counterfeit or pirated goods by the trade mark or design right owner.

Posted by: @ 00.17 
Tags: Switzerland, Counterfeiting,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3256 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
+ 2009
- 2008
     + December (66)
     + November (60)
     + October (72)
     + September (86)
     + August (48)
     + July (57)
     - June (64)
Illegal incentives
France: eBay heavily condemned
Spain – The Spanish Supreme Court rejects the registration of “BANK ON LINE” (plus device) for class 36.
Singapore: yes for Denmark, but not yet for Greenland and Faroes
Erdgas, Ergas similar, despite conceptual differences
Botox escapes 'genericity' trap
Trade marks protected against silent freedom of speech
Sweden Annual report for 2007
New online guide to trade mark cancellations
Switzerland: New Provisions on Counterfeit and Pirated Goods
ICANN approves rules for new TLDs
Sunrise over the Netherlands this September
ECJ and dilution: the Advocate General advises in Intel v CPM
Polar and Polaris held insufficiently similar to confuse discerning consumers
OHIM – measuring success.
Video tour of OHIM's new website
L'Altra and Alba -- marks of a different mode
ZIPCAR, CICAR and conceptual distinctions
German Federal Patent Court: Insolvency of the trade mark proprietor and trade mark renewal fees
Google abandons "Gmail" in Germany
German Federal Patent Court: "MEN/MISS"
WIPO: FerdinandPorsche.com
FIAT will not step back
Rectified reclaimed
Massive reputation of SPA in Benelux blocks MINERAL SPA CTM
Latest ETMR
WIPO: Yell Limited v. Yell.travel
Next week in the ECJ
Recent rational ruling
Polish PDO's problems
How NOT to advertise drugs in Poland
Wines are different, CFI tells Coke
No similarity, no detriment
European Union flag gets Art 6ter protection in Lithuania
Latest Alicante News now published
The Hungarian Patent Office's annual report for 2007 available for download
No return for appellant in Boomerang appeal
UKIPO: Save functionality on the on-line Form TM3
Marketing: is now the time to spend on packaging, not advertising?
WIPO: Iceland designations - new fees from 19 July 2008
Germany: Trade Mark dispute over name of a brothel
Kosovo -- more time to file those revalidations
Reclaim the windows
Sports sponsorship can be bad news for brand owners
SOFT BLUE appeal fails
Lego argues its case before the CFI
ECJ rules in 'bubbles' case
CFI can't rectify an implicit decision
Volailles de Loué PGI spec amended
Spain – when is the applicant acting in bad faith when filing an application for a trade mark?
Korean GIs come to Europe -- and you have two months in which to comment
Tuesday Trade Mark Treats: EURO 2008
A new OHIM web site on 1 July 2008
FANTASTIKA not likely to be confused with FANTA
ECJ forthcoming attractions
The saga of the SAGA
Savile Row Bespoke
UK: Revised Magistrates’ Court Sentencing Guidelines with specific guideline for trade mark offences
Working Group proposes replacement of "tacit acceptance" regime
Global branding for a family-owned cult wine: can it be done?
Casatella Trevigiana gains PDO status
Bundesgerichtshof: "THE HOME STORE"
Spanish government to invest in “Made in Spain”.
New geographical indications registered
     + May (68)
     + April (72)
     + March (77)
     + February (100)
     + January (100)
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors