Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  TUESDAY, 18 MARCH 2008
No Sweets in Court for Scott's The Sweet Trademark

With seventies hit singles like Poppa Joe, Blockbuster, Fox on the Run, Ballroom Blitz and Co Co, the British pop band The Sweet was quite a popular one and still is. The Sweet started as Sweetshop in 1968 with Brian Connoly as a singer and Mick Tucker on drums. In the sucess years guitarist Andy Scott and bass player Steve Priest completed the line-up. Today the Presiding Judge of the District Court in The Hague (mr Chr.A.J.F.M. Hensen) came to a decision in a trade mark infringement case (summary proceedings) started by Scott against the Dutch music wholesaler Galaxy Music B.V. Scott has registered The Sweet and Sweet as trade marks on his own name, first in the UK in 2002, followed by a CTM for The Sweet on September 22, 2005 (classes 9, 25 and 41). The history of The Sweet learns that Conolly left the band in 1979 to start a solo career, the other band members continued the band using the band's name till 1982, when the band stopped. In 1986 Turner and Scott reunited but Conolly followed his own direction and build his own version of The Sweet: Brian Conolly and the New Sweet. With a short exception in 1989 the band members kept going their own Sweet bands. Unfortunetaly Conolly died in 1997 (he re-recorded a few hits of The Sweet in 1995), Tucker in 2002. Scott keeps the memory alive and keeps on touring as The Sweet with new band members.

Galaxy (http://www.galaxy-music.com/) sells in Europe a box of cd's ('Remember the 70's') that is described on the website as 'A beautiful 3 cd collection with a good overview of the seventies hits, included amongst other songs from The Sweet (....).' The cd's include The Sweet' songs Little Willy, Fox On The Run and Blockbuster, which titles are used in the playlist, that is printed on the back of the cd cover, followed by 'The Sweet' between brackets). The songs however are those that Conolly re-recorded in 1995. The cover of the cd's shows a picture of the Sweet with Scott and Conolly in the front.

Scott argued that this use of The Sweet infringed his CTM, because Galaxy used the sign Sweet and The Sweet without his permission in the art work. Scott appealed to art. 9 par 1 a, b and c CTMR.

Galaxy respondend that she could use the recordings using the signs Sweet and The Sweet as well. The recordings were made by Brian Conolly in his 1995 line-up of The Sweet. Galaxy challegend that because of Scott's trade mark registration in 2005 the signs Sweet or The Sweet could not be used anymore for recordings of a band called The Sweet. Galaxy referred to art. 12 sub b CTMR that lays down that a trade mark owner can not oppose the use by a third party in the course of trade of indications concerning characteristics of the goods or services.

The Presiding Judge establishes first of all that Galaxy did not refer to copyright. Thus the Presiding Judge concludes that there seemed to be no obstacle for Galaxy to include the Conolly versions of The Sweet songs in the compilation. This compilation - so the Presiding Judge - continued his deliberations includes 48 songs, 3 of which are connected somehow to The Sweet. The signs Sweet or The Sweet are used 15 times in the artwork. Other signs, that refer to other bands, are used over 200 times. Furthermore a few hundred other signs in the art work refer to the song titles that are included in the compilation.

For the time being (summary proceedings) the Presiding Judge - who qualifies the use of Sweet and The Sweet as frequent - decides that this use is not to regarded as trade mark use according to art. 9 CTMR. The box of cd's is not offered to the public using the trade mark. Furthermore the use of the signs Sweet and The Sweet should be regarded as an indication for the three songs of The Sweet that are included in the compilation. Such use is covered by the exception of art. 12 CTMR. Another view would be contrary to art. 25 par. 1 of the Dutch Copyright Act according to which an author has a right to be named in any publication of his work.

The trade mark claims where dismissed on these grounds. Scott's other claims (infringement of his portrait right with regard to the picture of The Sweet used in the artwork and unlawful deceptive advertising because of the false impression that the included songs were not the original ones) were dismissed too.

