Login | Join Us | Contact Us | Search
 
 
 

 
 
  About Us   Press         Conferences   Members   Teams       Publications   Class 46     Position Papers   FAQs        Links     

Class 46 - for your European trade mark news
 

Now in its sixth year, Class 46  is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice.  This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
 
  SUNDAY, 17 FEBRUARY 2008
WIPO: domain name 4711.org registered in bad faith

The WIPO arbitration panel has ruled that the domain name "4711.org" had been registered and used in bad faith and ordered that the domain be transferred to its legitimate owner Mäurer + Wirtz GmbH & Co. KG, Germany, the proprietor of numerous trade mark registrations for the mark "4711".

The complainant, Mäurer + Wirtz GmbH & Co. KG, is is a German company registered with the commercial register of Aachen, Germany, which has been active in the market of perfumes and perfumeries for more than 150 years and is well known in Germany. In January 2007 the complainant acquired the “4711” business from Mülhens GmbH & Co KG and as a part of this deal the seller transferred the full title and interest over numerous trade marks to the complainant. This included more than thousand trade mark registrations for the mark “4711” globally. The domain "4711.org" was first registered on December 27, 2003, and subsequently acquired by Respondent, Lajos Kiss, Delux Befektetes, Hungary, on July 15, 2007.

Assen Alexiev, acting as sole panelist ruled that the domain "4711.org" had been registered and used in bad faith:

"In the present proceeding, Respondent did not itself register the Domain Name, rather, it is only a transferee. That is the reason why the doctrine of “extension” can be invoked here, that is, that the term “registration” extends beyond the original act of registration and covers subsequent acquisitions of the Domain Name. Thus, Policy, paragraph 4(b)(i) specifically refers to circumstances in which Respondent has registered or has acquired a domain name, and there are prior Panel decisions in which it has been held more generally that “registration” extends to subsequent acts of acquisition. BWR Resources Ltd v. Waitomo Adventures Ltd., WIPO Case No. D2000-0861, Motorola, Inc. v. NewGate Internet, Inc. WIPO Case No. D2000-0079, and Dixons Group Plc v. Mr. Abu Abdullaah, WIPO Case No. D2000-1406. Therefore, the acquisition by a party of a domain name amounts to a new registration, and is evaluated for the purposes of the Policy by application of the same criteria. Complainant’s trade mark “4711” and the Eau de Cologne produced under this trademark is widely popular among consumers. Respondent acquired the Domain Name, having no rights or legitimate interests in it, and only days after its previous registrant received the cease and desist letter by Complainant. These facts support a finding, uncontroverted by any evidence in the case file, that Respondent had knowledge of Complainant’s trade mark and associated goodwill, as well as of Complainant’s claims in relation to the Domain Name at the time of its acquisition... In the light of this finding, and taking into account the commercial nature of the website linked to the Domain Name and the lack of any relation of this content to Complainant ... the Panel finds that Respondent acquired the Domain Name in knowledge of Complainant and with the intent to secure it from the claims of Complainant. Taking into account the content of the website linked to the Domain Name and the usual practices in the Internet such links to be provided against payment, the Panel finds that Respondent’s other purpose in acquiring and using the Domain Name was to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to this website, by creating a likelihood of confusion with Complainant’s mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the website and the products on this website. This constitutes bad-faith registration and use of the disputed Domain Name under Policy, paragraph 4(b)(iv). Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba d/b/a Toshiba Corporation v. Liu Xingdong, WIPO Case No. D2003-0408."

Case reference: Mäurer + Wirtz GmbH & Co. KG v. Lajos Kiss, Delux Befektetes
Case No. D2007-1696 of 8 February 2008

Posted by: Birgit Clark @ 22.11 
Tags: Domain names, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center,

 

   0 comments:    Post a comment

 
 

Search Class 46
Search:

Who we all are...

Birgit Clark
Edith Van den Eede
Fidel Porcuna
Frédéric Glaize
Gino Van Roeyen
Jeremy Phillips
Kathrin Vowinckel
Laetitia Lagarde
Mark Schweizer
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Pedro Malaquias
Robert Börner
Tomasz Rychlicki

Receive Class 46 by email
3308 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog by email circular. Why don't you?

To subscribe, just type your email address in the box below, then click the 'Subscribe' button.
email:

Receive Class 46 by RSS Feed
519 readers now receive the Class 46 weblog via an RSS reader.

Subscribe in a reader


The Class 46 archive


+ 2013
+ 2012
+ 2011
+ 2010
+ 2009
- 2008
     + December (66)
     + November (60)
     + October (72)
     + September (86)
     + August (48)
     + July (57)
     + June (64)
     + May (68)
     + April (72)
     + March (77)
     - February (100)
WIPO Magazine February 2008 - No. 1
Germany: "How much is that trade mark in my portfolio?"
More protected designations published
WORLDLINK, figurative LINK sufficiently similar to cause confusion
Maple motifs and national emblems: the CFI rules
Trade Marks and Cognitive Science
Madrid filings in 2007: Richter Gedeon hits the high spot
WIPO: new fees for Finland designations from 1 April 2008
Italy: Counterfeit Ferrari
WIPO: Iceland designations - new fees from 1 March 2008
OHIM recognizes two new "World Expositions".
A reminder about the Isle of Man
INTERPOL announces an international IP crime database
ECJ delivers Parmesan ruling
New OHIM practice manual on its way
WIPO: domain "villeroy-boch.mobi" registered in bad faith
DPMA reports on effect of new case law regarding retail services
Germany: Decision in first Flocke case expected on 7 March
Trade mark protection for French dishes à la façon Sarkozy?
Poland: famous brands and students
A little bit about Class 46
A Hanze University Student's Investigation in Trade Mark Protection
No Lolly for Chupa Tolly against Chupa Chups
Friday trade mark treat: Cancellation request for "Vollmond-Salami"
Luba against Lunajob: likelihood of confusion?
After the ECJ decisions, grey goods battle returns to the real world
Unauthorised youtube.gr domain cancelled in Greece
CHASSELAS DE MOISSAC wins out over friendly "rivals"
Alicante News available
BBC Radio 4 programme on trade marks
CFI order in Case T-410/07 R Jurado Hermanos v OHIM
Animals in Trade Mark Design?
New Russian law focuses on domain names, licences
UKIPO: New on-line TM3 form launches on 7 April 2008
Germany: Next chapter of the "Flocke" saga
History of car logotypes
CFI upholds ORSAY opposition
Portakabinalia
Spain: the best trade marks according to Interbrand
SIPO: Updated edition of Intellectual Property Acts of the Republic of Slovenia
WIPO: Audi experiences cybersquatting problems
ICANN: New TLD's policy
BGH refers "Bayerisches Bier" to the ECJ
DPMA: protected geographical indications (g.g.A.)
WIPO: domain name 4711.org registered in bad faith
Buzztime tells Buzz! to buzz off
Latest European Trade Mark Reports
Benelux Court of Justice Rules on Bad Faith Trade Mark Infringement and a Claim for an Account of Profits
Radicchio di Chioggia to be a PGI?
French steel industrialists vulnerable to confusion
Lovemarks
Der Grüne Punkt - Trade mark for Performance and Quality
DENIC: Latest top level domain statistics
Recent postings on the Curia website
Coexistence of GIs
Poland: "prior tempore potior iure" in "primus inter pares"?
France: bookmakers and the Juventus trade mark
Parmesan Prognosis soon to be Delivered by the European Court of Justice
New alcohol labelling regulation published
Updated OHIM statistics
Lennon not for Murphy
Spain – The Spanish Patents and Trademarks Office will use email to notify parties not having a domicile in Spain.
Commission Regulation No 112/2008
UK Trade mark protection for "Mr Loophole"
Latest World Trademark Review
Does German crooner Patrick Lindner own "Flocke"?
OHIM: CTM warning letters - apology
UK IPO: Trade Mark Forms updated
Some Sunday (trade mark) treats...
Country code top level domains v. generic top level domains
Germany: "Moderate marketing" of polar bear Flocke
Germany: Plagiarius Awards 2008
ICANN supports Google's fight against domain-tasting
Overhaul to the internet's address system
France: trade mark applications filings up 4.6% in 2007
Poland: "gmail.pl" to remain with poets
Swedish Trade Mark Registry: Exchange visits from Slovenia and Croatia
UK High Court, Eli Lilly and the Canadian online pharmacies
Austria: "trade mark fight" over baby Panda Fu Long
WIPO: domain "danonecancer.com" registered in bad faith
Could Berliner Currywurst be a trade mark?
Applicable law is that in force on date of registration, rules German court
German trade marks and polar bears: "I love Flocke"?
OHIM: New decision of the Presidium of the Boards of Appeal
Poland: Minimum rates
WIPO: t-mobiletv.mobi goes to T-Mobile
PURE DIGITAL appeal for ECJ
Does anyone know?
Cloverfield and product placement
France: top trade mark applicants in 2006
WIPO: statistics on trade mark applications by Office since 1883
Update - OHIM Service Charter
Austria: 20 years of top level ".at" domain
Does 'Geert Wilders ... Extremist....Harms You and Society Seriously' infringe the Marlboro trade mark?
Woolworths withdraws "Lolita" girls' furniture
Poland: Watch out for counterfeits
Austrians prefer brands
Bulgaria signs up for Singapore
Round 2 in a Dutch Red Bullfight
Commission publishes list of customs contacts for IP infringement
     + January (100)
+ 2007

 
 

Terms of Use: The material included on this site is provided for information purposes only, and we make no representations or warranties as to its accuracy. It does not represent legal advice. Before relying on this material, you should take care to verify its accuracy, taking professional advice as appropriate. [Please click here for the full Terms and Conditions of Use]

Copyright ©2008-2013 MARQUES Ltd and Individual Contributors