Posted by: Gino Van Roeyen @ 10.00 
Tags: community trade marks, The Sweet, trade mark infringement,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3279 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
515 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
+ 2009
- 2008
     + December (66)
     + November (60)
     + October (72)
     + September (86)
     + August (48)
     + July (57)
     + June (64)
     + May (68)
     + April (72)
     - March (77)
Poland: are they fencing?
Two-horse race for Absolut
When can the Slovenian IP Office appeal?
Aire Limpio: what the Advocate General recommended
UKIPO: your views on the modernisation of the Trade Mark rules
Nominet: Dispute Resolution Service Statistics
Wrangler vs Dogg Label
MONTBLANC is famous -- even in Lithuania
JAGUAR and LAND ROVER brands head east
Denmark: "Government report on counterfeiting and piracy"
Spain - the Spanish Trade Marks and Patents Office sets "quality compromises".
Alliance Apotek turns to Boots in Norway
PGI application for 'Kainuun rönttönen'
Pepsi swallows Sobol
French luxury brands, quality and history: the 'true' approach?
BOEUF DE BAZAS to become a PGI
Banksy: Trade Marks and Anonimity
Latest European Trade Mark Reports
France: more counterfeit goods seized in 2007
Results of the OHIM User Satisfaction Survey 2007
L'Oréal/Smart Club dispute leads to EFTA request
Germany: current issue of PMZ with Federal Patent Court statistics
WIPO: bmwaudiobooks.com
Hamming it Up: Prosciuttos Sold on the Italian Market Found to be ‘Fakes’
Alicante News now available
Poland: Higher fees for trade marks
Poland: no confusion between MAKROTERM and MAKRO
Switzerland: Lower fees for trade marks
Counterfeit medicines in the EU: a new consultation
Lights on for Martini Fratelli, while Spirits Giant Loses Out
Compatible bricks for Lego systems "not unfair competition"
Google loses Gmail appeal in Alicante
No Sweets in Court for Scott's The Sweet Trademark
Spain - Busy Week for Customs.
iPOD well-known in Turkey
WIPO: domain "prada-girls.com" registered in bad faith
New Serbian .rs domain is a success
Getting it right with product recalls
United Kingdom: New ITMA website launched
New Ukraine trade mark fees in the offing
Germany: Federal Patent Court "GALLUP II"
Forthcoming attractions in the ECJ
Germany: Federal Patent Court on the colour "red"
AIPPI Dutch Group Conference Today
Spongebob, Dora and Go Diego Go bag Vadobag
Germany: OLG Frankfurt decides "Adword" case
First "Flocke" mark now owned by the city of Nuremberg
OHIM - OHIM's President interviewed by the Spanish economic journal "Cinco Días"
OHIM: more information on national search reports after 10 March 2008
WIPO: straight about vodka
France: u-turn on perfume comparison chart?
Don't Stretch Your Ferrari!
International Ski Schools in France: A Litigious Bunch?
Austria: Fu Long trade mark dispute and even more polar cubs
ICEBERG trumps Turkish ICE BOYS ... so far
Bulgaria sees post-accession boom in trade mark litigation
Polish croissant to become a PGI
Germany: Nuremberg zoo wins FLOCKE trade mark dispute
CTM fees and national offices
WIPO: Panathinaikos.com goes to football club
PGI application for GOUDA HOLLAND
OHIM reports record filing figures for 2007
Poland: no jokes with village name
MR SPICY keyword action struck out
Spain - How widespread should be a non-registered trade name to qualify as "well known" in Spain?
Protection of geographical indications as part of the WTO Doha Round negotiations?
Franchising in Ukraine: it can be done!
DPMA: 41 Flocke trade mark applications and counting...
UK IPO: Public Consultation on the Modernisation and Consolidation of the Trade Marks Rules
DPMA: more indications of geographical origin
EDAM HOLLAND application for PGI protection
Serbian domain names; powers of attorney in Croatia
When cheese turns to meat
Apology
Germany: new look for the DPMA's website
Scotland: PDO status for the Scottish Kilt?
March ETMR now out
     + February (100)
     + January (100)
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors